Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-13 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 20:40 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > I have attached a new diff and the new resulting html file. > > This is a great band-aid to the current situation, thanks. Committed. Holger --

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 20:40 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > I have attached a new diff and the new resulting html file. This is a great band-aid to the current situation, thanks. Longer-term, we should look at making aspects of it automatically generated based on the list of arches in the

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-10 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 07/08/2016 07:20 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > > You are right, strictly spoken. > > But there are several "old and removed" ports in the "unofficial ports" > > section, > > like alpha or arm or hppa. > > To solve this, we

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-08 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 07/08/2016 07:20 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > You are right, strictly spoken. > But there are several "old and removed" ports in the "unofficial ports" > section, > like alpha or arm or hppa. > To solve this, we would need to create a third section like "Old/Removed > ports", > or the like.

Bug#828052: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-08 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> I think the status field saying "released", "discontinued" etc provides the > information with the current layout. > > Thanks for caring about the ports page. I marked the patches for review (in > my TODO) but couldn't find time :/ > Convert it to a wiki page. The work would have been done

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-08 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
Hi On 8 de julio de 2016 19:20:13 GMT+02:00, Holger Wansing wrote: >Hi, > >John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> >> >> > On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Holger Wansing > wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Holger Wansing

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-08 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > > On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Holger Wansing wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Jun

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-07 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Hi, > > Holger Wansing wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: The Ports wiki page

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-07 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > Paul Wise wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > > > The Ports wiki page (https://www.debian.org/ports/) appears to be out > > > of date. Its causing confusion among users and

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:18 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/25/2016 12:01 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: >> 2. And additionally to the issues mentioned above, it's even worse: >> >>2.1 There are more archs listed as "released", while they got >>

Debian WIki (was: Please update Ports wiki page)

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> 1. Please note that the page is not a wiki, as stated above. That's a good point. Perhaps the wiki page should have a mildly different style to differentiate them. Wiki's are a community effort at documentation, so it makes sense to ensure they are differentiated. Users know they can

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Holger Wansing wrote: >2.4 In german translation (maybe others too) for arm64 and ppc64el, >there seems to be an archicture name missing in the release-notes: >the headline says >"Hinweise zur Debian-Veröffentlichung Version 8 (Jessie)

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 06/25/2016 12:18 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/25/2016 12:01 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: >> 2. And additionally to the issues mentioned above, it's even worse: >> >>2.1 There are more archs listed as "released", while they got >>removed from Jessie: ia64, kFreeBSD

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 06/25/2016 12:01 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > 2. And additionally to the issues mentioned above, it's even worse: > >2.1 There are more archs listed as "released", while they got >removed from Jessie: ia64, kFreeBSD 64-bit, kFreeBSD 32-bit, >s390, and the already mentioned

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > The Ports wiki page (https://www.debian.org/ports/) appears to be out > > of date. Its causing confusion among users and maintainers. For > > example, a few bugs were reported for Sparc even

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > The Ports wiki page (https://www.debian.org/ports/) appears to be out > of date. Its causing confusion among users and maintainers. For > example, a few bugs were reported for Sparc even though Tokarev, a > QEMU--static maintainer, states

Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
as discontinued. Please update Ports wiki page