Bug#821397: Fwd: sway 1.0-rc1
Hi, On 2/7/19 5:36 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Birger, > > On Wed 06 Feb 2019 at 12:00PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > >> Forgot to cc the bugreport: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 2/6/19 7:41 AM, Birger Schacht wrote: >>> But both swayidle and swaylock don't depend on wlroots, so i can start >>> with those. >> >> thats now #921496 and #921497. > > You need to set Maintainer: and Uploaders: to be the same as the sway > package, since we're doing a split. done! cheers, Birger > > I haven't done a full review yet. >
Bug#821397: Fwd: sway 1.0-rc1
Hello Birger, On Wed 06 Feb 2019 at 12:00PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > Forgot to cc the bugreport: > > Hi, > > On 2/6/19 7:41 AM, Birger Schacht wrote: >> But both swayidle and swaylock don't depend on wlroots, so i can start >> with those. > > thats now #921496 and #921497. You need to set Maintainer: and Uploaders: to be the same as the sway package, since we're doing a split. I haven't done a full review yet. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#821397: Fwd: sway 1.0-rc1
Forgot to cc the bugreport: Hi, On 2/6/19 7:41 AM, Birger Schacht wrote: > But both swayidle and swaylock don't depend on wlroots, so i can start > with those. thats now #921496 and #921497. cheers, Birger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
