Bug#752876: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-06-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Roger, thanks for the information. I've uploaded the changes to the Debian new queue. Kind regards Andreas. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:43:24PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > spdep_0.6-5 submitted to CRAN. > > Roger > > > On Tue, 31 May 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > >

Bug#752876: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-06-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, upstream has removed the file in question in SVN. I excluded it in the repackaged source tarball and applied the patches needed to the remaining files and re-uploaded. Fast-processing would be extremely helpful. Kind regards from Stockholm Andreas. On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:00:23PM

Bug#752876: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-05-31 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Roger, thanks for your work on this issue. I confirm that you have removed the file in question from SVN and removed the usage of the compute_soi function from init.c and the function prototype from spdep.h. From my perspective this should deal with the complaints Debian ftpmaster had. I've

Bug#752876: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-05-31 Thread Roger Bivand
I've now spent three hours complying, IMHO far more than was sensible. The questioned code is gone, despite my not agreeing with your complaints, nor seeing that you were willing to contribute a replacement. Check out spdep from R-Forge, and reply rapidly confirming that no further changes are

Bug#752876: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-05-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Roger, On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:51:57PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote: > Please tell them that I am not willing to make any further changes. If they > bothered to look, they would have seen that the functions are not simply > copied from arm.c, but modified to use double rather than integer >

Bug#752876: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-05-30 Thread Roger Bivand
Hi Andreas, Please tell them that I am not willing to make any further changes. If they bothered to look, they would have seen that the functions are not simply copied from arm.c, but modified to use double rather than integer coordinates. I can add arm.c for documentation and change the

Bug#752876: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-05-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again Roger, this is just a ping in case you might have missed my last mail about the licensing of the file copied from "Computational Geometry in C". Were you able to clarify the issue or to rewrite the code in question? Thanks for your cooperation Andreas. On Fri, May 13, 2016 at

Bug#752876: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-05-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Roger, I'm afraid I need to come back to you again about the licensing of the file in question in the spdep package. Please read below what the Debian ftpmasters think about the license: On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:00:23PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > ok, one step