Thanks, I will proceed as you suggested. Because limereg is versatile and not
limited to medical applications I'd prefer d-science, if I may choose.
Regards,
Roelof
Am 10.02.2015 um 22:30 schrieb Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:24:04PM +, Ghislain Vaillant
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:56:58AM +0100, Roelof Berg wrote:
Thanks, I will proceed as you suggested. Because limereg is versatile and not
limited to medical applications I'd prefer d-science, if I may choose.
Fine. Just commit to Debian Science Git (or SVN at your preference)
and ping me via
Ok, thanks a lot ! I think, that's all assistance I needed for now, and I have
enough information available for preparing the delivery.
Debian rocks :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Great, I really appreciate this. Thank you.
I plan to contribute three packages. I hope, the naming scheme is correct:
limereg: Commandline application for image registration (available)
liblimereg: Shared object library for image registration (in development)
liblimereg-dev: Headers etc. for
Added cc to debian-med.
I personally disagree with your statement on medical image registration. I
believe both fast and sophisticated registration tools can live together.
Your package would fit perfectly in d-science or d-med, if not both.
Regarding your naming scheme, I have nothing against
Thank you for giving so much details. Well, I'd be happy off course if
the package will be part of d-science and/or d-med.
I will apply your suggested naming scheme, maybe with one exception: I'd
prefer that the package named 'limereg' stands for the command line
tool, this makes it easy for
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:24:04PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
Added cc to debian-med.
I personally disagree with your statement on medical image registration. I
believe both fast and sophisticated registration tools can live together.
Your package would fit perfectly in d-science or
Hi Roelof,
this sounds pretty interesting. Since I see some scientific application
I added limereg-dev (assuming that the development library will be named
that way) to Debian Science imaging and Debian Med imaging-dev tasks.
I wonder whether it might make sense to maintain the package inside
Thanks for the links and the welcoming words. This is the motivation I need :)
I'm currently busy with making my .deb package compatible to launchpad ppa as a
quality measure.
Am I allowed to use full optimization (-Ofast) ? Or is it mandatory to use -O2 ?
I hope, this will find a sponsor. I
On Thursday, February 5, 2015, Roelof Berg rb...@berg-solutions.de wrote:
Thanks for the links and the welcoming words. This is the motivation I
need :) I'm currently busy with making my .deb package compatible to
launchpad ppa as a quality measure.
Great! (-:
Am I allowed to use full
Hi Roelof! I'm excited you want to work on this.
On Tuesday, February 3, 2015, Roelof Berg rb...@berg-solutions.de wrote:
I developed this application as part of a scientific project. It offers 2D,
grayscale, rigid image registration with a powerful
derivative based approach and operates
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roelof Berg rb...@berg-solutions.de
* Package name: limereg
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Roelof Berg rb...@berg-solutions.de
* URL : https://github.com/RoelofBerg/limereg
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Roelof Berg wrote:
However, I'm new to Open Source and to the packaging. Do I need a sponsor to
get the package accepted ? Also a review from an experienced packager would be
required as this is my first step into Open Source contribution.
Please read this
13 matches
Mail list logo
