Clément Hermann wrote:
Actually, yes, it's a bit outdated. I'm currently working on the
dependancies needed for 3.0.1, see this edited output of dh-make-golang
estimate (some entries were false positive, due to different import path
that'll need to be patched, or an apparently useless for in the
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:51:35 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Hermann?=
wrote:
> On 10/07/2018 12:40, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > Hey folks,
>
> > I was pleased to see the last LXD dependency that we were tracking has
> > finally made it into Debian, so the path is likely clear for LXD itself
> > now
Hi !
On 10/07/2018 12:40, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Hey folks,
> I was pleased to see the last LXD dependency that we were tracking has
> finally made it into Debian, so the path is likely clear for LXD itself
> now (unless we need to catch up on some newer dependencies since the
> analysis was
Hey folks,
I was pleased to see the last LXD dependency that we were tracking has
finally made it into Debian, so the path is likely clear for LXD itself
now (unless we need to catch up on some newer dependencies since the
analysis was done: https://wiki.debian.org/LXD)
What's the status of the
On 03/02/2018 16:52, Clément Hermann wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there anything regarding lxc-team packaging style/workflow I should
> be aware of? From what I saw, the workflow seems to be using gbp with
> pristine star branch, UNRELEASED target distribution until the package
> is ready to upload, so very
Hi,
I've resumed active work on LXD, the last dependency
(golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2 - #883488) is almost done (pending review
and upload).
Regarding lxc-go, I suggest we archive the previous attemps, since it
will live in pkg-go repository (using gitlab Archive feature on Salsa).
Same for the
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 05:59:42PM +0100, Clément Hermann wrote:
> On 17/12/2017 21:39, Clément Hermann wrote:
>
> > On 04/12/2017 21:40, Clément Hermann wrote:
> >> So, I did some work on golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2
> >>
7 matches
Mail list logo
