On Thu, 31 May 2007, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> I remember that some people complained about given their copyright
> to SPI (or $whoever), I think we should go with both options, I'm
> only afraid about having material licensed under incompatible
> licenses (could that happen?).
We'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2007 10:23 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Josip Rodin wrote:
>> It's unlikely that our web pages have much content for which there
>> isn't prior art, or simply common knowledge.
>
> Prior art isn't an issue, since it's not p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2007 11:08 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:20:40PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
> wrote:
>>
>> About a redesign
>>
>>
>> I think that should be done, from time to time, usi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2007 05:51 PM, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña:
>
>> Even though the timeframe for the removal is rather large (6 months)
>> it would be a nice addition to that service to have the actions e-mail
>> to translators' list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2007 11:03 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:00:38PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
>> The current system was implemented by Josip recently, and is a big
>> improvement over the previous state:
>
> ...the previous state bein
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Josip Rodin wrote:
> It's unlikely that our web pages have much content for which there
> isn't prior art, or simply common knowledge.
Prior art isn't an issue, since it's not patented.
In any event, to resolve this issue completely all that we need is 1)
a GPG signed email f
Hi,
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 16:39, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >> > > I thought aptitude was the recommended frontend.
> >> > In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are
> >> > no complex dependencies to be resolved, you only upgrade existing
> >> > packages and there shoul
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Pe?a
> wrote:
> > - Debian-legal says that the website license (OPL) not DFSG-free (see
> > http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20040312.160816.9f618d1f.html)
>
> This is the same
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña:
Even though the timeframe for the removal is rather large (6 months) it
would be a nice addition to that service to have the actions e-mail to
translators' lists before they are taken (and content is removed from the
website).
Currently, the only mail produced
The procedure is described at [1]; it basically boils down to: "Please
send us a bug report against the wnpp package".
Links:
1: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
Thanks Alexander for your quick reply
Regards
Sébastien CELLES
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 388141 www.debian.org SPI copyright claim not legally valid until all
> contributors are contacted for relicensing
Bug#388141: www.debian.org copyright statements are false & website is illegal
to publish until all contributors are contacted f
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> > What license problem? Everything is licensed to SPI, always has been.
>
> I'm suprised you ask this. Have you read 238245?
Obviously not :)
> Several problems:
>
> - The website claims the Copyright belongs to S
1.
Co. AUSA, Almacenes Universales SA, Cuba
2.
Commercial
3. /http://www.ausa.co.cu/
4. The company counts on a network of 30 servers between its
dependencies, 5 of them facing Internet. We used the Debian
distribution. from July 2006. with the services of mail (pos
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> This means no content from the site can (legally) be copied over to, for
> example, a GPL-licensed document (such as those produced by the DDP) or a
> GPL program.
For reference, this is #192748 (which was clon
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:25:31PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> >> - Our procedure for out-of-date pages is this, the log of removed
> >>pages is here.
> >
> > That would be nice, actually, an automatic mechanism that would mail the
> > l10n mailings everytime a batch of
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:08:25PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I'm unsure if we should start contacting contributors and fix the long
> > standing license problem of the website.
>
> What license problem? Everything is licensed to SPI, always has been.
I'm suprised you ask this. Have you read 2
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-28 21:49]:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:38:45PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> > > I thought aptitude was the recommended frontend.
>> >
>> > In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are no
>> > complex dependencies to be resolv
Hi!
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070530 15:32]:
> I'm looking for Xcas/Giac package in Debian
[..]
> I see the following page
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
> but I don't see how to ask for a new package
The procedure is described at [1]; it basically boils down to: "Please
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:20:40PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
>
> About a redesign
>
>
> I think that should be done, from time to time, using
> proper CSS, to show people that the Web Team is alive and working.
> I'm not saying to
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:00:38PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> The current system was implemented by Josip recently, and is a big
> improvement over the previous state:
...the previous state being that a vendor mails assorted bits of information
to a mail address, and then a human editor *mus
Hello,
I'm looking for Xcas/Giac package in Debian
http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/giac.html
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xcas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xcas
I see the following page
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
but I don't see how to ask for a new package
Regards
--
Hello,
with my "CD vendor list editor" hat on:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:25:31PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> >> =
> >> About "Who's using Debian" and CD Vendors
> >> =
> >>
> >>It would be p
22 matches
Mail list logo
