On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 08:40:13AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> cross-config exists solely to allow the removal of the dpkg-cross and
> libdebian-dpkgcross-perl binaries. Even then, the contents of
> cross-config could end up in other packages just as easily.
Yes, we should move cross-config to a
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 08:40:13AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> I could file 15 RC bugs against dpkg-cross for the flagrant
> disregard of ALL Debian Policy, if you really want proof of the
> abominations that hide within it.
file at least one?
> However, cross-config has none of
> those issues
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 06:33:06 +0200
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:30:35PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > this seems a fairly strong statement, considering
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dpkg-cross shows not a single bug
> > filed against the package.
I c
3 matches
Mail list logo