MR of pt_BR localization files for packages.d.o

Hi there, Webmaster team, In behalf of the Brazilian Portuguese localization team [1], I've done a MR to localize packages.d.o to pt_BR [2]. When possible, could you please accept the MR? [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Brasil/Traduzir [2] https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages

"List of files" links broken for arch:all packages on packages.d.o

Hi! Not sure if this is the perfect place for this, but I assume I'll get pointed in the right direxion if it isn't. As an example, go to https://packages.debian.org/sid/python-libevdev-doc whose [list of files] link goes to https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/python-libevdev-doc/filelist

Bug#346328: marked as done (packages.debian.org: packages.d.o is down message.)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Dec 2020 11:41:19 +0100 with message-id <24557.43727.428920.375...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #346328, regarding packages.debian.org: packages.d.o is down message. to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#514658: marked as done (sponsor recognition on packages.d.o)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Dec 2020 11:10:31 +0100 with message-id <24557.41879.453609.561...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #514658, regarding sponsor recognition on packages.d.o to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

packages.d.o unable to show binary packages content

Hello, take for example https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/python3-starlette/filelist , it only shows an error message "No such package in this suite on this architecture" ; this is happening for all the packages i look up, but it seems to be only affecting the `all` arch, f.e.

Re: packages.d.o: correct debian-policy links

Hi, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > attached is a patch to correct some broken debian-policy links on packages.d.o > > I will apply it shortly. Now pushed. > But I wonder if there is some special action needed, to get the site newly > built with such changings? What tr

packages.d.o: correct debian-policy links

Hi, attached is a patch to correct some broken debian-policy links on packages.d.o I will apply it shortly. But I wonder if there is some special action needed, to get the site newly built with such changings? What triggers the site build? I cannot find anything related in the webmaster-team

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Carsten Schoenert wrote: Hello Phil, Am 13.06.19 um 16:14 schrieb Phil Endecott: ... So the output of the search is mostly correct. I disagree; "Your keyword was too generic" suggests that there must be thousands of packages matching the search term, not zero. well, than you didn't have

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Michael, Am 13.06.19 um 16:35 schrieb Michael Kesper: [snip] >>>> But there are no backports of the gcc versions available! So the output >>>> of the search is mostly correct. > > I think packages.d.o. could be a little bit smarter here. > We _know_

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Phil, Am 13.06.19 um 16:14 schrieb Phil Endecott: ... >> So the output of the search is mostly correct. > > I disagree; "Your keyword was too generic" suggests that there must be > thousands of packages matching the search term, not zero. well, than you didn't have clicked on the link

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

questions. >> >> Unfortunately, that's the only address given visibly on the packages.d.o >> site: >> To report a problem with the web site, please e-mail our publicly archived >> mailing >> list debian-www@lists.debian.org in English. For other contact information,

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hi Carsten, Carsten Schoenert wrote: Hello Phil, This list is about the Debian websites and the maintenance of them, so unfortunately you are on the wrong list for asking such questions. For better fitting support channels please visit https://www.debian.org/support The error does come

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Michael, Am 13.06.19 um 15:47 schrieb Michael Kesper: >> This list is about the Debian websites and the maintenance of them, so> >> unfortunately you are on the wrong list for asking such questions. > > Unfortunately, that's the only address given visibly on

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

list is about the Debian websites and the maintenance of them, so> > unfortunately you are on the wrong list for asking such questions. Unfortunately, that's the only address given visibly on the packages.d.o site: To report a problem with the web site, please e-mail our publicly archived mailing list

packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Phil, you have chosen to create an also really generic subject! :) It a bit ironically as you complaining about the outcome while doing a package search. So I modified the subject to something more specific. Am 13.06.19 um 13:55 schrieb Phil Endecott: > Dear debian-www@lists.debian.org, >

Re: Packages.d.o src on Salsa? (Was: Re: A translation error in Chinese (simplified) version on https://packages.debian.org/)

nese/ > >Ack. As a Chinese user I think that fix is reasonable. I have committed >the >corresponding fix on git repo at >https://anonscm.debian.org/git/webwml/packages.git. > >Besides, I think that typo might not be the biggest problem. I know >that >packages.d.o source code was ho

Packages.d.o src on Salsa? (Was: Re: A translation error in Chinese (simplified) version on https://packages.debian.org/)

packages.git. Besides, I think that typo might not be the biggest problem. I know that packages.d.o source code was hosted under Alioth webwml group. However, I really have no idea that where was it migrated after the Alioth decommission. Basically I am raising two issues here: * Where was

Re: PTS link missing on packages.d.o

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > that is very ouch. It looks completely different, and its UI > makes it hard to find things, I am very happy with p.qa.d.o. Hmm, the UI seems like it is almost exactly the same to me. > To whom do I have to talk to revert this decision

Re: PTS link missing on packages.d.o

Hello, > packages.qa.d.o is deprecated and will eventually go away once > tracker.d.o supports everything packages.qa.d.o does, so I don't think that is very ouch. It looks completely different, and its UI makes it hard to find things, I am very happy with p.qa.d.o. To whom do I have to talk to

Re: PTS link missing on packages.d.o

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:38 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/libidn2 (for example) > has a number of links on the right, e.g. “Bug Reports”, > “Developer Information”, etc. > > There used to be a link to packages.qa.d.o/libi/libidn2.html > there, which seems

PTS link missing on packages.d.o

Hi, https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/libidn2 (for example) has a number of links on the right, e.g. “Bug Reports”, “Developer Information”, etc. There used to be a link to packages.qa.d.o/libi/libidn2.html there, which seems to have vanished. Please re-add that link. Thanks, //mirabilos

Re: [PATCH] packages.d.o - Link about to team page

On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 10:27 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > From https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/webwml/packages.git/tree/INSTALL > it looks like simple "git pull" should be enough to regenerate the > content of static page. I've done a few `git merge` operations and now the file on the

Re: [PATCH] packages.d.o - Link about to team page

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:05 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > >> Subject: [PATCH] Link about to team page > > Applied to git master. Not sure how to deploy though. >From

Re: [PATCH] packages.d.o - Link about to team page

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:05 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] Link about to team page Applied to git master. Not sure how to deploy though. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

[PATCH] packages.d.o - Link about to team page

>From a9b7ddc98b2f6594cef0abb4f35f6e38cdf13684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anatoly techtonik Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 20:53:19 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Link about to team page This add tracker, list archives and IRC to communication channels --- static/about/index.tmpl | 3

packages.d.o broken

Hi, It seems packages.d.o is quite broken. 213.165.95.4 is fine, but 5.153.231.3 is only aware of experimental binary packages, as can be seen in the following screenshots: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2042276/Screenshots/5badc42c3cf79b006dac55b23f7cb5462ed62cf4.png https

Bug#207095: last change date not on packages.d.o

Hello Dan, in 2004 you wrote in a conversation with Thomas Hood: packages.debian.org: should give date of last update T T There is now a link to the Debian changelog, the first T entry of which gives the date on which the version was T created (more or less). Does this satisfy wish #207095 T

Bug#207095: last change date not on packages.d.o

Probably the least bandwith using way to find the date currently is to just check their directory entry in .../pool/... But OK maybe date isn't important to some people, so I'll just respect that, so you can close it if you like. But even Google play store and Apple app store all have latest

Bug#735553: packages.debian.org: unreleased, debports architectures make packages.d.o confusing

to see this information * debian develoeprs -- they are more likely to look at packages.qa.d.o for information about packages and porting * debports porters -- they have much better tools than packages.d.o to assess their porting efforts The current infrastructure sets up packages.d.o

Re: Support for oldstable should be reenabled on packages.d.o.

-=| Moritz Muehlenhoff, 10.05.2013 18:45:03 +0200 |=- now that wheezy is released, support for searching in oldstable needs to be activated on packages.debian.org again. Done. Will be online after next website rebuild. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Support for oldstable should be reenabled on packages.d.o.

Hi, now that wheezy is released, support for searching in oldstable needs to be activated on packages.debian.org again. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: packages.d.o: changelogs and ftp-master.metadata.d.o

On 05/01/2013 23:41, Simon Paillard wrote: -- On dak side, is it possible to extract metadata for binary packages, under $src/$binary_pkg/$version/changelog ? Changelogs can differ between architectures so this would have to include the architecture name as well. If we allow : we could use

packages.d.o: changelogs and ftp-master.metadata.d.o

Hi, I've updated packages.d.o to link to the current url scheme used by ftp-master.metadata.d.o, however there are some raising questions and issues. Providing metadata for binary packages == Perl packages.d.o used to extract and link to per binary packages

Re: packages.d.o: changelogs and ftp-master.metadata.d.o

? apache, permanent redirect, should be best. * maybe fit metadata url scheme to the one used previously by packages.d.o ? (see url difference below ?) It will ease update of programs that used to download changelogs from PDO. Don't see why? (Non working ATM) packages.d.o URL http

additional entries in Sources index (may affect UDD, PTS, packages.d.o)

Hi, I plan to add source packages that are only referenced via Built-Using to the Sources indices[1] so we include them on source CD images and mirrors maintained with debmirror. It might be useful to ignore these new packages and not show them on the PTS, in UDD (rmadison) or packages.d.o. Most

Re: broken links: packages.d.o + patch-tracker.d.o

Hi, (please be specific in your subject) On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:59:50AM +0200, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: On page http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/nut the following links of Debian Resources section are broken: Debian Changelog, Copyright File They are ok now, but that's surprising I

Re: broken links: packages.d.o + patch-tracker.d.o

* Simon Paillard spaill...@debian.org [2012-06-05 09:56:26 CEST]: Hi, (please be specific in your subject) On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:59:50AM +0200, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: On page http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/nut the following links of Debian Resources section are broken:

Re: broken links: packages.d.o + patch-tracker.d.o

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:09:35AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: * Simon Paillard spaill...@debian.org [2012-06-05 09:56:26 CEST]: On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:59:50AM +0200, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: On page http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/nut the following links of Debian Resources

Re: broken links: packages.d.o + patch-tracker.d.o

* Simon Paillard spaill...@debian.org [2012-06-05 16:37:01 CEST]: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:09:35AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: * Simon Paillard spaill...@debian.org [2012-06-05 09:56:26 CEST]: On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:59:50AM +0200, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: On page

Re: broken links: packages.d.o + patch-tracker.d.o

/stable-proposed-updates/nut_2.4.3-1.1squeeze2_i386.changes Ah, cool. So I would assume the missing changelog issue for security uploads sort-of fixed itself because of that workflow. Nice to know! (rmadison doesn't seem to know about s-p-u) That means packages.d.o uses the changelog instead

Re: Link to changelogs broken on packages.d.o

and points to: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/putty/current/changelog Can you please fix this in packages.d.o? Thank you. An other mystery: Currently vim is at version '2:7.3.363-1' in unstable but the last entry on http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/v/vim

Irritating error message when searching for squeeze backports kernel on packages.d.o

Hi, while the following URLs yield the expected results (Squeeze 2.6 Kernels, Squeeze Backports 2.6.38 kernels) http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=squeezearch=i386searchon=nameskeywords=linux-image-2.6

Re: copyright and changelog files not yet on packages.d.o

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:30:21PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:29:53 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: version 0.1.4 of package apt-listbugs was uploaded to unstable on last Saturday, and it's correctly shown at http://packages.debian.org/sid/apt-listbugs However,

Re: copyright and changelog files not yet on packages.d.o

On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:07:01 +0200 Simon Paillard wrote: [...] On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:29:53 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs_0.1.4/changelog

Re: copyright and changelog files not yet on packages.d.o

On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:29:53 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: Hi all, version 0.1.4 of package apt-listbugs was uploaded to unstable on last Saturday, and it's correctly shown at http://packages.debian.org/sid/apt-listbugs However, links to its copyright and changelog files seem to be still

Bug#599425: packages.d.o: do not say 200 OK on errors

tags 599425 +patch thanks Hi, On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 04:49:08PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal packages.d.o (and archive.d.n) say 200 OK even on errors. e.g.: | weasel@intrepid:~$ wget -S http://packages.debian.org/debian-volatile/dists/etch

Processed: Re: Bug#599425: packages.d.o: do not say 200 OK on errors

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 599425 +patch Bug #599425 [www.debian.org] packages.d.o: do not say 200 OK on errors Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 599425: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#614111: marked as done (packages.d.o: theme regression: table of binpkgs by architecture (colours, layout))

Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2011 21:16:02 +0100 with message-id 20110307201602.GA13390@violet and subject line Re: Bug#614111: packages.d.o: theme regression: table of binpkgs by architecture (colours, layout) has caused the Debian Bug report #614111, regarding packages.d.o: theme regression

Bug#614111: packages.d.o: theme regression: table of binpkgs by architecture (colours, layout)

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal I noticed a regression (actually two) in the list of binary pak- kages per architecture, for example on this page: ‣ http://packages.debian.org/sid/kdelibs5-dev It looks like this in Lynx (good):

Bug#613821: packages.d.o: Similar package link should not leave suite

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the links to related packages unter “Similar packages” lead to the search result page listing occurences of the similar packages in all suites. I would find it more natural and convenient if it would go to

Bug#600200: marked as done (packages.d.o: switch to API providing versioned screenshots)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:44:06 +0100 with message-id 20101109194406.ga32...@edna.deb.at and subject line Re: Bug#600200: packages.d.o: switch to API providing versioned screenshots has caused the Debian Bug report #600200, regarding packages.d.o: switch to API providing versioned

ftp.LT.d.o submission to packages.d.o

Hello dear debian-www team! We at ftp.LT.d.o would like to submit the mirror to 'packages.debian.org' package search and download pages. We strongly feel that our mirror, when included in the list, will help local and nearby users to locate and download required packages more quickly. The

Bug#600200: packages.d.o: switch to API providing versioned screenshots

Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-CC: Christoph Haas h...@debian.org The attached (untested) patch switches packages.d.o to the API that provides versioned screenshots. If the requested version does not exist it goes with the closest lower version. If no lower

Bug#599425: packages.d.o: do not say 200 OK on errors

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hey, packages.d.o (and archive.d.n) say 200 OK even on errors. e.g.: | wea...@intrepid:~$ wget -S http://packages.debian.org/debian-volatile/dists/etch/volatile/main/source/Sources.bz2 | --2010-10-07 16:48:10-- http://packages.debian.org/debian

Bug#596846: marked as done (packages.d.o: search of content in sid packages is broken)

Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 21:32:26 +0200 with message-id 20100918193226.ga15...@dedibox.ebzao.info and subject line Re: Bug#597236: packages.debian.org: searching by filename doesn't find anything in sid has caused the Debian Bug report #597236, regarding packages.d.o: search of content

Bug#596846: packages.d.o: search of content in sid packages is broken

Package: www.debian.org Searching for gettext.jar in squeeze returns the gettext [0] package and in sid nothing [1]. Both have the same version. According to Contents-amd64 [2] it is still there: | zgrep gettext.jar Contents-amd64.gz | usr/share/java/gettext.jar devel/gettext Anyone an idea

Re: debtags on packages.d.o

Hi! * David Prévot da...@tilapin.org [2010-08-26 16:56:03 CEST]: [I hope it is correct to use this list for this request, please, point me to the good one and my apologies if I'm wrong] It's the proper list. :) I uploaded debtags French translation on packages one and a half days

debtags on packages.d.o

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [I hope it is correct to use this list for this request, please, point me to the good one and my apologies if I'm wrong] Hi, I uploaded debtags French translation on packages one and a half days ago, but it doesn't seems to be used at all. Is there

Re: debtags on packages.d.o

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:56:03AM -0400, David Prévot wrote: [I hope it is correct to use this list for this request, please, point me to the good one and my apologies if I'm wrong] This is the right list. I uploaded debtags French translation on packages one and a half days ago, but it

screenshot.debian.net use from packages.d.o: some optimisation ?

Hi, Now packages.debian.org displays the thumbnail (#262617), I feel the package loading is quite slow: * when no thumbnail is available, every thumbnail is still downloaded - one can use a redirect instead of 404 (easy) - provide a list of packages with pictures (need more changes) * png

Bug#562153: changelogs on packages.d.o broken? (no, not the usual delay)

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:45:02AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: I've seen other bug reports related to this issue, but they seem older and more related to the fact that changelog are not _always_ up to date. I'm not asking that, a scheduled update is more than reasonable, but I've the

Bug#562153: changelogs on packages.d.o broken? (no, not the usual delay)

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 06:50:43PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: @powell$ find /srv/packages.debian.org/www/changelogs/pool/main -name changelog.html -a -mtime -6 doesn't return anything. The last changelogs were generated for main on 16th Dec. non-free and contrib are not affected. From

Bug#562153: changelogs on packages.d.o broken? (no, not the usual delay)

://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/f/file/current/changelog 4 days ago the package was uploaded, but it does not appear yet in the changelog of packages.d.o. I've seen other bug reports related to this issue, but they seem older and more related to the fact that changelog are not _always_ up

Bug#562153: changelogs on packages.d.o broken? (no, not the usual delay)

retitle 562153 packages.debian.org: extraction of changelogs of packages from main broken since 16th Dec thanks Hi Stefano, On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:45:02AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: important it seems that recently (1 week to 10 days?) the

Processed: Re: Bug#562153: changelogs on packages.d.o broken? (no, not the usual delay)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 562153 packages.debian.org: extraction of changelogs of packages from main broken since 16th Dec Bug #562153 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: changelogs broken (no, not the usual delay) Changed Bug title to 'packages.debian.org:

Bug#440641: packages.d.o: patch for debports/etc explanation links

tags 440641 + pending thanks On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:24:47PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 20:51 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: The patch provided in this bug is now applied, but I will not close it yet since I think the situation could still be improved, e.g. by links to

Processed: Re: Bug#440641: packages.d.o: patch for debports/etc explanation links

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 440641 + pending Bug #440641 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: explain debports, contrib, non-free, volatile, etc Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Re: Changelogs on packages.d.o are not updated anymore

Hello, On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 01:00:05PM +0200, Michael Bienia wrote: while looking at some changelogs linked from the PTS for some recent uploads I discovered that they aren't updated anymore. Checking some more packages it seems to have stopped around 2009-05-24. While uploads from

Changelogs on packages.d.o are not updated anymore

Hello, while looking at some changelogs linked from the PTS for some recent uploads I discovered that they aren't updated anymore. Checking some more packages it seems to have stopped around 2009-05-24. While uploads from 2009-05-23 have an updated changelog [1], uploads after 2009-05-24 are

Bug#514658: sponsor recognition on packages.d.o

Am Montag, den 09.02.2009, 23:12 +0100 schrieb Peter Palfrader: Package: www.debian.org Version: 2009-02-09 Severity: normal all pages on packages.d.o give credit to our kind sponsors in a footer. The only exception is the entry page, http://packages.debian.org/ because it is a redirect

Bug#514658: sponsor recognition on packages.d.o

Gerfried Fuchs schrieb am Dienstag, dem 10. Feber 2009: all pages on packages.d.o give credit to our kind sponsors in a footer. The only exception is the entry page, http://packages.debian.org/ because it is a redirect to http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages and there is no pointer

Bug#514658: sponsor recognition on packages.d.o

* Peter Palfrader wea...@debian.org [2009-02-10 13:13:25 CET]: Gerfried Fuchs schrieb am Dienstag, dem 10. Feber 2009: all pages on packages.d.o give credit to our kind sponsors in a footer. The only exception is the entry page, http://packages.debian.org/ because it is a redirect

Bug#514658: sponsor recognition on packages.d.o

Package: www.debian.org Version: 2009-02-09 Severity: normal So, all pages on packages.d.o give credit to our kind sponsors in a footer. The only exception is the entry page, http://packages.debian.org/ because it is a redirect to http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages and there is no pointer

[PATCH] Traditional Chinese translation of packages.d.o

Hi, Attached is the Traditional Chinese translation of packages.debian.org in patch format. Someone please apply it, thanks! Regards, Kanru 0001-Add-Traditional-Chinese-translation.patch.gz Description: Binary data signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: packages.d.o: 264589: please link to manpages.d.n

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 264589 packages.d.o: please link to manpages on manpages.d.n Bug#264589: www.debian.org: Online manpages, preferably linked by package? Changed Bug title to `packages.d.o: please link to manpages on manpages.d.n' from `www.debian.org: Online

Bug#264589: packages.d.o: 264589: please link to manpages.d.n

retitle 264589 packages.d.o: please link to manpages on manpages.d.n thanks I think it would be a good idea for packages.d.o to link to the HTML versions of Debian manpages provided at manpages.debian.net. Firstly the package contents pages should link the manual page path names

Processed: Re: packages.d.o: 442083: remaining i18n issues

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 442083 + patch Bug#442083: packages.debian.org: [i18n] several i18n related issues There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#442083: packages.d.o: 442083: remaining i18n issues

tags 442083 + patch thanks On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 15:27 +0900, Paul Wise wrote: The list of languages down the bottom does not point to the DDTP project to encourage people to translate package descriptions. Here is a naive patch for this. It places the DDTP advertisement just below

Bug#442083: packages.d.o: 442083: remaining i18n issues

The remaining i18n issues with packages.d.o seem to be: The list of languages down the bottom does not point to the DDTP project to encourage people to translate package descriptions. The URLs in the list of Similar packages on the right sidebar does not include the current language for the page

Processed: packages.d.o: patch for debports/etc explanation links

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 440641 + patch Bug#440641: packages.debian.org: explain debports, contrib, non-free, volatile, etc Tags were: confirmed Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#440641: packages.d.o: patch for debports/etc explanation links

tags 440641 + patch thanks On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 20:51 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: The patch provided in this bug is now applied, but I will not close it yet since I think the situation could still be improved, e.g. by links to more verbose information. The attached patch fixes this and

mathomatic/exp at packages.d.o generates a 404 for copyright file

Hello, on the experimental page[1] of mathomatic, the copyright link[2] is broken, while on the sid one[3] it works fine[4]; checking another package, python-pp[5], its copyright file is visible[6]. May you please give it a look? TIA, Sandro [1]

Re: packages.d.o serves content in the wrong language

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:30:06PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: http://packages.debian.org/etch/wordpress shows me the package descriptions in French, while my request is: GET /etch/wordpress HTTP/1.0 Host: packages.debian.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;

packages.d.o serves content in the wrong language

Hi, http://packages.debian.org/etch/wordpress shows me the package descriptions in French, while my request is: GET /etch/wordpress HTTP/1.0 Host: packages.debian.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080208 (Debian-1.8.1.12-1) Galeon/2.0.4 (Debian

Re: packages.d.o/pkgname - stable

On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 22:57 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:37:53PM +0100, Franklin PIAT wrote: On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 17:12 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:42:19AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: The idea of making packages.d.o

packages.d.o/pkgname - stable

Hello, the new packages.d.o is awesome. Thanks to everyone who made it possible. I'd like to suggest that packages.d.o/pkgname goes directly to packages.d.o/stable/pkgname instead of the current disambiguation page. Each proper package page has all the suites listed across the top anyway

Re: packages.d.o/pkgname - stable

On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:42:19AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: I'd like to suggest that packages.d.o/pkgname goes directly to packages.d.o/stable/pkgname instead of the current disambiguation page. Each proper package page has all the suites listed across the top anyway, and making

Re: packages.d.o/pkgname - stable

also sprach Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.12.14.1712 +0100]: 1) You only get an exact hit 2) You get an exact hit plus some substring matches 3) You only get substring matches 4) You don't get any hits Does your proposal only concern case 1 or case 1 and 2? Only 1 really, I

Re: packages.d.o/pkgname - stable

Hi, On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 17:12 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:42:19AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: The idea of making packages.d.o appearance and behaviour configurable via cookies is on my to be considered list for quite a while already, yeah. I've mostly

Re: packages.d.o/pkgname - stable

On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:22:31PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.12.14.1712 +0100]: 1) You only get an exact hit 2) You get an exact hit plus some substring matches 3) You only get substring matches 4) You don't get any hits Does

Re: packages.d.o/pkgname - stable

On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:37:53PM +0100, Franklin PIAT wrote: On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 17:12 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:42:19AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: The idea of making packages.d.o appearance and behaviour configurable via cookies is on my

packages.d.o compares ~ diferently than dpkg

jim:~% dpkg --compare-versions 0.4.1-1 '' 0.4~ jim:~% echo $? 1 Then go to: http://packages.debian.org/sid/griffith and note that python-sqlalchemy (0.4.1-1) is accepted as ( 0.4~) -- Voy a salir cuando muera O caiga el gran imperio. Guantanamero, soy preso guantanamero. -- To

Status Update packages.d.o L10N (was: Translating packages.debian.org (Call for translations))

Status update: On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:44:00PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:04:49AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: As most of you might have noticed, packages.debian.org has gone through quite some changes in the last months. After this has now stabilized

Re: Translating packages.d.o

Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 10:29:57AM +0300, Tommi Vainikainen wrote: First, there is charset problems. If you open http://p.d.o/sid/, it contains something like this: meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=fi_FI.UTF-8 Obviously

Re: Translating packages.d.o

On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 07:18:35PM +0300, Tommi Vainikainen wrote: It seems that the bug applies to Dutch and Finnish. The common factor seems to be that conf/apache.conf(.sed.in) contains AddCharset ISO-8859-1 for those languages. Also if HTTP Content-Type header is correct, then HTML meta

Bug#364312: marked as done (www.debian.org: new packages.d.o/changelog:$PACKAGE doesn't work with libraries)

code version on packages.debian.org today and I believe it fixes the following bugs: #87725: packages.debian.org: suggesting new links to access package web pages Package URLs don't need to include the section anymore. #364312: www.debian.org: new packages.d.o/changelog:$PACKAGE doesn't

Bug#362703: marked as done (packages.d.o: package database is lagging behind unstable)

Package URLs don't need to include the section anymore. #364312: www.debian.org: new packages.d.o/changelog:$PACKAGE doesn't work with libraries The changelog package map is now updated more reliably. #402911: md5sum is part of the url of packages.debian.org

Bug#429930: packages.d.o: version information outdated for stable on index page

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal http://packages.debian.org/src:ekg shows 1:1.5+20050411-5 in stable, while http://packages.debian.org/stable/source/ekg shows the correct version, which was uploaded almost a year ago.. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable

Bug#429930: marked as done (packages.d.o: version information outdated for stable on index page)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:31:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#429930: packages.d.o: version information outdated for stable on index page has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

packages.d.o: amd64 is now an official arch (was: 404 for packages)

-12etch1_amd64.debmd5sum=54b74bc3ba1204317c68bdf7a0d017e1arch=amd64type=unofficial all download mirrors lead to 404s. Thanks again for the notice. The fact that amd64 is now an official architecture hosted by official mirrors was not taken into account. The packages.d.o CVS has just been updated

  1   2   3   >