Bug#737016: Bug#834131: Video support still not working
On Friday, January 13, 2017 10:04:44 AM CST you wrote: > Sorry for the delay! That's no problem. With Debian in freeze, I'm not in any hurry. > If you are still interested please join the Qt/KDE team > on alioth. Done. > Is qtav as repo name OK for you? Sure. -S signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#737016: Bug#834131: Video support still not working
On lunes, 2 de enero de 2017 14:28:02 ART Steve Robbins wrote: [snip] > I've never heard of Qt-extras. If that's a better fit: fine with me. Where > is the repo? Sorry for the delay! If you are still interested please join the Qt/KDE team on alioth. Is qtav as repo name OK for you? Thanks, Lisandro. -- 20:16 < Gerardo_Cabero> che me tengo que ir volando .. sino me matan.. esto de tener novia es tan complicacdo como instalar paketes sin internet Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#737016: Bug#834131: Video support still not working
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 07:01:49PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > I've never heard of Qt-extras. If that's a better fit: fine with me. Where > > is the repo? > > We never created it, but we can easily do it. > > Dmitry/anyone else: any thoughts before I go ahead? No objections from me! -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#737016: Bug#834131: Video support still not working
On lunes, 2 de enero de 2017 14:28:02 ART Steve Robbins wrote: > On Monday, January 2, 2017 4:17:14 PM CST you wrote: > > On miércoles, 28 de diciembre de 2016 14:14:51 ART Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > Having heard nothing, I will go ahead with packaging QtAV. > > > > > > I'd really rather do this as a team-maintained package. Is this > > > something > > > that would be suitable for KDE Extras? > > > > Sure thing. Dmitry and I have also been thinking in Qt-extras, but > > kde-extras is just fine. > > I've never heard of Qt-extras. If that's a better fit: fine with me. Where > is the repo? We never created it, but we can easily do it. Dmitry/anyone else: any thoughts before I go ahead? -- ¿De qué vive un superamigo? De las regalías de su merchandising, que sólo puede ser adquirido por burgueses. Como a los burgueses no les agradan las clases bajas, los superamigos sólo salvan burgueses. José Hipólito Moyano - http://bit.ly/fYgbLJ Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#737016: Bug#834131: Video support still not working
On Monday, January 2, 2017 4:17:14 PM CST you wrote: > On miércoles, 28 de diciembre de 2016 14:14:51 ART Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > Having heard nothing, I will go ahead with packaging QtAV. > > > > I'd really rather do this as a team-maintained package. Is this something > > that would be suitable for KDE Extras? > > Sure thing. Dmitry and I have also been thinking in Qt-extras, but > kde-extras is just fine. I've never heard of Qt-extras. If that's a better fit: fine with me. Where is the repo? > Feel free to ask here for reviews if you want. Thanks! -Steve signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#737016: Bug#834131: Video support still not working
On miércoles, 28 de diciembre de 2016 14:14:51 ART Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 1:30:39 PM CST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > Meyer wrote: > > Well, the FRP was not done by a team member nor, as far as I know, anyone > > one the team is thinking in packaging it. > > > > I'm CCing the RFP bug to see if he's still interested in packaging it. El > > se I would suggest you to consider packaging it yourself. > > Having heard nothing, I will go ahead with packaging QtAV. > > I'd really rather do this as a team-maintained package. Is this something > that would be suitable for KDE Extras? Sure thing. Dmitry and I have also been thinking in Qt-extras, but kde-extras is just fine. Feel free to ask here for reviews if you want. Cheers! -- "Hola, soy su amigo Chespirito. Cuando estaba yo en el vientre de mi madre, ella sufrió un accidente que la puso al borde de la muerte. El médico le dijo: -Tendrás que abortar. Y ella respondió: -¿Abortar yo? Jamás. Es decir, defendió la vida, mi vida. Y gracias a ello estoy aquí." Roberto "Chespirito" Gómez Bolaños http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chespirito Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#737016: Bug#834131: Video support still not working
On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 1:30:39 PM CST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Well, the FRP was not done by a team member nor, as far as I know, anyone > one the team is thinking in packaging it. > > I'm CCing the RFP bug to see if he's still interested in packaging it. El se > I would suggest you to consider packaging it yourself. Having heard nothing, I will go ahead with packaging QtAV. I'd really rather do this as a team-maintained package. Is this something that would be suitable for KDE Extras? Thanks, -Steve signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#737016: Bug#834131: Video support still not working
On domingo, 18 de diciembre de 2016 13:53:34 ART Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Sunday, December 18, 2016 2:49:42 PM CST Simon Frei wrote: > > [...] upstream has dropped QTmultimedia for video handling and uses > > QtAV (which in turn is based of ffmpeg). Unfortunately QtAV is not yet > > in debian (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737016), > > however upstream provides debian packaging already, which worked almost > > fine for me (buildep without -nc flag resulted in an error). This will > > take effect in the upcoming 5.4.0 release due at the end of this month. > > Thanks for the heads-up on the change to QtAV. > > Question for the KDE maintainers: the RFP for QtAV is fairly old, which > makes me wonder if there is any issue (technical or legal) that stands in > the way of packaging it. ?? Hi! Well, the FRP was not done by a team member nor, as far as I know, anyone one the team is thinking in packaging it. I'm CCing the RFP bug to see if he's still interested in packaging it. El se I would suggest you to consider packaging it yourself. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- 5: Para que sirve el comando "deshacer" * Para olvidarse de una noche de alcohol Damian Nadales http://mx.grulic.org.ar/lurker/message/20080307.141449.a70fb2fc.es.html Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
