On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:32:18PM +0200, oliver.schmid...@t-online.de wrote:
You wrote that these hardening flags are individual for all packages.
So is it possible to see which packages have which build flags
enabled? (via the new package tracker or the package search).
In
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:30:02AM +0900, victory wrote:
# TODO: the text in the formats should be translatable (PO?)
# list of install manual output formats
Thanks for taking care of this issue. That was fast!
Regards
Javier
PS: Sorry for the mess I made with the English
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:59:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
These two links are referenced by the Debian security audit pages but
the domain has been taken by squatters.
I have modified the pages to
a) remove the point to http://shellcode.org/Setuid/, there is currently no
alternative (that I
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 05:54:40PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
a) remove the point to http://shellcode.org/Setuid/, there is currently no
alternative (that I know of)
I wonder if these pages could be an alternative?
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/setuid-binary.html
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:33:01AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
Is anything under http://www.debian.org/security/audit/ still
relevant? [I'm asking because of #648595.]
Yes, most under the audit/ dir is still relevant. Although:
- The old infrastructure provided by Steve Kemp is no longer
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 08:18:41AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:33:01AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
Is anything under http://www.debian.org/security/audit/ still
relevant? [I'm asking because of #648595.]
Yes, most under the audit/ dir is still
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:34:05AM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Who has taken this decision?
The web team (CCed) want to do this for quite some time already and
agreed about it last year during the sprint. We already began to take
care of these documentations one at a time when needed.
I'm
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:51:42AM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
Hi,
All links from La Espiral to OpenResources in
http://www.debian.org/international/Spanish.es.html are broken (I
guess old links)
Thanks for the reminder. I've reviewed the content of the web page and
removed references to
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your shop (DiscountLinuxDVD.com) was listed in the Debian web pages [1]
as a site that provided CDs/DVDs of Debian but we have received complaints
from some users of your service that they are not receving ordered DVDs.
Please, confirm if the DiscountLinuxDVD.com service to buy
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:57:02AM -0700, Ed Lane wrote:
I ordered Debian 6.0 from DiscountLinuxDVD.com on Sept. 2, 2011. I have
not received the order and they don't answer my emails. The site is
still up.
Dear Mr. Lane,
Thanks for contacting us and letting us know. We have sent a message to
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:49:07AM -0300, Ruben Acosta wrote:
Tengo el agrado de dirigirme a Uds, para consultar respecto a los
repositorios en terminos de hardware, es decir, el debian 6 no soporta
hardware viejo por lo tanto sigo recurriendo al lenny.
Cuando seteo el /etc/apt/sources.list de
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:30:21PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
If the vendor contacts us and indicates that they are still active we will
let you know.
Website team: My emails to sa...@discountlinuxdvd.com and to
d...@superiordata.net bounced.
I will wait to see if the online
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 09:23:29PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
(...)
remove it. deburl is also not working any more
I wonder: shouldn't we have an automate task to do this tasks? We have a
script at the website sources (testvendors.pl) written by Craig Small in 2001
which certainly looks
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 08:18:30PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Le 11/10/2011 19:53, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña a écrit :
Security Team: would you agree if I modified all the 2010 and 2011
advisories
to include a new tag (which would not be printed, yet) to make it possible
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:25:20AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
I have updated the testvendors.pl to make it possible to work with
vendors.CD. However, there is still room for improvement:
(...)
Even with these changes the script seems to work fine. I've run it and
reviewed
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 05:45:09PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Richard suggested a while ago automating checks around vendors :
- at submission time
- after submission
Hi Simon,
The testvendors.pl Perl script in the /CD/vendors/ dir was
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:26:31AM +0530, Rohit R wrote:
Hello,
First of all let me say, Good work with the new site !!
Here is my problem. The list of CD Vendors provided on
http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/, I feel is out-dated. I am from India, and
when I checked the links provided
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 12:06:34AM +0100, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
Hi all,
is my intent to proceed with a clean up of vendors listed on [1] and [2].
That's a good idea, I hope you are still interested in doing this :)
To do it, I'm trying to write down some requirements which vendors need to
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:38:27PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Thanks for your hint, Javier (author of the script used to generate
those) and the security team CCed to gather more information.
Hi,
I've reviewed this issue fully and have adjusted the Makefile to try to make it
more evident when
tag 636582 pending
reassign 636582 harden-doc
thanks
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:01:25AM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your report. Following up another bug alike, please note that
the securing howto is directly handle within the harden-doc debian
package.
Hello,
This bug
This might be related to the Alioth update, could someone please confirm they
get also this when comitting stuff:
jfs@silicio:international$ cvs ci (...)
Can't do setuid (cannot exec sperl)
cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
this happens to me
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:49:24PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
In future, it would be nice to maybe re-think what we put on which
CDs. Some people have suggested having a separate CD for docs, which
I'll admit I'm not such a fan of for a variety of reasons. I'm tempted
to suggest that we
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:46:56PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Quoting Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org:
Debian FAQ is DDP document still in debiandoc-sgml.
Between 2008-05-19 and 2008-10-03, I created a docbookified,
po4aified, and utf8ifed branch of the FAQ:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:02:33PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
It is great to have squeeze released and web pages in the new design.
It is not secret that Debian documentation pages can be reorganized to
make more important things to be more accessible. I would like to
update their
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:18:36PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Do you guys (from d-doc) see any possibility to help us with that?
Most of the documentation nowadays is built using Docbook although some
documents are still based on debiandoc-SGML. In any case, how can we help
you?
Regards
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 09:25:43PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
I cannot access www-master, could someone please take a look at this? If I'm
pointed to where the cron tasks reside and given access to www-master I could
probably take care of this myself
I was pointed
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 03:14:21PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Quoting Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org:
More problematic is:
http://www.debian.org/doc/docpolicy
Here, at least the following two points:
# We'll use SGML as source format.
(...)
# We'll use debiandoc-sgml for our
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:02:27PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
I guess contrib/ can be completely removed ?
I guess so, the content there is quite out dated. I can always recover it
from the Attic I guess.
Regards
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:37:40PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi list,
at http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20100730
Tenth Annual Debian Developer Conference
No, it's Eleventh - since first debconf was debconf*0*...
http://debconf0.debconf.org/
Hi,
Sorry to reopen this thread but I
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:46:02AM +0900, victory wrote:
I don't think it's not good to issue 'system cvs...' for each copypage. I
think this should be selectable to cancel (something like --no-cvs switch
will be enough)
Yes, that's a valid point. I can try to add that switch at some point in
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:07:07PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Hi there!
What's worst, translators working in CVS do not have an easy way to recover
removed/purged pages from CVS. It takes quite a lot of work (simplified only
with shell access to cvs.debian.org) to review which
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:02:56AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
While the new year changed there appeared webwml build errors because
of the missing oval definitions for the new year (because of no new DSA
yet). While digging around I found that the 2009 oval file is zero bytes
long
(CCing debian-i18n)
Hi guys,
I would like to request that the taks that removes the 'outdated' translated
web pages
from CVS by removing them is stopped.
Here's why:
- We already have a mechanism to warn of outdated (or very out of date pages)
- The sites see many cosmetic changes that
[ Just a small note so other affected teams can check if everything is working
OK ]
After pondering for weeks why changes committed to the www CVS in
spanish/international/spanish where not being compiled and visible at the
website yesterday I found (and fixed) a bug in the webwml's
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 08:28:25PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
Hello,
(CC'ing debian-l10n-spanish)
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 06:57:24PM +0200, Borja Gonzalez wrote:
So, in the page http://www.debian.org/releases/unstable/index.es.html
(spanish), in the secon paragraph there is a mistake,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:01:40AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
Dear Debian WWW maintainers,
The page http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=bastille has a link to
http://packages.debian.org/etch/bastille which, the last few times I've
tried it, has timed out (Safari gives me the message,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 04:13:43PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
RHEL and derivatives: 7 years
RHEL does offer support for 7 years, but that's paid-for support. Notice that
you *cannot* use official RHEL updates without paying for it (up2date
requires a paid subscription to Red Hat's Network).
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 04:13:09PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
Okay, so I went ahead and did this. Now /distrib/ no longer links to
the d-i mega-link-collection, and instead it links to those four pages,
each of which have their own link collection. It's still fairly consistent,
and the number
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 07:23:29PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
debian.fr is *NOT* an official mirror, and is operated by someone not
affiliated to Debian.
Many others issues on debian.fr (like /doc/ in error) have already been
reported. I've sent an email to the contact of the domain
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 11:11:21AM +0100, Rodolfo García wrote:
http://comprarlinux.com/index.php?main_page=product_infoproducts_id=1
says 15.
Os,
sorry, the web page in the debian-vendors-CD is
http://www.compralinux.com/ not http://www.comprarlinux.com/ and is 63
euros:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 01:35:14PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:27:48AM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
Could a 'debwww' member please approve for the installation of the
python2.4-xml package?
I do
Gruesse,
Over a month has gone since the original
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:58:49AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
In an $Id$ line there is only one version stored. We can extract that
in many other ways, too. The problem I tried to point out is with the
mindelta and maxdelta feature of the translation-check. If they are not
set maxdelta
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 06:21:24PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
I have some problems with this approach since being able to commit
to webwml means being able to execute arbitrary code on www-master
which is currently the same as security-master. Thus, having only
limited write access and a
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:15:34PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
What also comes into my mind, the translation-check code would require
quite a lot of changes with almost all VCSes especially with respect to
checks about by how many commits the file is outdated. Might
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 09:05:38AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Indeed. Moreover, the only advantage of svn seems to be that to an
end-user, it looks very similar as cvs.
It also supports symbolic links, proper file/directory renaming, etc.
All
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 07:38:26PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Alioth also supports CVS, so if you want to keep CVS, you can do that as
well. But I encourage you to switch to something else and I can help you to
convert the repository if needed.
As I've said in the -doc mailing list I'd
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 03:53:31PM +0200, m.v.wesstein wrote:
Hello
I found the link to http://manpages.debian.net/cgi-bin/search_man.cgi on
the page http://www.debian.org/doc/todo#ideas to be dead. The server
http://manpages.debian.net works as it displays the default Apache notice.
Yes,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 05:23:30PM +0200, David Richfield wrote:
Debian to purchase and maintain it's own computers - Debian to
purchase and maintain its own computers
Thank you, I've fixed this typo. Should show up online in a few hours.
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 05:06:45PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Attached is a first draft of such a page. I would appreciate input on this
information as I would like to add it to the website soonish. Please note
that it just states facts, it does not go into any opinions
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:45:29PM -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote:
Thank you very much, I fully agree that it is OK to apply your patch.
No problem. If somebody applies this, it might be nice to document this
somewhere as well: For files with non-standard extensions, the
extension must be added to
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 12:11:53PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
How do I do that? I see no README in the PO subdir that really describes the
process there... wmlxgettext.pl seems to do the job, but I have been unable
to get it working in my first two tries..
Aggg.. I was blind
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 02:32:05AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
As most developers (me included) are not very much aware of the status of
the
Debian trademark I believe it would be interesting to add a page to the
website
(CC'ing debian-project as there might be people in that list that might
have an opinion about this change)
As most developers (me included) are not very much aware of the status of the
Debian trademark I believe it would be interesting to add a page to the
website that described more information
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 06:45:43PM +0200, Johan Haggi wrote:
2 links in the version 1.3 of obsolete.wml are wrong:
Thanks. I've also fixed the references in the ddp.wml file so that they now
point to the obsolete file.
Regards
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:07:47PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Hi!
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070531 12:40]:
- post to d-a that the license is going to change in X months and that
contributors are going to be contacted. Provide pointers to anyone feels
he
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:58:43PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
And considering a lot of other people have infinite more
understading of Copyright issues, what should we do if we can't
find/contact the contributor and/or he/she decides to not relicense
it? Is it possible to remove the
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:08:25PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
I'm unsure if we should start contacting contributors and fix the long
standing license problem of the website.
What license problem? Everything is licensed to SPI, always has been.
I'm suprised you ask this. Have you read
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:25:31PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
- Our procedure for out-of-date pages is this, the log of removed
pages is here.
That would be nice, actually, an automatic mechanism that would mail the
l10n mailings everytime a batch of pages are
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
This means no content from the site can (legally) be copied over to, for
example, a GPL-licensed document (such as those produced by the DDP) or a
GPL program.
For reference, this is #192748 (which was cloned
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:20:40PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
I would like to know if we have a Web Policy or if we
should have one, some small lines, nothing complicate, just to
say:
There's no Policy AFAIK, just the documentation at
www.debian.org/devel/website/
As the one who originally introduced this page in 2002 but have not
maintained it I feel partially responsible for #425792.
I have done a full review of the content of this page, moving over to a
separate listing all the distributions which are no longer active (stalled,
server is dead or gives
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:09:23AM +0200, NAGY Viktor wrote:
Jens Seidel wrote:
It was already suggested multiple times to remember users choice of
the selected language. There where also some suggestions to a possible
implementation such as using cookies. Don't know about the status.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:31:00PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Translators also have good tools for handling gettext. What's more,
if we used gettext for more of the site, we could use nice web
translation frontends more easily. I'm not sure it's worthwhile, but
it seems a better
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:46:23AM +0200, Wojciech Zareba wrote:
Our company has used Debian since few yaears, but I never needed to visit
Debian pages for security updates, documetation, etc. I had only two
reasons: to read news about new releases and changes, and to download new
testing
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:33:43PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
* I don't believe we should favor XML(-ish stuff) above simplified
markup when the target audience are humans. XML is good for many things
but definitely not for being edited by the casual user. BTW there are
wiki engines
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:02:16AM +1000, Robert Lowe wrote:
Hi Debian-WWW,
There appears to be a problem with manpages.debian.net, as when I visit this
in my browser I'm redirected to http://manpages.debian.net/apache2-default/
serves a blank page that just says It works!.
Yes, It's
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 11:31:20AM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
When downloading install manual files (both pdf and txt), the files
are *.pdf.en instead of *.en.pdf. This means that, without translating,
they will not appear as pdf files.
Do you mean that your desktop will not recognise
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:03:52PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I have just upgraded a few servers, and frankly I would recommend
upgrading with apt-get instead of aptitude. As aptitude's own upgrade
path is broken, it is proposing insane upgrade scenarii unless you do as
described in the
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 07:10:27PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
An annoucement has been written with the help of the people on the
-publicity and -l10n-english mailing list. I think it would be ready to
be translated to other languages as well.
Then this should have been sent to -i18n
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:33:41PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
I know of work in progress on:
pt_BR
dk
Spanish is also in progress. Currently reviewing it.
Regards
Javier
PS: You should *really* use -i18n to coordinate translations, not -www. All
translation coordinators are
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 07:10:27PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
The announcement is available at
http://people.debian.org/~tolimar/release.txt (and soon .wml).
It would be great if you could translate it in time so the anouncement
would be in all kind of languages in place.
There's a few
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:33:41PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Hi again!
* Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070407 19:10]:
[..] http://people.debian.org/~tolimar/release.txt [..]
It would be great if you could translate it in time so the anouncement
would be in all kind of
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 04:17:08AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
- there *is* downtime, a new kernel needs to be installed and that requires
a reboot
Installing a new kernel doesn't *require* a reboot. Depends on whether you
like your downtime to be scheduled or unscheduled. ;)
Well
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:09:45PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hi.
It was suggested to set up a page again that can be used to test
the website's appearance after the etch release like we did before
sarge. I'm currently setting this up on of my servers again.
Notice that not only the
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:49:45PM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
Hi, I just saw that this page:
http://www.us.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-getting.en.html
which I got to by choosing 'site map' and then 'Support: Debian FAQ', says:
release 4.0, a.k.a. the `stable' distribution
I guess this
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:49:45PM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
Hi, I just saw that this page:
http://www.us.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-getting.en.html
It seems you are getting an outdated copy, for some reason, I don't see what
you see. Instead I see:
release 3.1, a.k.a. the `stable'
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:25:24AM +0100, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:49:45PM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
Hi, I just saw that this page:
http://www.us.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-getting.en.html
which I got to by choosing 'site map' and then 'Support: Debian FAQ', says:
Hi there,
I just wanted to mention that I have updated a *lot* of advisories today
changing CVE references in quite a number of .data files. Most of the changes
are related only to the CVE CANdidates name change. The CAN--XXX format
is no longer used, Mitre just uses the CVE-- format.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 04:49:50PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
That being said, attached is a patch to the current upgrade-report.html page
to add additional information (and do not make it depend on a specific Debian
release). I think it's worthwhile mentioning that the user's
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 10:48:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Roberto C. Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061224 02:10]:
A Google search for debian upgrade reports (no quotes) returns a page
[0] that is out of date since it is a template for a woody - sarge
-- [0] is
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:35:38PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
? That would generate HTML files that point to content that do no
exist in the any of the mirrors. The only way you can make those
file valids if you break into one of the mirrors, and if a mirror is
broken and you do not
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:33:30PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:21, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Waiting for comments...
sounds like a good plan to me.
I've applied the changes. They should be available in the next run.
Javier
signature.asc
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:57:30PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
[please CC me in replies, I'm not subscribed]
it's easy to do some code injection in packages.debian.org:
This is not code injection, it's cross site-scripting. Given that:
- packages.debian.org does not have any
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2006/12/11
Severity: minor
Tags: security
Christian Boltz reported in the debian-www mailing list [1] that the
download.pl CGI used in packages.debian.org is vulnerable to XSS attacks.
This seems to have been discovered by fefe [2]
I don't believe
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:11:34PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
Not that I wouldn't want to see this fixed but, really, this is as
low risk as it can get. Through XSS no one could retrieve user
credentials and no one should be trusting (in this day an age) the
information from a website
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:42:35PM +0100, Stefan Scheler wrote:
Fixed and uploaded, see #402631.
Erm, do you this is a good fix? You're only checking the length!
Please provide a demonstration attack that would force users into
downloading, and wrongly checking, a malicious package. The only
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:37:55AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
I've written a page titled How can you help Debian? which tries to describe
the different things a user, an experienced developer, a sysadmin, etc. can
do to help with the Debian project. It includes link to other
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:37:55AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Either I'm blind or I'm missing a page in the website that describes how
different people can contribute to the project.
I've written a page titled How can you help Debian? which tries to describe
the different
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:00:01AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 02 December 2006 10:10, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Any more opinions? Right now it's 3 (Holger, Jens and me) for vs. 2
(Josip, Frans) against [1]. It's too few opinions to make such a change
so I would like
I've reviewed the Spanish vendors list:
- Atilon Inet SL - DNS does not answer
- Ciberdroide - front page states it is out of business
- COMPU QUICK S.L. Informática Profesional - domain seems to have been
parked by an unrelated entity
- Frikibytes.com - redirects to a parked domain
Either I'm blind or I'm missing a page in the website that describes how
different people can contribute to the project.
I've written a page titled How can you help Debian? which tries to describe
the different things a user, an experienced developer, a sysadmin, etc. can
do to help with the
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 11:06:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:37:55AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Pe?a
wrote:
Either I'm blind or I'm missing a page in the website that describes how
different people can contribute to the project.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 11:43:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 23:06, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:37:55AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Pe?a
wrote:
Either I'm blind or I'm missing a page in the website that describes
how different people
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:01:24PM +0200, Augusto Frausin wrote:
Sorry, I do not know anything about web crumblers, is it something
similar (maybe clickable)? I use the up button of Konqueror to go up
but Firefox misses such a functionality IIRC.
Basically, if you go in a section then into a
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:11:50PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/setting-up has many
fixed references to Debian distribution code names where variables or
one of stable, testing and unstable should be used.
Since the page was written by
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:59:36PM +0200, jan sekal wrote:
Hi,
I tried to find out the version of KDE desktop, and the only result I got was
something like
http://packages.debian.org/stable/kde/kde,
whe it looks like the KDE was 5,
Well, you could look in the Release Notes and easily see
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 06:05:34PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
in my opinion, the web pages about speakers[1] and talks[2] given at
various conferences could use an overhaul. From several occasions
there also exist video or audio recordings which would be useful for a
web visitor, especially
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:25:51PM +, Miernik wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
The CSS code in http://www.debian.org/debian.css will always make the
page wider than browser window width, which results in an horizontal
scrollbar, for example in Konqueror:
This doesn't
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:54:11PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Here we basically have two choices.
Who's *we*? Have you talked to the security team or is this just wishful
thinking?
1. Certain people sign NDAs/agreements to get the early disclosure
information; in return they cannot
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 07:25:42AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 11:00:27AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
IMHO, it would be better to wait until wiki.d.o is DFSG-free, as I
expect readers would expect that from Debian's wiki.
That could take some
1 - 100 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
