Package: wiki.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #980249
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
Same for me and any submissions to
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/de/2023/DebianReunionHamburg#preview
(both Save Changes and Cancel) just time out. Just, for me, it’s more of
a 0-out-of-10-times thing.
This is
raspi-firmware | 1.20220830+ds-1 | unstable/non-free-firmware | source,
all
vs.
https://packages.debian.org/sid/raspi-firmware
bye,
//mirabilos
--
15:41⎜ Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
tags 1020464 - unreproducible
thanks
Paul Wise dixit:
>Perhaps your browser or an extension is adding the cookie?
It’s lynx, so… no ☻
>Searching for the name indicates this is a GitLab/salsa cookie,
>but I would expect that would set the cookie on salsa.d.o not d.o.
>
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
Why does the website set this cookie, or a cookie at all?
These are, preferences or logins aside, normally a sign of
bad behaviour like user tracking, and I’d say frowned upon
in the project.
Hi,
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#tag does not list 'ftbfs'
while https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags does. Please sync
the two lists ;-)
Just noticed the new 'ftbfs' tag in a reportbug-generated bug, I’ll
put that into the manual ones now…
bye,
//mirabilos
--
tarent
Hello,
> packages.qa.d.o is deprecated and will eventually go away once
> tracker.d.o supports everything packages.qa.d.o does, so I don't think
that is very ouch. It looks completely different, and its UI
makes it hard to find things, I am very happy with p.qa.d.o.
To whom do I have to talk to
Hi,
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/libidn2 (for example)
has a number of links on the right, e.g. “Bug Reports”,
“Developer Information”, etc.
There used to be a link to packages.qa.d.o/libi/libidn2.html
there, which seems to have vanished.
Please re-add that link.
Thanks,
//mirabilos
Dominik George dixit:
The link to the pbuilder tarball by Thorsten Glaser was invalidated by
tg's resignation and subsequent removal of people.debian.org content.
Please just link to the Wiki instead. I updated some of the links on
M68k/Installing today when we made new images at the Debian/m68k
I’d expect 46-1 in sid, jessie to show up, etc.
I get consistently wrong results for both IPs,
2001:8D8:880:901:0:0:1A1:4 and 2001:41C8:1000:21:0:0:21:3.
$ lynx -dump packages.debian.org/mksh
[1]Debian
[2]skip the navigation
[3]Packages
* [4]About Debian
* [5]Getting Debian
Simon Paillard dixit:
Since installation of new packages-master.d.o, there as been no database
updated, not sure why yet (it seems an old lockfile was lying around).
Ah, okay. I had been wondering.
Regarding jessie, it's a different thing as releases names are harcoded.
The pdo code has just
In Lynx:
←←←→→→Debian -- Details of package isoquery in sid (p4 of 6)
dep: [66]libxml++2.6-2 (= 2.24.0) [not all]
C++ interface to the GNOME XML library (libxml2)
What is a [!all] dependency? ;-)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
I noticed a regression (actually two) in the list of binary pak-
kages per architecture, for example on this page:
‣ http://packages.debian.org/sid/kdelibs5-dev
It looks like this in Lynx (good):
Francesca Ciceri dixit:
I've dropped the 'current issues' part and not mentioned the
not-yet-created wiki.d.o/M68k/Status page: we could add this info when the
page will be created.
I’ve created it now and filled it with content; one of the issues has
already been fixed by Andreas Schwab (thanks
/a, but
Working on it, new eglibc is compiling, thanks _again_
to Andreas Schwab. Maybe it helps, maybe it isn’t.
I think we shouldn’t hardcode such things on the main
website but refer to something like the as-of-yet not
created https://wiki.debian.org/M68k/Status instead.
+p
+Thorsten Glaser has
Francesca Ciceri dixit:
Debian currently runs on the 68020, 68030, 68040 and 68060 processors.
Current Debian releases support Atari, Amiga, VMEbus, and some
Macintosh systems.
I’d keep the “Debian currently runs” but state that this is not in a
released version and hasn’t
Francesca Ciceri dixit:
w.r.t. the recent effort to revive the port and the progress about it).
I’ll write on that later. Just FYI that I saw it and will RSVP.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
ch you introduced a merge commit│mika % g rebase -i HEAD^^
mika sorry, no idea and rebasing just fscked
16 matches
Mail list logo
