On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Rafael Ruiz wrote:
> So, Nowdays there are a Linux distribution for Alpha working?
> Is NetBSD and OpenBSD our only choice?
Gentoo is the only actively maintained distribution.
> Linux kernel is good for Alpha, specially 2.4.
You should try 2.6.
Matt
--
To U
So, Nowdays there are a Linux distribution for Alpha working?
Is NetBSD and OpenBSD our only choice?
Linux kernel is good for Alpha, specially 2.4.
Best,
Rafa
2009/12/7 Steve Langasek
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:28:49AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:39:53PM +1030,
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:28:49AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:39:53PM +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > Package: www.debian.org
> > Severity: minor
> > The "Ports" section of [1] lists half a dozen porters for the Alpha
> > architecture. Sadly, this is incorrect, as there is
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:13:05AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > the Alpha port has actually already been dropped:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg0.html
>
> thats exactly why I wrote what I wrote
That is wh
On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
> the Alpha port has actually already been dropped:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg0.html
thats exactly why I wrote what I wrote
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Le Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 06:19:30PM +0100, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 30. November 2009, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Should we remove Alpha section from this list? Someone who knows this for
> > sure, please respond.
>
> I would rather suggest to keep the section and mention (there) t
Hi,
On Montag, 30. November 2009, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Should we remove Alpha section from this list? Someone who knows this for
> sure, please respond.
I would rather suggest to keep the section and mention (there) that there are
no alpha porters and thus the port is becoming unmaintained and i
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:39:53PM +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: minor
>
> The "Ports" section of [1] lists half a dozen porters for the Alpha
> architecture. Sadly, this is incorrect, as there is (afaik) no active
> Alpha porters in Debian.
> thanks,
> kk
>
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
The "Ports" section of [1] lists half a dozen porters for the Alpha
architecture. Sadly, this is incorrect, as there is (afaik) no active
Alpha porters in Debian.
thanks,
kk
[1] http://www.debian.org/intro/organization#distribution
-- System Information:
9 matches
Mail list logo
