Bug#664642: ITP: node-rimraf -- Deep deletion (like rm -rf) module for Node.js
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org * Package name: node-rimraf Version : 2.0.1 Upstream Author : Isaac Z. Schlueter i...@izs.me * URL : https://github.com/isaacs/rimraf * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript Description : Deep deletion (like rm -rf) module for Node.js node-rimraf is a Node.js module that provides asynchronous deep-deletion, similar to the `rm -rf` shell command. . Node.js is an event-based server-side javascript engine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120319150756.12582.90565.reportbug@imac.chaumes
Bug#664642: ITP: node-rimraf -- Deep deletion (like rm -rf) module for Node.js
also sprach Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org [2012.03.19.1607 +0100]: node-rimraf is a Node.js module that provides asynchronous deep-deletion, similar to the `rm -rf` shell command. . Node.js is an event-based server-side javascript engine. Why does this sound like an extremely bad idea? Javascript + rm -rf? That's like russian roulette with 5 bullets, not just one. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#664642: ITP: node-rimraf -- Deep deletion (like rm -rf) module for Node.js
On 19/03/2012 17:37, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org [2012.03.19.1607 +0100]: node-rimraf is a Node.js module that provides asynchronous deep-deletion, similar to the `rm -rf` shell command. . Node.js is an event-based server-side javascript engine. Why does this sound like an extremely bad idea? Javascript + rm -rf? That's like russian roulette with 5 bullets, not just one. Not more a bad idea that python's shutil.rmtree. I don't see why JavaScript would be less a language than any other languages here. Nobody forces you to use it, if you don't trust it. Also it's probably better to actually have one working and tested function than none at all. Jérémy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f676448.2030...@melix.org