AM report for Jochen Voss

2001-03-15 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Summary report for Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Identity Jochen's GPG key is signed by Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in turn signed by Michael Meskes: pub 1024D/211B1025 1999-12-27 Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig! 211B1025 1999-12-27 Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Reaping non-advocated applicants

2001-03-15 Thread Ralf Treinen
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 07:47:21AM -0500, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:52:32PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > > > > Sounds like a good idea to me. But what to do with them? I think that > > > applicants that have not found an advo

Re: Reaping non-advocated applicants

2001-03-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Brian Russo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:10:17AM -0500, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 01:52:37AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote: > > > is it really that hard for a "good applicant" to get > > > advocated within a 4 week period? > > > > > > besides, they c

Re: Reaping non-advocated applicants

2001-03-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gopal Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010315 11:10]: > But then they have to get back to the back of the queue. I was ... > AM. This way the applicants retain their place in the queue and once > they get advocated, can be processed quicker. So everyone who considers becoming a Developer at some p

Re: Reaping non-advocated applicants

2001-03-15 Thread Brian Russo
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:10:17AM -0500, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 01:52:37AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote: > > is it really that hard for a "good applicant" to get > > advocated within a 4 week period? > > > > besides, they can always re-apply > > once they get advocated. > >

Re: Reaping non-advocated applicants

2001-03-15 Thread Gopal Narayanan
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 01:52:37AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 07:47:21AM -0500, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:52:32PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > > > > Sounds like a good idea to me. But what to do with them? I think that > > > applicants that

Re: What is the correct sentence in english (was: Debian WWW CVS: french)

2001-03-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 02:25:06PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > I would like to know if the log message I used for this mail makes sense in > english. I want to say that the translation was not so good, and that we've > maid a rewording to correct it. The log message was great. But you probably

What is the correct sentence in english (was: Debian WWW CVS: french)

2001-03-15 Thread Martin Quinson
Hello, this is a call to the native english speaker (and other which speak better english than me). I would like to know if the log message I used for this mail makes sense in english. I want to say that the translation was not so good, and that we've maid a rewording to correct it. Thanks, Mt.

Re: Reaping non-advocated applicants

2001-03-15 Thread Brian Russo
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 07:47:21AM -0500, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:52:32PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > > Sounds like a good idea to me. But what to do with them? I think that > > applicants that have not found an advocate after, say, 4 weeks should > > be removed.

Bug#89710: Broken link to general linux mailing lists

2001-03-15 Thread Ross Boylan
Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2001-03-15 Severity: minor http://www.debian.org/support says, near the top There are many other Linux mailing lists, which are not Debian-specific. Please refer to this index. This last two words are a hyperlink to http://oslab.snu.ac.kr/~djshin/lin