Re: Etch errata

2007-05-30 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-28 21:49]: On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:38:45PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: I thought aptitude was the recommended frontend. In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are no complex dependencies to be resolved, you only

consistent usage of aptitude (was Re: Etch errata)

2007-05-30 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Wednesday 30 May 2007 16:39, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: I thought aptitude was the recommended frontend. In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are no complex dependencies to be resolved, you only upgrade existing packages and there should be no

Etch errata

2007-05-28 Thread Andrei Popescu
Hi, I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the recommended frontend. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you

Re: Etch errata

2007-05-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:33:56PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the recommended

Re: Etch errata

2007-05-28 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:33:56PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used in the example

Re: Etch errata

2007-05-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:38:45PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the recommended