Processed: Fwd: add blocking bug

2019-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 842943 by 923537 Bug #842943 [wnpp] RFP: signal-desktop -- standalone JS desktop client for Signal Messenger 842943 was blocked by: 923512 842420 842943 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 842943: 923537 > End of message,

Bug#786808: RFA: adequate -- Debian package quality testing tool

2019-03-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 16:54 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > So I'd really prefer if a team would take it over. And I still think > that the Lintian team would be the most appropriate team for that. FTR, I don't know when or if I'll find the time and motivation to work on adequate so I'll be happy

Bug#786808: RFA: adequate -- Debian package quality testing tool

2019-03-01 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 01/03/2019, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > Jakub Wilk wrote: >> >>I request an adopter for the adequate package. (Note that RFA != >> >>O. Talk to me before taking over this package.) >> >> I wrote this in May 2015. >> Then, in May 2016, I orphaned the package. > [...] >>

Bug#786808: RFA: adequate -- Debian package quality testing tool

2019-03-01 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Jakub, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >>I request an adopter for the adequate package. (Note that RFA != > >>O. Talk to me before taking over this package.) > > I wrote this in May 2015. > Then, in May 2016, I orphaned the package. [...] > [...], so there wasn't anything for me to > object. Ah, sorry,

Bug#842943: feasibility of packaging signal-desktop

2019-03-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
I have given signal-desktop a first look. In terms of dependencies, apart from electron (ehm...) this is what I found: - to be updated: 1. node-chalk: 2.3.0 -> 2.4.1 2. node-espree: 3.5.1 -> 3.5.4 3. node-filesize: 3.5.11 -> 3.6.1 4. node-got: 7.1.0 -> 8.2.0 5. node-he: 1.1.1 -> 1.2.0

Bug#673950: marked as done (O: ripole -- Extract attachments from OLE2 data files (ie, MS Office docs))

2019-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 02 Mar 2019 06:50:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923536: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #673950, regarding O: ripole -- Extract attachments from OLE2 data files (ie, MS Office docs) to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#668115: marked as done (RFA: bzr-pipeline -- Bazaar plugin for managing a pipeline of changes)

2019-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 02 Mar 2019 06:46:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923435: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #668115, regarding RFA: bzr-pipeline -- Bazaar plugin for managing a pipeline of changes to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: add blocking bug

2019-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 842943 by 923512 Bug #842943 [wnpp] RFP: signal-desktop -- standalone JS desktop client for Signal Messenger 842943 was blocked by: 842420 842943 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 842943: 923512 > End of message, stopping

Processed: Bug #922808 in schleuder-gitlab-ticketing marked as pending

2019-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #922808 [wnpp] ITP: schleuder-gitlab-ticketing -- filter plugin to hook Schleuder into a GitLab issue tracker Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #922808 to the same tags previously set -- 922808:

Bug#722345: Bundled version of snappy in libcompress-snappy [RFP]

2019-03-01 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:37:29 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > On 2019-02-23 19:44, gregor herrmann wrote: > > I see that the package is ready in git; are we sure that this patch, > > which I threw together quickly some years ago, is correct (beyond > > making the build+test pass)? > The patch seems

Processed: limit package to wnpp, tagging 722345

2019-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit package wnpp Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp' Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp' > tags 722345 + pending Bug #722345 [wnpp] ITP: libcompress-snappy-perl -- Compress::Snappy - Perl interface to

Bug#722345: Bundled version of snappy in libcompress-snappy [RFP]

2019-03-01 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2019-03-01 15:57, gregor herrmann wrote: > I've uploaded the package to NEW now; let's see how it behaves :) Great, thanks a lot! :) Andrius -- Andrius Merkys Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325 LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania signature.asc Description:

Bug#923300: ITP: golang-github-openshift-imagebuilder -- Builds Dockerfile using the Docker client

2019-03-01 Thread Reinhard Tartler
That sounds really promising. I wonder how to implement it for this package. The yquake2 package uses gbp-buildpackage, pristine-tar and mk-origtargz, which I would love to continue using. Unlike yquake2, this package doesn't combine two seperate git repositories, but both sources come from the

Bug#786808: RFA: adequate -- Debian package quality testing tool

2019-03-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Axel Beckert , 2019-03-01, 01:12: Jakub Wilk wrote: I request an adopter for the adequate package. (Note that RFA != O. Talk to me before taking over this package.) I wrote this in May 2015. Then, in May 2016, I orphaned the package. In June 2016, Paul Wise declared his intention to adopt