On Wed,23.Sep.09, 13:22:18, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> That would be an extremely interesting approach, I though fear of some
> limitations of po(4a) here with either getting huge chunks in the
> message catalogue or losing the posibility to rearange parts of the text
> or adding additional parts w
* Andrei Popescu [2009-09-14 22:05:06 CEST]:
> On Mon,14.Sep.09, 11:26:37, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > > I was trying to see where the current state of some
> > > files were and noticed we have (at least) two version
> > > control s
* Jon Dowland [2009-09-14 12:26:37 CEST]:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > I was trying to see where the current state of some
> > files were and noticed we have (at least) two version
> > control systems going on here.
>
> Is now a good time to move to git
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:05:06PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,14.Sep.09, 11:26:37, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > > I was trying to see where the current state of some
> > > files were and noticed we have (at least) two version
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:15:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> There were experiments to switch to svn instead of cvs, probably that's
> why you see newer files.
Ah ha, and of course the files I checked were Richard's, and they
happened to be just the ones that were in the wrong spot.
> CVS is
On Mon,14.Sep.09, 11:26:37, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > I was trying to see where the current state of some
> > files were and noticed we have (at least) two version
> > control systems going on here.
>
> Is now a good time to move to
Richard Atterer wrote:
> Aaargh - I just realized I have been happily making updates to the CD
> vendor list in the _SVN_ repo in the last weeks! I thought we'd switched
> to SVN and never bothered to check whether my changes appeared on
> www.d.o.
As (AFAIK) there is no active work being done on
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:20:06PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> Aaargh - I just realized I have been happily making updates to the CD
> vendor list in the _SVN_ repo in the last weeks!
Turned out to be just one commit of english/CD/vendors/vendors.CD, which
I manually inspected and moved over
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:15:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,14.Sep.09, 16:59:32, Craig Small wrote:
> > Which one is the correct one to use? And if it is not cvs.d.o then
> > someone needs to update the documentation at
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs
>
> CVS is corr
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> I was trying to see where the current state of some
> files were and noticed we have (at least) two version
> control systems going on here.
Is now a good time to move to git? :-)
(sorry)
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
On Mon,14.Sep.09, 16:59:32, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello,
> I was trying to see where the current state of some files were and
> noticed we have (at least) two version control systems going on here.
>
> http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/webwml/trunk/webwml/
> and
> http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/webwml/
Hello,
I was trying to see where the current state of some files were and
noticed we have (at least) two version control systems going on here.
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/webwml/trunk/webwml/
and
http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/webwml/
Now the website information seems to say cvs.d.o is the cur
12 matches
Mail list logo
