Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2005 17:57:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Addressed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 23:35:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 15:35:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from silicon.club.cc.cmu.edu [128.2.4.170]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cos17-0001sX-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:35:09 -0800
Received: (qmail 14465 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2005 23:35:07 -0000
Received: from tellurium.club.cc.cmu.edu (HELO laptop) (128.2.4.134)
by silicon.club.cc.cmu.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2005 23:35:07 -0000
Received: by laptop (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 69F331ADCD; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:42:29 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Sammon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: packages.debian.org recently got uglier in non-CSS
browsers
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.60
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:42:28 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
This change has happened in the past week or two, as far as I can tell; I
look at packages.debian.org at least once or twice a week.
When I look at a package info page with my non-CSS browser, where it used to
display a graphical bullet color-coded to the type of dependency, now it
just displays [dep] or [sug] or [rec]. This makes it take me longer to scan
the page to determine which dependencies I am interested in.
You can see this if you use the "dillo" browser.
Has a decision been made to only support CSS browsers?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 290187-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 15:57:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 19 08:57:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYnP1-0000sF-00; Thu, 19 May 2005 08:57:39 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DYnOz-0000DH-E0
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 May 2005 17:57:37 +0200
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:57:37 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Addressed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
I think this bug is sufficiently addressed by now.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
