* Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-06 15:23]:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 04:22:46PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
There is one thing that annoys me a little bit: The partnerdesc tag
defines a non-block command around the input (namely small) which
breaks HTML if you use a block
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-06 15:59]:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:11:36PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Can it be converted from 8-bit/color RGBA (truecolor) to maybe something
like 8-bit colormap (indexed) or such? Everyone says png is sooo much
better than gif, but if you really
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 04:22:46PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Please find attached a patch that fixes the HTML for the recently added
credativ entry for the partners page.
There is one thing that annoys me a little bit: The partnerdesc tag
defines a non-block command
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:52:34PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Who put credative on the partners page? and why ??
I added them at the request of tbm. Would you like me to remove
them while this is sorted out?
Right, that was me in my function as DPL. I noticed they were not
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:11:36PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Can it be converted from 8-bit/color RGBA (truecolor) to maybe something
like 8-bit colormap (indexed) or such? Everyone says png is sooo much
better than gif, but if you really like to compare png to gif you have to
stick with
* Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-04 15:48]:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:05:58AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
A little bit smaller, but not really what I was talking about. There are
not enough colors in the image that would justify using RGBA instead of
a colormap. This would recude the
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:07:06AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
You _do_ know that our convert doesn't do LWZ compression on gif
images? What's wrong with converting it to 256 colors but sticking with
the original format? Why switch from png to gif just to get 256 colors?
IDGI.
mogrify
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:25:10PM -0700, Jim Westveer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
On Thursday 04 September 2003 03:48 pm, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:05:58AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
A little bit smaller, but not really what I was talking
* Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-05 04:32]:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:07:06AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
mogrify -colors 256 skolelinux.png
Doing so appears to change the background color to black. Is
there a way to keep it white?
From reading the manpage -background white
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 02:45:50PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-05 04:32]:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:07:06AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
mogrify -colors 256 skolelinux.png
Doing so appears to change the background color to black. Is
there a
* Jim Westveer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-04 09:42]:
Who put credative on the partners page? and why ??
I added them at the request of tbm. Would you like me to remove
them while this is sorted out?
Right, that was me in my function as DPL. I noticed they were not
listed although they
Hi!
Please find attached a patch that fixes the HTML for the recently added
credativ entry for the partners page.
There is one thing that annoys me a little bit: The partnerdesc tag
defines a non-block command around the input (namely small) which
breaks HTML if you use a block command
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
On Thursday 04 September 2003 07:22 am, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Please find attached a patch that fixes the HTML for the recently added
credativ entry for the partners page.
There is one thing that annoys me a little bit: The
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:50:06AM -0700, Jim Westveer wrote:
Who put credative on the partners page? and why ??
I added them at the request of tbm. Would you like me to remove
them while this is sorted out?
--
Matt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
On Thursday 04 September 2003 09:26 am, you wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:50:06AM -0700, Jim Westveer wrote:
Who put credative on the partners page? and why ??
I added them at the request of tbm. Would you like me to remove
them while this
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:42:27AM -0700, Jim Westveer wrote:
Well, I probably suffer from some sort of memory
problem, but I dont remember the partners group
discussing Credative. Nor does the entry on the
debian/partners page say what they have/are doing
to support the Debian project, as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
On Thursday 04 September 2003 10:09 am, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:42:27AM -0700, Jim Westveer wrote:
Well, I probably suffer from some sort of memory
problem, but I dont remember the partners group
discussing Credative. Nor
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 04:22:46PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
And, compared to the other logos, isn't the credativ logo _way_ too
huge?
I haven't been paying attention... whoever put that there without resizing
please clean up after yourself.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
* Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-04 10:09]:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:42:27AM -0700, Jim Westveer wrote:
Well, I probably suffer from some sort of memory
problem, but I dont remember the partners group
discussing Credative. Nor does the entry on the
debian/partners page say what they
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:31:19PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 04:22:46PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
And, compared to the other logos, isn't the credativ logo _way_ too
huge?
I haven't been paying attention... whoever put that there without resizing
please clean
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:11:36PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Uhm, rather resize it, pretty please. The image is 42k big which the
users must download otherwise.
OK. I'll commit the scaled image this evening. It's 9k.
What brings me to the skolelinux logo. It's 20k but doesn't have that
* Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-04 13:36]:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:11:36PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
What brings me to the skolelinux logo. It's 20k but doesn't have that
much valueable informations in it. Can it be converted from 8-bit/color
RGBA (truecolor) to maybe something
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:05:58AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
A little bit smaller, but not really what I was talking about. There are
not enough colors in the image that would justify using RGBA instead of
a colormap. This would recude the size of the png images significant,
IMNSHO. None
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
On Thursday 04 September 2003 03:48 pm, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:05:58AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
A little bit smaller, but not really what I was talking about. There are
not enough colors in the image that would justify
24 matches
Mail list logo
