Bug#971623: review and simplify the /devel/wnpp section

2020-10-03 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Hello pabs,

Am 04.10.20 um 04:13 schrieb Paul Wise:
> wnpp.debian.net is an unofficial service that could go away at any
> moment if the Debian member sponsoring the domain leaves Debian or the
> contributor providing the service decides to shut it down.

yes you are right of course, that's no question.

> I think it would be better to not rely on it for things that we don't
> need to rely on it for and rely on it for things that aren't
> implemented anywhere else.
For me the question is "Need we this at all and in what way?"

Thomas (Lange) and myself have spoken and discussed a lot about the
structure of www.d.o and the first realization we came to was that the
website has a really complicated and bloated structure that is hindering
us in every small corner to make a visible progress in modernize and
update the content. And if "we" (means the rather long time members) do
it all on our own we also wont ever find new contributors for that
because it's to complicated and to expensive to dig in.

The solution for every big problem is to split of the big problem into
smaller problems. Cutting out the currently implemented wnpp part would
be one of the rather smaller problems on the road.

We can and should discuss how we can do this.

-- 
Regards
Carsten Schoenert



Bug#971623: review and simplify the /devel/wnpp section

2020-10-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 9:45 AM Laura Arjona Reina wrote:

> Having a look at both the resulting listings that we provide in
> www.debian.org/devel/wnpp, and the ones provided in wnpp.debian.net, I
> think maybe we could review our old approach and remove most of the
> listings we were providing, and link to wnpp.debian.net instead.

wnpp.debian.net is an unofficial service that could go away at any
moment if the Debian member sponsoring the domain leaves Debian or the
contributor providing the service decides to shut it down. I think it
would be better to not rely on it for things that we don't need to
rely on it for and rely on it for things that aren't implemented
anywhere else.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



Bug#971623: review and simplify the /devel/wnpp section

2020-10-03 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
Package: www.debian.org
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertag: scripts
Severity: normal

Hi, we received the proposal to add listing of orphaned packages by
popularity in this merge request:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/merge_requests/553

I find the idea valuable, but the approach (linking to wnpp.debian.net)
is very different from what we already have in /devel/wnpp section (we
build some lists ourselves with the wnpp.pl script [1], using the data
gathered by the 1ftpfiles script from the cron repo [2].

[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/blob/master/english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl
[2]
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/blob/master/parts/1ftpfiles

Having a look at both the resulting listings that we provide in
www.debian.org/devel/wnpp, and the ones provided in wnpp.debian.net, I
think maybe we could review our old approach and remove most of the
listings we were providing, and link to wnpp.debian.net instead.

This of course would require changes in the wml files in /devel/wnpp
section, the Makefiles, and the scripts in the cron repo.

What do you think?
Kind regards,
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona