Hello Adam,
First, some great news: Salomé was accepted into unstable! Now we can
file multiple independent bugs and track all of these issues separately.
Excellent! I am really glad to hear it.
I feel really sorry for the wrong patch that I sent you, the reason
is that I forgot to add
Hi Adam,
I've installed your patches, but still have the same build error:
./.libs/libVisuConvertor.so: undefined reference to `vtkIntArray*
VISU::GetIDMapperVISU::TGetPointData(VISU::TFieldList*,
VISU::TGetPointData, char const*)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
It seems like if
Hello Andre,
First, some great news: Salomé was accepted into unstable! Now we can
file multiple independent bugs and track all of these issues separately.
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:53 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
Hi Adam,
I've installed your patches, but still have the same build error:
Hello Andre,
I've installed your patches, but still have the same build error:
./.libs/libVisuConvertor.so: undefined reference to `vtkIntArray*
VISU::GetIDMapperVISU::TGetPointData(VISU::TFieldList*, VISU::TGetPointData,
char const*)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
It seems like if the
Hello Adam,
I have just succeeded to make a 5.1.3-9 release with VISU, I have
enclosed the 2 patches. I also wanted to let you know that I have
understood the runtime problems of VISU but I need to progress
by steps (my solution is still too messy for being published). I will
first be glad if the
Hello André,
Thanks for your work on this, I'm glad it's working. I'm afraid I won't
have much time to look into your tree, let alone merge the differences,
for a few days, but will get back to you soon.
-Adam
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:06 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the lack of news, I was focus on making VISU work. I have
succeeded to build a Salome package however the current result is
unfortunately split from our development line. That's why I will first
explain my steps and then ask your advice on the merge as I saw that
serious
Greetings,
I am not a Salome user, but here are some (hopefully not too stupid)
remarks about
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/salome_5.1.3-8.html
* Binary packages are under the contrib/ section, AFAICT they can be
moved into main
* libsalome and libsalome-dev ships a lot of shared
Hello Denis,
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:28 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
Greetings,
I am not a Salome user, but here are some (hopefully not too stupid)
remarks about
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/salome_5.1.3-8.html
* Binary packages are under the contrib/ section, AFAICT they can
Hi again,
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 14:44 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:40 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
Second, I've cut the number of lintian warnings by dozens by making
the .py files non-executable. The one problem that results is during
startup, which can be
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the delay, I have missed the -6 release but I have
just built the -7 one which works fine. I have updated the
documentation on:
http://wiki.debian.org/BuildingSalome
It seems that building Med dependencies by hand is no longer needed
because libmed-2.3.6-2 is now available in
Hi André,
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:40 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the delay, I have missed the -6 release but I have
just built the -7 one which works fine.
No problem. -6 had a dumb mistake which caused it to be rejected by
Debian right away, so you didn't miss anything.
Hello all,
I think we're getting close to a -6 release and first upload into Debian
unstable. I'm noticing two issues though which will need just a tiny
bit of work.
First, the -dev dependency extends beyond libsalome-dev. For example,
the GEOM module requires libTKOpenGl.so which is in
Hi Adam,
I guess that it is not relevant to run the 5.1.3-4 build again
if this version works for you. I am now starting a complete build
with all modules.
I've built -5 with everything but VISU and NETGENPLUGIN (which don't
build), they're at
Thank you Andre, the debian-science entry looks terrific!
It's very frustrating that bug 510057 against hdf5 is nearly 16 months
old, and there has been a simple patch available for 3.5 months, but
they have just added a new upstream version, with no progress on this or
571453. :-( I'm going to
Hi Sylvestre,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:18:45PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le mardi 20 avril 2010 à 15:25 +0200, Andre Espaze a écrit :
By the way, have you had any luck with asking upstream to adopt some
of
these patches? Let me know if you need more information about any
of
Hi Adam,
I guess that it is not relevant to run the 5.1.3-4 build again
if this version works for you. I am now starting a complete build
with all modules.
I've built -5 with everything but VISU and NETGENPLUGIN (which don't
build), they're at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/salome/ .
Le mardi 20 avril 2010 à 15:25 +0200, Andre Espaze a écrit :
By the way, have you had any luck with asking upstream to adopt some
of
these patches? Let me know if you need more information about any
of
them.
I discussed that point with Nicolas yesterday. I am supposed to submit
the
Hi Adam,
Apologies for the long delay in replying since your message arrived.
I've been very busy, and just yesterday finally compiled Salomé.
No problem, I have been busy too last week and I am now coming back
on Salomé.
I made the KERNEL and GUI modules work this morning on the 5.1.3-5
Hi André,
Apologies for the long delay in replying since your message arrived.
I've been very busy, and just yesterday finally compiled Salomé.
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 12:06 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
Hi Adam,
Concerning the 5.1.3-5, I can not start Salomé from debian/tmp/usr. The
Hi Adam,
Concerning the 5.1.3-5, I can not start Salomé from debian/tmp/usr. The
funny point is that I can run Salomé when compiling it by hand in a
dedicated directory. An identified problem was the line:
chmod -x $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.5/*-packages/salome/*
Hi Adam,
Hi everyone and apologies for the long delay since I last wrote.
No problem, I was also busy on others projects but I am back
on Salomé for this week and I should work full time on it
for the week starting on the 19th of april.
I've been getting VirtualBox to work, as suggested by
Hi André,
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 14:07 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
Hi Adam,
Hi everyone and apologies for the long delay since I last wrote.
No problem, I was also busy on others projects but I am back
on Salomé for this week and I should work full time on it
for the week starting on the
Hi everyone and apologies for the long delay since I last wrote.
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 06:49 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 17:23 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
The last working version was actually the -4:
c56f196854092f0dc0d222de71de1a4532f214ec
Hi André,
Sorry about the delay, I've been trying to get X working in a chroot but
a known bug is making the keyboard and mouse not work... Copying my sid
chroot into its own partition now to try to boot and test there.
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 17:23 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
The last working
Hi Adam,
The last working version was actually the -4:
c56f196854092f0dc0d222de71de1a4532f214ec
Release 5.1.3-4 Look ma, it builds!
That's what I thought. I tried that one today (backported to Ubuntu
Karmic), and it didn't work. I guess I'll have to bring X up in the
Hi Adam
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 12:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:36 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
However, I got a runtime error with my version, the study server is
not found even if I only work with the KERNEL and GUI modules. I am
going to run a new build
Hi André,
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:23 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 12:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:36 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
However, I got a runtime error with my version, the study server is
not found even if I only work with
Hi again,
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 12:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:36 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
However, I got a runtime error with my version, the study server is
not found even if I only work with the KERNEL and GUI modules. I am
going to run a new build at
Hi Adam,
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to
use the
bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
bug in Debian is that salome isn't there -- #457075. :-)
Hello Andre,
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:36 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to
use the
bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the
Hi Andre,
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 13:11 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 17:19 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use
the
bug
Hi Adam,
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use the
bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
bug in Debian is that salome isn't there -- #457075. :-)
Ok, so from now I
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 17:19 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use the
bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
bug in Debian is
Hi Adam,
Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use the
bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
bug in Debian is that salome isn't there -- #457075. :-)
Ok, so from now I organise tickets on
Hi Andre,
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use the
bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
bug in Debian is that salome isn't there -- #457075. :-)
Ok, so from now I organise
Hi Adam,
Thank you very much for your fast reply. I am sorry for not being as
responsive, I am new to Debian packaging and I am also discovering git.
I have succeeded to build most of the Salomé modules with the
version 5.1.3-3 that you uploaded at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/salome/
I think this is getting into the technical details, so it is probably
not so interesting to the debian-science list. I'm afraid I can't
figure out a way to set up an account on ww.python-science.org; if you
can let me know how then I'll go ahead and use that.
A message with your first and
Hello Andre,
No problem regarding the reply time. It takes a while to come up to
speed on git, quilt, and the complicated Debian packaging system.
I've made a lot of progress in getting salome to build and clean itself
properly, so some things should be much easier. The only thing not
building
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 11:59 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
I think this is getting into the technical details, so it is probably
not so interesting to the debian-science list. I'm afraid I can't
figure out a way to set up an account on ww.python-science.org; if you
can let me know how then
Hi Adam,
I am André Espaze, the Logilab's employee supposed to help you in the
Salomé packaging for Debian. First I wanted to thank you for the great
work that you did on the current package. Then I would like to let you
know my progress on the testing part.
I have succeeded to build most of
On 2010/2/11 Andre Espaze:
[...]
- it seems to lack the 'config.h' file in the libopencascade-*
packages. Else do you know where that file could be? I fear that
some components (like GEOM) really need it.
[...]
Hi André,
This file has been dropped intentionnally, it does not make
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:32:35PM +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
How to you plan to collaborate on the package building? I would suggest
to use the project http://www.python-science.org/project/salome-packaging
because I can be efficiently organized on such a platform. Would you
like to add
Le jeudi 11 février 2010 à 18:54 +0100, Nicolas Chauvat a écrit :
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:32:35PM +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
How to you plan to collaborate on the package building? I would suggest
to use the project http://www.python-science.org/project/salome-packaging
because I
Hello Andre,
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 17:32 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
Hi Adam,
I am André Espaze, the Logilab's employee supposed to help you in the
Salomé packaging for Debian. First I wanted to thank you for the great
work that you did on the current package. Then I would like to let you
Hello again,
I think this is getting into the technical details, so it is probably
not so interesting to the debian-science list. I'm afraid I can't
figure out a way to set up an account on ww.python-science.org; if you
can let me know how then I'll go ahead and use that.
In the meantime, I'd
Sorry, forgot to mention a couple of things yesterday. First, the
package doesn't build in current unstable, because HDF5 transitioned and
MED didn't transition with it. I may be able to help with MED to
resolve this, but not until next week. (It builds fine in my unstable
chroot updated a few
Hello again,
I now have 10 modules enabled, and have made all but one of the patches
upstream-friendly, though I've only uploaded the -3 source package to
http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/salome/ at the moment.
Nicolas, can you do me a favor and try to push some of the patches
upstream? You can find
Greetings,
For those interested, I'm re-doing the Salomé .deb I started three years
ago. Salomé is a finite element pre-post processing framework, with a
lot of other things in there as well.
Though some things have improved between version 3.2.6 and 5.1.3, many
have not, so although this
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:28 +0100, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 02:29:03PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
For those interested, I'm re-doing the Salomé .deb I started three years
...
Because I can't do the whole package, I'm putting up the progress I've
...
To
50 matches
Mail list logo
