Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:18:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302739: =?iso-8859-1?Q?www=2Edebia?= 
=?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2Eorg=3A_doc=2Freference_=A7?= 2.1.3 says sarge=stable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 18:05:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 10:05:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DHmzm-0005WU-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:05:18 -0800
Received: from 213-84-114-29.adsl.xs4all.nl (tofu.mamane.lu) [213.84.114.29] 
        by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DHmzk-0005sk-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:05:17 -0700
Received: from master by tofu.mamane.lu with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DHmwg-0005ti-Ad
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:02:06 +0200
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:02:06 +0200
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: =?iso-8859-15?Q?doc=2Frefe?=
        =?iso-8859-15?Q?rence_=A7?= 2.1.3 says sarge=stable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux
X-Request-PGP: http://www.mamane.lu/openpgp/dh4096.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-system.en.html, section
2.1.3 says that sarge is the current stable, which is rather confusing
for people not up to date with Debian news.

-- 
Lionel

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302739-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 19:18:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 12:18:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DIAcI-0001vt-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:18:38 -0700
Received: from [217.2.130.32] (helo=localhost)
        by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
        (WEB.DE 4.104 #268)
        id 1DIAbn-0001j0-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:18:07 +0200
Received: from jens by localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DIAbz-0001rN-RG; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:18:19 +0200
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:18:19 +0200
From: Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#302739: =?iso-8859-1?Q?www=2Edebia?=
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2Eorg=3A_doc=2Freference_=A7?= 2.1.3 says sarge=stable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 08:02:06PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-system.en.html, section
> 2.1.3 says that sarge is the current stable, which is rather confusing
> for people not up to date with Debian news.

Thanks for this report.

I changed the DDP version to use Woody for stable, but please note that
this will be overridden with the next synchronisation from SourceForce
CVS (project name: qref). This is because we prepare a new version
and deb packages for Sarge and we need of course to mention Sarge as the
stable release so that it can migrate to Sarge.

Jens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to