Debian BTS robots.txt

2014-07-31 Thread Riley Baird
Hi -www! I have noticed that the robots.txt of bugs.debian.org does not allow the Wayback Machine to archive Debian's bugs. It already allows 4 different search engines to view the pages, so I'd imagine that there would be no objection to adding the Wayback Machine. Yours sincere

Re: Debian BTS robots.txt

2014-07-31 Thread Riley Baird
On 31/07/14 17:38, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Riley Baird wrote: > >> I have noticed that the robots.txt of bugs.debian.org does not allow the >> Wayback Machine to archive Debian's bugs. > > Please resend your mail to the maintainers of th

Bug#388141: Relicensing of Debian www pages

2015-01-22 Thread Riley Baird
Hi Bradley, A couple of years ago, you offered to assist Debian in the relicensing of its www pages. Has there been any progress on this? Yours thankfully, Riley Baird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Bug#388141: Relicensing of Debian www pages

2015-01-23 Thread Riley Baird
On 24/01/15 00:44, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > Riley Baird wrote at 17:16 (EST) on Thursday: >> A couple of years ago, you offered to assist Debian in the relicensing >> of its www pages. Has there been any progress on this? > > I remain willing to help, but I cannot take the le

Relicensing of debian-www pages

2015-02-05 Thread Riley Baird
If not, would anyone be interested in making it? Yours sincerely, Riley Baird [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=388141#356 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm

Re: No se han podido extraer las fuentes de instalacion

2015-02-09 Thread Riley Baird
On 09/02/15 23:26, emilio wrote: > W: Duplicate sources.list entry ftp://ftp.es.debian.org/debian/ > testing/main amd64 Packages > (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.es.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_binary-amd64_Packages) > > W: Duplicate sources.list entry ftp://ftp.es.debian.org/debian/ > testing/co

Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

2015-02-12 Thread Riley Baird
eived. In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before the jessie release. Because of this, would it be okay to mark it as "jessie-ignore"? Thanks, Riley Baird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

2015-02-13 Thread Riley Baird
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:40:53 + "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > On 2015-02-12 19:59, Riley Baird wrote: > > In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is > > definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before > > the jessie rel

Fw: Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

2015-02-13 Thread Riley Baird
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:47:53 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Riley Baird wrote: > > In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is > > definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before > > the jessie release. Because

Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

2015-02-13 Thread Riley Baird
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:16:39 +0100 Tomas Pospisek wrote: > Am 12.02.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Riley Baird: > > > Bug #388141 [RC] refers to the relicensing of the debian www pages. > > After contacting debian-www, it seems that there isn't much interest in > > fi

Re: Package count on Debian homepage

2015-02-22 Thread Riley Baird
> It think that statements on the homepage and on the "why Debian?" pages > like "Debian comes with over 37500 different pieces of software." are a > bit misleading since newcomers will most likely interpret this as the > number of software projects that are packaged within Debian. Counting > the b