Bug#203896: Processed: I'll take yydecode

2005-06-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-21 08:36]: sharutils contains the only uudecode in Debian, so I'm not sure what the commentor in the bug was talking about. OK, interesting. I guess I should go ahead and start preparing an updated package for yydecode. OK. -- Martin

Bug#203896: Processed: I'll take yydecode

2005-06-21 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Martin Michlmayr wrote: I currently use this package to handle yEnc files which pan proves unable to decode, e.g., because the first post is missing. Advantages over sharutils are, if nothing else, being less than an eighth the size. Can you please review bug #177370 and let me know whether

Bug#203896: Processed: I'll take yydecode

2005-06-21 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Martin Michlmayr wrote: sharutils contains the only uudecode in Debian, so I'm not sure what the commentor in the bug was talking about. OK, interesting. Yeah, maybe uudecode isn't the package he's talking about. apt-cache search yenc didn't help though. A quick check shows that we've had

Bug#203896: Processed: I'll take yydecode

2005-06-13 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Martin Michlmayr wrote: Can you please review bug #177370 and let me know whether it makes sense to keep this package (i.e. does uuencode/uudecode really have this functionality or not). The main thing I've used yydecode for is that it has managed to handle every broken, incomplete, mangled

Bug#203896: Processed: I'll take yydecode

2005-06-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I currently use this package to handle yEnc files which pan proves unable to decode, e.g., because the first post is missing. Advantages over sharutils are, if nothing else, being less than an eighth the size. Can you please review bug #177370 and let me know whether it makes sense to keep