Debian BTS robots.txt

2014-07-31 Thread Riley Baird
Hi -www! I have noticed that the robots.txt of bugs.debian.org does not allow the Wayback Machine to archive Debian's bugs. It already allows 4 different search engines to view the pages, so I'd imagine that there would be no objection to adding the Wayback Machine. Yours sincerely, Riley

Re: Debian BTS robots.txt

2014-07-31 Thread Riley Baird
On 31/07/14 17:38, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Riley Baird wrote: I have noticed that the robots.txt of bugs.debian.org does not allow the Wayback Machine to archive Debian's bugs. Please resend your mail to the maintainers of the Debian BTS. Debian BTS

Bug#388141: Relicensing of Debian www pages

2015-01-23 Thread Riley Baird
On 24/01/15 00:44, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: Riley Baird wrote at 17:16 (EST) on Thursday: A couple of years ago, you offered to assist Debian in the relicensing of its www pages. Has there been any progress on this? I remain willing to help, but I cannot take the lead on this issue

Relicensing of debian-www pages

2015-02-05 Thread Riley Baird
in making it? Yours sincerely, Riley Baird [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=388141#356 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org

Bug#388141: Relicensing of Debian www pages

2015-01-22 Thread Riley Baird
Hi Bradley, A couple of years ago, you offered to assist Debian in the relicensing of its www pages. Has there been any progress on this? Yours thankfully, Riley Baird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

2015-02-12 Thread Riley Baird
. In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before the jessie release. Because of this, would it be okay to mark it as jessie-ignore? Thanks, Riley Baird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ

Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

2015-02-13 Thread Riley Baird
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:16:39 +0100 Tomas Pospisek t...@sourcepole.ch wrote: Am 12.02.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Riley Baird: Bug #388141 [RC] refers to the relicensing of the debian www pages. After contacting debian-www, it seems that there isn't much interest in fixing it. I interpret

Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

2015-02-13 Thread Riley Baird
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:40:53 + Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On 2015-02-12 19:59, Riley Baird wrote: In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before the jessie release. Because

Fw: Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

2015-02-13 Thread Riley Baird
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:47:53 -0800 Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Riley Baird wrote: In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before the jessie release. Because

Re: Package count on Debian homepage

2015-02-22 Thread Riley Baird
It think that statements on the homepage and on the why Debian? pages like Debian comes with over 37500 different pieces of software. are a bit misleading since newcomers will most likely interpret this as the number of software projects that are packaged within Debian. Counting the