Hello, Debian X Strike Force.
I've a question about XFree86 4.3.0. I want to build it for Testing
distribution, but it's sources build-depends on cpp-3.2, and
conflicts with gcc-3.3 ( 1:3.3.2-0pre1). But I've gcc and cpp
v.3.3. Is there any way to build this on my machine, or
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
+ Fix groff bug to get it building on m68k.
+NOTE: This may be machine-specific horkage on one box. If it turns out
+that's the case, let bug #197076 know.
dburrows reckons he can't reproduce it on his '060, nor on crest (an '040). Odd.
---
This e-mail is generated by the ss1.kyrnet.kg mail server to warn you that the e-mail
sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED],
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 195606 + patch
Bug#195606: xfree86v3: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Invalid preprocessor pasting
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 117225 xbase-clients
Bug#117225: xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGV while processing Speedo font directory
Bug reassigned from package `xbase-clients' to `xbase-clients'.
retitle 117225 xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGVs on Speedo fonts
Bug#117225:
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#193759: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#166550: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#209181: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.2.1-11
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/startx.1x.gz
There is no mention of how to stop X on the startx man page, and of
course there is no stopx man page.
One needs to know the proper way to stop just the X stuff started by
startx, but without going
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:38 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#210980: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#192138: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
Well, I see from the debconf data in your initial report that your mouse
is in fact configured to use protocol PS/2. Did you change that in
the debconf database (e.g., by running dpkg-reconfigure) before filing
the report?
Sort of. I upgraded and
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#119297: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#191818: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#188050: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#209142: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 195606 + patch
thanks
Here's a patch which fixes the problems compiling xfree86v3 on sid.
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
---
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#152920: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#208500: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#128338: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
Dear Branden,
I tried your suggestion, but still the same result.
I attach the log file and the configuration file.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Best regards,
Frank Stoel
Dekenijstraat 21/2
3071 Erps-Kwerps
BELGIUM
e-mail. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:38 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#211780: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#208804: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:23:40 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#213676: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/startx.1x.gz: no mention of how to
stop x
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
also sprach Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.28.0323 +0200]:
Are you still experiencing this with xfree86 4.2.1-11?
Yes.
If so, what happens if you remove your XkbVariant nodeadkeys setting?
Then it actually fixes itself. Impressive.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists;
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-12
Severity: grave
Please look at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=icewmver=1.2.13-2arch=s390stamp=1065108989file=logas=raw
or
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=icewmver=1.2.13-2arch=ia64stamp=1065108710file=logas=raw
Unpacking xlibs (from
Hi,
I'm running sid with xfree86 4.2.1-11 and I look at a blank screen for the machine.
The machine is running, so I ssh into it do some checking to find out XFree86 is using
99%
of my CPU with a priority of -10.
I guess my first question is has this happened to anyone else? I scanned
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-12
Severity: grave
Unpacking xlibs (from .../xlibs_4.2.1-12_hppa.deb) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 460: debug: command not found
Says it all.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux whatone 2.4.20 #3 Thu Feb 6 17:23:04
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 213774 213776
Bug#213774: fails to install
Bug#213776: xlibs: Fails to install: debug: command not found in preinst
Merged 213774 213776.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tags 213776 + patch
--
Here's the patch... NMU build in progress...
thanks,
lamont
diff -ur t/xfree86-4.2.1/debian/xlibs.preinst.in xfree86-4.2.1/debian/xlibs.preinst.in
--- t/xfree86-4.2.1/debian/xlibs.preinst.in 2003-10-02 11:01:06.0 -0600
+++ xfree86-4.2.1/debian/xlibs.preinst.in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 213776 + patch
Bug#213776: xlibs: Fails to install: debug: command not found in preinst
There were no tags set.
Bug#213774: fails to install
Tags added: patch
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 213676 + upstream
Bug#213676: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/startx.1x.gz: no mention of how to stop x
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:57:25PM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
I upgraded and edited the file by hand adding in xfstt. Then I
rebooted, and discovered the mouse was wonky. So I ran
dpkg-reconfigure to fix the mouse. But debconf wouldn't write out the
new config file, because it detected
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 213676
Bug#213676: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/startx.1x.gz: no mention of how to stop x
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 117225 xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGVs on Speedo fonts
Bug#117225: xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGVs on Speedo fonts
Changed Bug title.
retitle 143476 xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGVs on Speedo fonts
Bug#143476: xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGVs on
reopen 213676
thanks
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:34:20AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Press Ctrl-Alt-Backspace, or quit every running app. You don't run X forev=
er,
but by the same token, there's no 'stopx' counterpart to 'startx'.
Closing this spurious bug - Dan, please start
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:39:55PM +0200, Frank Stoel wrote:
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
Dear Branden,
I tried your suggestion, but still the same result.
I attach the log file and the configuration file.
[...]
If you're not using the kernel's framebuffer console feature, this
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:37:16PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.28.0323 +0200]:
Are you still experiencing this with xfree86 4.2.1-11?
Yes.
If so, what happens if you remove your XkbVariant nodeadkeys setting?
Then it actually
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't see any evidence that dexconf tried to set your
mouse protocol to NetScrollPS/2.
In fact, I can't find any evidence, even in your original report, that
either mouse device was ever described as using the NetScrollPS/2
tag 213774 + fixed
tag 213776 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:07:11 -0600
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibmesa3-gl
retitle 184337 xserver-xfree86: ctrl:nocaps overridden by us/nodeadkeys/pc104
thanks
also sprach Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.03.0126 +0200]:
So, for some reason the nodeadkeys variant in the us layout with the
pc104 model kills off the ctrl:nocaps option.
Sounds reasonable. The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 213774 + fixed
Bug#213774: fails to install
Tags were: patch
Bug#213776: xlibs: Fails to install: debug: command not found in preinst
Tags added: fixed
tag 213776 + fixed
Bug#213776: xlibs: Fails to install: debug: command not found in preinst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 184337 xserver-xfree86: ctrl:nocaps overridden by us/nodeadkeys/pc104
Bug#184337: xlibs: [xkb] XkbOptions ctrl:nocaps not working
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 00:13, Branden Robinson wrote:
It looks to me like you still have the UseFBDev option set.
The i810 driver doesn't support Option UseFBDev at all, so it's
ignored.
--
Earthling Michel Dnzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:18:56AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
S == Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
S Press Ctrl-Alt-Backspace, or quit every running app. You don't run X forever,
OK, sounds good. If you say how to start, you should say how to stop.
I can see where you're coming
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-11
After upgrading from xfree86 4.2.1-6 to xfree86 4.2.1-11 (during an
apt-get upgrade), I have encountered font problems with various X
packages. For example, running xcalc from a terminal results in the
following error message:
Warning: Cannot convert string
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 04:45:00PM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't see any evidence that dexconf tried to set your
mouse protocol to NetScrollPS/2.
In fact, I can't find any evidence, even in your original report, that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 184337 xlibs-data
Bug#184337: xserver-xfree86: ctrl:nocaps overridden by us/nodeadkeys/pc104
Bug reassigned from package `xlibs' to `xlibs-data'.
retitle 184337 xlibs-data: [xkb] option ctrl:nocaps does not work with
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 03:55:12AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 00:13, Branden Robinson wrote:
It looks to me like you still have the UseFBDev option set.
The i810 driver doesn't support Option UseFBDev at all, so it's
ignored.
In that case, I'm stumped.
--
G.
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:31:45AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
You're a brave man, LaMont. :)
It's worse than that - xfree86 build-depends xlibs, so it's still broken
for autobuilding until someone removes the bogus link manually, or uses
-11 to do the build. :-(
And I chatted with Branden
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:22:04PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
I have attempted to contact all the authors of the Synaptics XFree86 event
driver. Here are the results, so far.
How's this effort going? I still have synaptics stuff rotting in p/d/synaptics.
--
Daniel Stone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:07:11 -0600
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibmesa3-gl xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev xbase-clients twm
xlibmesa3-dbg xfonts-scalable xfonts-75dpi libdps1-dbg xmh libxaw6-dbg xfwp xlibs
xlibosmesa3-dbg
I haven't noticed any particularly similar reports, so I thought I would
check here.
I'm running Garnome 0.27.1 on debian sid+experimental. Everything was
hunky-dory until I upgraded from 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - 4.3.0-0pre1v3. At this
point, gnome-session consistently hung on the Gnome2.4 splash screen.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:17:21AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:13:33 -0500
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can everyone else please attempt a build
and if the build is
successful, upload the packages to experimental?
It builds fine (ibook 800
Hello, Debian X Strike Force.
I've a question about XFree86 4.3.0. I want to build it for Testing
distribution, but it's sources build-depends on cpp-3.2, and
conflicts with gcc-3.3 ( 1:3.3.2-0pre1). But I've gcc and cpp
v.3.3. Is there any way to build this on my machine, or
Hi folks,
I don't know how, but the last ugrade from 4.3.0-0pre1v1 to 4.3.0-0pre1v3
wiped out the X config file on my office PC completely. I saw some debconf
menus asking me for my preferred screensize, refresh rate, and whether I've
got a TFT. The next startup of X failed cause there was no
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
+ Fix groff bug to get it building on m68k.
+NOTE: This may be machine-specific horkage on one box. If it turns out
+that's the case, let bug #197076 know.
dburrows reckons he can't reproduce it on his '060, nor on crest (an '040).
---
This e-mail is generated by the ss1.kyrnet.kg mail server to warn you that the
e-mail
sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 195606 + patch
Bug#195606: xfree86v3: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Invalid preprocessor pasting
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 117225 xbase-clients
Bug#117225: xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGV while processing Speedo font
directory
Bug reassigned from package `xbase-clients' to `xbase-clients'.
retitle 117225 xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGVs on Speedo fonts
Bug#117225:
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#189298: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#193759: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#166550: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#209181: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.2.1-11
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/startx.1x.gz
There is no mention of how to stop X on the startx man page, and of
course there is no stopx man page.
One needs to know the proper way to stop just the X stuff started by
startx, but without going
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:38 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#210980: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#192138: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
Well, I see from the debconf data in your initial report that your mouse
is in fact configured to use protocol PS/2. Did you change that in
the debconf database (e.g., by running dpkg-reconfigure) before filing
the report?
Sort of. I upgraded and
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#191818: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#209142: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 195606 + patch
thanks
Here's a patch which fixes the problems compiling xfree86v3 on sid.
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
---
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#185605: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#152920: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#182861: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#208500: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#128338: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
Dear Branden,
I tried your suggestion, but still the same result.
I attach the log file and the configuration file.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Best regards,
Frank Stoel
Dekenijstraat 21/2
3071 Erps-Kwerps
BELGIUM
e-mail. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:38 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#211780: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:03:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#208804: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:23:40 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#213676: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/startx.1x.gz: no mention of
how to stop x
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
also sprach Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.28.0323 +0200]:
Are you still experiencing this with xfree86 4.2.1-11?
Yes.
If so, what happens if you remove your XkbVariant nodeadkeys setting?
Then it actually fixes itself. Impressive.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists;
Hi,
I'm running sid with xfree86 4.2.1-11 and I look at a blank screen for the
machine.
The machine is running, so I ssh into it do some checking to find out XFree86
is using 99%
of my CPU with a priority of -10.
I guess my first question is has this happened to anyone else? I scanned
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-12
Severity: grave
Unpacking xlibs (from .../xlibs_4.2.1-12_hppa.deb) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 460: debug: command not found
Says it all.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux whatone 2.4.20 #3 Thu Feb 6 17:23:04
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 213774 213776
Bug#213774: fails to install
Bug#213776: xlibs: Fails to install: debug: command not found in preinst
Merged 213774 213776.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tags 213776 + patch
--
Here's the patch... NMU build in progress...
thanks,
lamont
diff -ur t/xfree86-4.2.1/debian/xlibs.preinst.in
xfree86-4.2.1/debian/xlibs.preinst.in
--- t/xfree86-4.2.1/debian/xlibs.preinst.in 2003-10-02 11:01:06.0
-0600
+++
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 213776 + patch
Bug#213776: xlibs: Fails to install: debug: command not found in preinst
There were no tags set.
Bug#213774: fails to install
Tags added: patch
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 213676 + upstream
Bug#213676: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/startx.1x.gz: no mention of how to stop x
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 213676
Bug#213676: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/startx.1x.gz: no mention of how to stop x
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 117225 xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGVs on Speedo fonts
Bug#117225: xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGVs on Speedo fonts
Changed Bug title.
retitle 143476 xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGVs on Speedo fonts
Bug#143476: xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGVs on
reopen 213676
thanks
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:34:20AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Press Ctrl-Alt-Backspace, or quit every running app. You don't run X forev=
er,
but by the same token, there's no 'stopx' counterpart to 'startx'.
Closing this spurious bug - Dan, please start
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:39:55PM +0200, Frank Stoel wrote:
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
Dear Branden,
I tried your suggestion, but still the same result.
I attach the log file and the configuration file.
[...]
If you're not using the kernel's framebuffer console feature, this
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:37:16PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.28.0323 +0200]:
Are you still experiencing this with xfree86 4.2.1-11?
Yes.
If so, what happens if you remove your XkbVariant nodeadkeys setting?
Then it actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:07:11 -0600
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibmesa3-gl xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev xbase-clients
twm xlibmesa3-dbg xfonts-scalable xfonts-75dpi libdps1-dbg xmh libxaw6-dbg xfwp
xlibs xlibosmesa3-dbg
tag 213774 + fixed
tag 213776 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:07:11 -0600
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibmesa3-gl
retitle 184337 xserver-xfree86: ctrl:nocaps overridden by us/nodeadkeys/pc104
thanks
also sprach Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.03.0126 +0200]:
So, for some reason the nodeadkeys variant in the us layout with the
pc104 model kills off the ctrl:nocaps option.
Sounds reasonable. The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 213774 + fixed
Bug#213774: fails to install
Tags were: patch
Bug#213776: xlibs: Fails to install: debug: command not found in preinst
Tags added: fixed
tag 213776 + fixed
Bug#213776: xlibs: Fails to install: debug: command not found in preinst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 184337 xserver-xfree86: ctrl:nocaps overridden by us/nodeadkeys/pc104
Bug#184337: xlibs: [xkb] XkbOptions ctrl:nocaps not working
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:35:42PM -0400, LaMont Jones wrote:
Maintainer: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
lbxproxy - Low Bandwidth X (LBX) proxy server
[...]
You're a brave man, LaMont. :)
--
Daniel Stone
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 00:13, Branden Robinson wrote:
It looks to me like you still have the UseFBDev option set.
The i810 driver doesn't support Option UseFBDev at all, so it's
ignored.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \
S == Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
S Press Ctrl-Alt-Backspace, or quit every running app. You don't run X
forever,
OK, sounds good. If you say how to start, you should say how to stop.
S Closing this spurious bug - Dan, please start thinking before you file bugs.
OK, but have you
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
