Bug#123587: opensource.org not mentioned on /intro/free

2001-12-12 Thread Grant Bowman
Package: www.debian.org On the page http://www.debian.org/intro/free there is no mention of www.opensource.org. This clearly should be added even if it's not a featured site because I think most Linux people use this site as a reference when talking with those less knowledgable. Thanks, --

Re: Proposal for the redesign of www.debian.org/doc/

2001-12-12 Thread Craig Small
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 07:37:11PM -0500, Jeff Albro wrote: If you tell me what your pages are I be happy to take a look if you'd like. misc/merchandise distrib/vendors distrib/books (also nm.debian.org and search.debian.org but they're a bit fiddly to do things on) - Craig -- Craig Small

Re: rebuild web site after each commit

2001-12-12 Thread Craig Small
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 05:36:33PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: Would it be possible to add a hook so that the web site is rebuilt after each commit, or would this overload klecker? Technically yes I know this is possible because I have something happening with each commit on a cvs'ed website at

Re: Proposal for the redesign of www.debian.org/doc/

2001-12-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:01:06PM +1100, Craig Small wrote: If you tell me what your pages are I be happy to take a look if you'd like. misc/merchandise distrib/vendors distrib/books ~~~ That's doc now. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Re: [oferk@oren.co.il: debian]

2001-12-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:49:31PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote: FWIW, maybe it is not even a good idea to separate the list of CD vendors (on www.d.o) from the rest of the CD information (on cdimage.d.o)? That may make sense from an organizational point of view, but it is less user-friendly.

Re: rebuild web site after each commit

2001-12-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 05:36:33PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: Would it be possible to add a hook so that the web site is rebuilt after each commit, or would this overload klecker? Maybe it wouldn't _overload_ it, but it sure wouldn't make life easy on it. And BTW if someone touches the core

Re: Installation Instructions link

2001-12-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:09:12PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: What is the proper mailing list for this be discussed? This discussion should be moved there. Well, this is debian-www :) I'd like to see each of the links at the top of the page be to a separate page: * General

Bug#123588: search.debian.org instructions link

2001-12-12 Thread Grant Bowman
Package: www.debian.org The Intro page has a link to http://www.debian.org/intro/search but search.debian.org does not!? Clearly search.debian.org should have a link to instructions on how to use it. Thanks, -- -- Grant Bowman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#102214: package page should offer link to changelog.Debian !

2001-12-12 Thread Christophe Boyanique
This will be definitively helpfull.

Re: [oferk@oren.co.il: debian]

2001-12-12 Thread peter karlsson
Josip Rodin: (Note also that we can make symlinks /cd, /CDs, /cds etc for those who can't remember the exact form :) we do this for /international and /mirror already) Even better would be to have permanent redirects for these (if that's possible with the mirroring structure we have). Symlink

Re: Installation Instructions link

2001-12-12 Thread peter karlsson
Josip Rodin: I'll have to change the links to releases/stable/#new-inst for woody anyway, so why not start now. I'd rather see it wasn't changed until woody's release. Wise from the potato release, we could fix all these links on a branch, and update all the translations on that branch, and

Bug#123588: marked as done (search.debian.org instructions link)

2001-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:51:20 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#123588: search.debian.org instructions link has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by finnish: webwml/finnish/intro about.wml

2001-12-12 Thread peter karlsson
Debian WWW CVS: Modified files: finnish/intro : about.wml Log message: changed marks to euros Hmm, but should the disbelief question really say thousands of euros? Shouln't that scale to hundreds or something? :) Reminds me that I should add euros to the Swedish translation as

Bug#123587: opensource.org not mentioned on /intro/free

2001-12-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:51:43PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: Package: www.debian.org On the page http://www.debian.org/intro/free there is no mention of www.opensource.org. This clearly should be added even if it's not a featured site because I think most Linux people use this site as a

problem on a www.debian.org page

2001-12-12 Thread Benoit Rouits
Hello, just a word to say that none of the links work in page : http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-fr Thanks, Ben -- Benoit Rouits [EMAIL PROTECTED] office : (+33)146398261 home : (+33)672814789

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by finnish: webwml/finnish/intro about.wml

2001-12-12 Thread Ville Tervo
peter karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Debian WWW CVS: Modified files: finnish/intro : about.wml Log message: changed marks to euros Hmm, but should the disbelief question really say thousands of euros? Shouln't that scale to hundreds or something? :) I was wondering

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by finnish: webwml/finnish/intro about.wml

2001-12-12 Thread peter karlsson
Ville Tervo: I was wondering same question while changing marks to euros. BTW. 6 FIM ~ 1 EUR so there is software worth thousands of euros. I'll change it to hundreds. It would sound more reasonable. I originally had hundreds of kronor in my Swedish translation (the original says a hundred

Re: Bug#123587: opensource.org not mentioned on /intro/free

2001-12-12 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:39:09 +0100 Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the page http://www.debian.org/intro/free there is no mention of www.opensource.org. This clearly should be added even if it's not a featured site because I think most Linux people use this site as a reference

Feedback for Craig Small on misc/merchandise:

2001-12-12 Thread Jeff Albro
Feedback for Craig Small on misc/merchandise: This page is easy to read, easy to scan, and accomplishes its mission. It's great! All I have for you is a few nitpicky improvements. I don't believe you need the horizontal rules to separate the different vendors. The paragraph grouping clearly

Re: [oferk@oren.co.il: debian]

2001-12-12 Thread Richard Atterer
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 11:30:13AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:49:31PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote: FWIW, maybe it is not even a good idea to separate the list of CD vendors (on www.d.o) from the rest of the CD information (on cdimage.d.o)? [snip] I agree, the

Re: [oferk@oren.co.il: debian]

2001-12-12 Thread Richard Atterer
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:49:49PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: When we first started distributing the iso images, we had a problem with people downloading them when that is not what they wanted. Thus, the wording above. Also, since bandwidth is donated, we need to be careful that we don't

Re: Installation Instructions link

2001-12-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:45:59PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: I'll have to change the links to releases/stable/#new-inst for woody anyway, so why not start now. I'd rather see it wasn't changed until woody's release. Wise from the potato release, we could fix all these links on a branch,

Re: [oferk@oren.co.il: debian]

2001-12-12 Thread Ted Cabeen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Atterer writes: On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:49:49PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: When we first started distributing the

Re: [steven.robbins@videotron.ca: a web suggestion]

2001-12-12 Thread Matt Kraai
Steve Robbins wrote: I am a maintainer, about to sign a key for a prospective maintainer, and I needed a refresher on that procedure. There is a lovely recipe on debian's page http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning but there is no direct link to it from the first place that I

Getting users an easy install without hammering the mirrors.

2001-12-12 Thread Jeff Albro
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Richard Atterer wrote: But IMNSHO obscuring the links is really the wrong approach! Information on a web site should not try to guide a visitor because we know better than him; everything should be described so that the *visitor* can decide what to do and get to the

Bug#123587: opensource.org not mentioned on /intro/free

2001-12-12 Thread Grant Bowman
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011212 10:51]: On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:51:43PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: Package: www.debian.org On the page http://www.debian.org/intro/free there is no mention of www.opensource.org. This clearly should be added even if it's not a featured site

Bug#123683: wrong link in http://www.debian.org/events/material

2001-12-12 Thread Christian Surchi
Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-12 Severity: normal Anand Kumria for the posters link in Credits section is wrong. It should be ~akumria and not ~akumdia.

Bug#123587: marked as done (opensource.org not mentioned on /intro/free)

2001-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:47:41 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#123587: opensource.org not mentioned on /intro/free has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#123683: marked as done (wrong link in http://www.debian.org/events/material)

2001-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:06:15 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#123683: wrong link in http://www.debian.org/events/material has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is