Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-26 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 05:39:13PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Adam Di Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The current state is that translations are relying on the existance of www.es.debian.org and www.br.debian.org, both of which are not very reliable. In fact, neither is currently

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-26 Thread Adam Di Carlo
James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'll try pointing the urlchecker at http://www.debian.org/releases/potato and see what happens. Oh, I don't have the documentation up there yet. I was asking more about the slink stuff. You were saying you'd go thru that ... It would help me not to

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-26 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 11:34:06PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'll try pointing the urlchecker at http://www.debian.org/releases/potato and see what happens. Oh, I don't have the documentation up there yet. It's probably a good idea for us to

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-25 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Adam Di Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The current state is that translations are relying on the existance of www.es.debian.org and www.br.debian.org, both of which are not very reliable. In fact, neither is currently accessable. This isn't very robust. Well, lets just have it all point,

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-24 Thread James A. Treacy
Where is the install doc source for slink? I'd like to get rid of as many of the broken links in it as possible. If the install docs aren't going to be updated ever again, I could simply make the changes in the current .html. In looking through the doc source for potato, I notice that

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Where is the install doc source for slink? I'd like to get rid of as many of the broken links in it as possible. If the install docs aren't going to be updated ever again, I could simply make the changes in the current .html. Don't do that. Oh, Ick. Use the included CVS instructions. Use the

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-24 Thread James A. Treacy
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 02:53:05PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Uh... As for listing the official mirrors, I'd rather not. It would be nice if there was a CGI where I could point to a special URL and it would list all possible mirrors and give the user a cookie or something so they use that

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
The current state is that translations are relying on the existance of www.es.debian.org and www.br.debian.org, both of which are not very reliable. In fact, neither is currently accessable. This isn't very robust. Well, lets just have it all point, for web pages, to www.debian.org. Go ahead and

Re: Please rebuild *.ja.txt under releases/slink on web (Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions? )

2000-03-23 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi, thank you for your reply ! In [EMAIL PROTECTED], at Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:00:31 -0500, with Re: Please rebuild *.ja.txt under releases/slink on web (Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions? ) , Adam Di Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: adam Adam, can you rebuild *.ja.txt under

Please rebuild *.ja.txt under releases/slink on web (Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions? )

2000-03-22 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Adam, can you rebuild *.ja.txt under releases/slink on www.debian.org with the recent potato version of debiandoc-sgml ? # if I can do, I will happily do it. From Debian Bug report logs - #60354 (http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/60/60354.html) | Subject: Re: Bug#60354: www.debian.org:

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-21 Thread Adam Di Carlo
James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On a related note, is boot-floppies responsible for the files in releases/{slink,potato}/? There are a number of problems with links there and I need to know who to forward problems/bugs to (and there are currently a LOT of broken links). If I had

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-21 Thread James A. Treacy
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 10:48:15PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: I haven't had a chance to populate the potato data yet. So any broken links there are purely WML problems. I'm going to generate a new broken url list as soon as todays mirror update is done. Oh, and for slink, I copies the

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-21 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 10:48:15PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: On a related note, is boot-floppies responsible for the files in releases/{slink,potato}/? There are a number of problems with links there and I need to know who to forward problems/bugs to (and there are currently a LOT of

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-21 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ah. Finnally someone said something concrete about this. :) So all the boot-floppies does to the web pages is generate the installation manual, dselect tutorial, and the release notes, and put it in the right place. Right? Right. .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-20 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 03:29:05AM -0800, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: Debian == Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Debian Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 58638 boot-floppies Debian Bug#58638: The documentation in disks-i386 is not available

Re: `boot-floppies' documentation naming conventions?

2000-03-20 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 03:48:31PM -0800, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: Adam == Adam Di Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yesterday was the first time I read anything about that... What I learned is that with Apache Options Multiviews, a file named like name.html.en will be found