Dear David,
thank you very much for improving the po4a coordination pages.
I'm sorry to say that I'm the origin of a special case that seems not to be
covered (yet).
Both the French and the German manpages are completely translated (1).
The French translation is listed correctly (2) as done,
Christian PERRIER wrote:
But:
The translation files go 'directly' to ftp.master and with this also
to stable, and policy is: stable is stable
That's the policy of 20th century...:)
Now, I can happily fix important bugs in some of my packages with
the SRM approval, so I don't see why
notfixed
unmerge 64
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice
- last entry: libreoffice-l10n-nb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
notfixed
unmerge 64
thanks
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice
- last entry: libreoffice-l10n-nb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
I would also suggest to change the header from
Packages currently being adopted
to something more appropriate and a threshold for the
duration of the adoption. E.g., xbae is 1851 days in adoption.
I suggest Packages recently adopted or something equivalent.
Regards
Martin
--
To
Hi David,
On the contrary, I wonder if this (and offering the page organized by
age) wouldn't be a good place to spot packages being adopted for a too
long time, so people may wish to take action. In this regard we could
also add (and organize by) last activity.
perhaps I misunderstood the
Hi Rhonda,
There's actually not much of a drawback here, translations already
_are_ at a rather low level, and there is next to no QA related measures
in the DDTSS: anonymous people click-review translations of anonymous
people without any chance to send over feedback or hints or blacklist
7 matches
Mail list logo
