* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-28 21:49]:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:38:45PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
I thought aptitude was the recommended frontend.
In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are no
complex dependencies to be resolved, you only
Hi,
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 16:39, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
I thought aptitude was the recommended frontend.
In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are
no complex dependencies to be resolved, you only upgrade existing
packages and there should be no
Hi,
I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I
know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used
in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the
recommended frontend.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:33:56PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I
know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used
in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the
recommended
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:33:56PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I
know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used
in the example
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:38:45PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I
know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used
in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the
recommended
6 matches
Mail list logo