Bug#121900: xlibs: glibc locales not listed in X's locale.alias

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:08:57PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: xlibs Version: 4.2.1-12.1 Severity: normal It looks as if many of the locales in the original list submitted for this bug are not supported by the X libraries. Can you elaborate on this statement, please? There

Re: [Fwd: Re: gdm in Gnome 2.4 shutdown even harder]

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:58:49PM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: I guess it was misdirected ... Huh? I am completely confused as to why you sent this message to debian-x. Can you provide some context, please? -- G. Branden Robinson| You could wire up a dead rat to a Debian

Re: 4.3.0: Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:38:04PM +0100, alessandro medici wrote: On my acer tm290 i don't have correct result from xf86 (and sorry for my poor english language): on boot from startx: The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports: Error: Can't find file aliases for the keycodes

Processed: Re: Bug#220032: Keys not working anymore

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 220032 xlibs-data: [xkb] ' ' key doesn't work if XkbModel is pc104 Bug#220032: Keys not working anymore Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#220032: marked as done (xlibs-data: [xkb] ' ' key doesn't work if XkbModel is pc104)

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 14 Nov 2003 01:42:27 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#220032: Keys not working anymore has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Re: xbase-clients 4.3.0-pre1v4: incorrect permissions set on /usr/X11R6/bin

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:15:43AM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote: I did a fresh install of Debian using the new debian-installer. I only installed the base packages. I then dist-upgraded to unstable. I installed xfree86 4.3.0-pre1v4 with no previous version of x installed. I also installed

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 757 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:22:26AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: Author: daniel Date: 2003-11-12 01:22:22 -0500 (Wed, 12 Nov 2003) New Revision: 757 Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibmesa-dri-dbg.install.alpha

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 758 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:58:37PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:39:33AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: xfree86 (4.3.0-0pre1v4) experimental; urgency=low * Add missing symbolic links for libXTrap. [ISHIKAWA Mutsumi] @@ -2444,7 +2448,7 @@

Re: Roll your own X Packages problem with static libraries

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:00:51AM +0100, Tim Krieglstein wrote: I am just tring to get some CVS-Head, which i injected into the experimental XFree Packages debianized. I managed to compile and install, but when i make an debian/rules binary-arch. I get the following message: dh_install

Re: i830 problems on XFree 4.3

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:44:21PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a few problems running 4.3.0-0pre1v4 on my notebook. I have i830MG chipset with integrated video. My configuration is as follows: kernel: version: 2.6.0-test7 DRM compiled into kernel (CONFIG_DRM=y)

how to selectively track experimental

2003-11-14 Thread Louis-David Mitterrand
I track unstable but still want to upgrade my experimental packages. The following /etc/apt/preferences file does exactly that: Package: * Pin: release a=experimental Pin-Priority: 499 Installed experimental packages like xfree-4.3 will be upgraded from the highest version number, be it from

Processed: Re: Bug#220256: s3virge: mouse pointer frozen

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 220256 xserver-xfree86: [s3virge] cursor does not move on ViRGE/MX rev 6 Bug#220256: s3virge: mouse pointer frozen Changed Bug title. tag 220256 + moreinfo upstream Bug#220256: xserver-xfree86: [s3virge] cursor does not move on ViRGE/MX rev

Processed: Re: Processed: your mail

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 202923 wishlist Bug#202923: xserver-xfree86: want timestamps in server log messages Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#220256: s3virge: mouse pointer frozen

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
retitle 220256 xserver-xfree86: [s3virge] cursor does not move on ViRGE/MX rev 6 tag 220256 + moreinfo upstream thanks On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:34:13PM -0500, Daniel Calvelo Aros wrote: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-13 Severity: important Tags: sid Launching X, the mouse

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN property change: propchange - rev 615 svn:log

2003-11-14 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Revision: 615 Property Name: svn:log New Property Value: Tag 4.2.1-12 release.

Bug#220469: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 758 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-11-14 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:59:08AM +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote: If you are playing around with different options or even different graphic cards and want to start from scratch with a new config file, save the pre-created one in a safe location, and move it back when you're done. Yes, of

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 758 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-11-14 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:09:16AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:58:37PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:39:33AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: xfree86 (4.3.0-0pre1v4) experimental; urgency=low * Add missing

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 757 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian

2003-11-14 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Daniel Stone wrote: Thanks for catching that; I failed to scrutinize the merge closely enough here. I didn't 'catch' it per se, fabbione just bitched at me on IRC because he couldn't get XFree86 to build. ;) of course... how else can i bitch :- Fabio -- Our

Bug#214449: same problem after upgrade to 4.3.0-0pre1v4

2003-11-14 Thread Thomas Mueller
I had the same problem in Sid so tried a upgrade to XFree 4.3.0-0pre1v4 in experimental but the problem still exists. This problem breaks xdvi too: $ xdvi main.dvi X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 45

Bug#220713: xbase-clients: preinst script truncates error string on line 311

2003-11-14 Thread Paul H
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xbase-clients: preinst script truncates error string on line 311 Package: xbase-clients Version: 4.2.1-13 Severity: normal Tags: patch This bug concerns the preinstallation script for base-clients_4.2.1-13_i386.deb. The DEBIAN/preinst script trashes the

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 757 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian

2003-11-14 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:10:12AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Daniel Stone wrote: Thanks for catching that; I failed to scrutinize the merge closely enough here. I didn't 'catch' it per se, fabbione just bitched at me on IRC because he couldn't get

Bug#187218: Net Pack

2003-11-14 Thread MS Security Services
ALERT!This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files that were infected with a virus, worm, or other type of security threat. This e-mail was sent from a Road Runner IP address. As part of our continuing initiative to stop the spread of malicious viruses, Road Runner scans

Re: Bug#218919: Call for OOo user interface font size testers

2003-11-14 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
After I've configured dpi correctly on all servers, I do get correct font sizes everywhere in OpenOffice - both with 1.1.0-2 and 1.1.0-2.3pre1 What have I done: - physically measured the visible picture dimensions for monitors, and added correct DisplaySize parameter to XF86Config-4 (Section

Bug#220448: xserver-xfree86: Some fonts simply don't show up, adobe courier for example

2003-11-14 Thread Greg Stark
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't understand why you think any of the above are X server problems; they all sound like client-side issues to me. Because a) they affect more than one client, konqueror and mozilla to be specific. and b) I don't think they started when I updated

4.3.0-0pre1v4 on s390

2003-11-14 Thread Gerhard Tonn
I have built 4.3.0-0pre1v4 on s390 and got the problem, that xmodmap.std doesn't exist on s390 for some reason. Since it is now part of xbase-clients.examples and installed by dh_installexamples, the build fails. Everything else works fine. Anybody an idea? Please cc me on reply. Regards,

Bug#214449: same problem after upgrade to 4.3.0-0pre1v4

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:31:38AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote: I had the same problem in Sid so tried a upgrade to XFree 4.3.0-0pre1v4 in experimental but the problem still exists. This problem breaks xdvi too: $ xdvi main.dvi X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out

Re: Bug#219163: ITP: synaptic-touchpad -- Synaptics TouchPad driver for XFree86

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:07:41AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:58:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: That doesn't mean it won't happen, but it should be rare enough that an ad-hoc approach will work. Right, but I'm just saying that you'd then have to have

Processed: Re: Bug#219311: xdm: Default install missing referenced config files

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 219311 minorwishlist Severity level `minorwishlist' is not known. Recognized are: critical, grave, serious, important, normal, minor, wishlist, fixed. retitle 219311 xdm: messages about missing session scripts such as Xreset should be

Processed: Re: Bug#220678: xserver-xfree86: Not obvious how to configure 1400x1050

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 220678 wishlist Bug#220678: xserver-xfree86: Not obvious how to configure 1400x1050 Severity set to `wishlist'. retitle 220678 xserver-common: cannot obviously configure 1400x1050 screen resolution Bug#220678: xserver-xfree86: Not obvious

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 769 - trunk/debian

2003-11-14 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-11-14 14:04:50 -0500 (Fri, 14 Nov 2003) New Revision: 769 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/shell-lib.sh Log: Fix corrupted error message text in check_symlinks_and_warn(). (Closes: #220713) - debian/shell-lib.sh Modified: trunk/debian/changelog

Bug#220583: marked as done (Segmentation fault when calling 'xterm -geom 0x0')

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:54:09 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#220583: Segmentation fault when calling 'xterm -geom 0x0' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#220678: xserver-xfree86: Not obvious how to configure 1400x1050

2003-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
severity 220678 wishlist retitle 220678 xserver-common: cannot obviously configure 1400x1050 screen resolution reassign 220678 xserver-common merge 220678 144040 thanks On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:09:55PM +1100, Brian May wrote: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v4 Severity: normal

Bug#214449: same problem after upgrade to 4.3.0-0pre1v4

2003-11-14 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Branden, $ xdvi main.dvi X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 45 (X_OpenFont) Value in failed request: 0x345 Serial number of failed request: 25 Current serial number in output stream:

Processed: tagging 220713

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository, revision 769; see http://deadbeast.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?root=xfree86 tag 220713 + pending Bug#220713: xbase-clients: preinst script truncates error string on line 311 Tags were: patch Tags

Bug#220814: X 4.3 FTBFS on hppa

2003-11-14 Thread Matthew Wilcox
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v4 Severity: serious Tags: experimental X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branden, I initially thought this was an hppa problem. It's not, it's a kernel-headers problem. I suspect it will also affect unstable, but I'm not sure. gcc -c -g -O2 -ansi

xfree86_4.2.1-14(unstable/sparc): FTBFS

2003-11-14 Thread James Troup
sparc-utils changelog for details). #3 (below) was in an up-to-date chroot (with working sparc32) | Automatic build of xfree86_4.2.1-14 on vore by sbuild/sparc 1.170.4 | Build started at 20031114-1051 | ** [...] | ** Using

Bug#214449: same problem after upgrade to 4.3.0-0pre1v4

2003-11-14 Thread Thomas Mueller
I've attached a stripped down version. Sorry forgot the attachement. -- MfG Thomas Mueller - http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B) main.dvi Description: TeX dvi file

Bug#220678: xserver-xfree86: Not obvious how to configure 1400x1050

2003-11-14 Thread Brian May
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:59:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: This bug has already been filed. In the future, please use reportbug to help avoid filing duplicate reports. Actually I did use reportbug, but it didn't show me the bug report because it is against xserver-common, not

Bug#121900: xlibs: glibc locales not listed in X's locale.alias

2003-11-14 Thread Steve Fosdick
On 2003.11.14 06:47, Branden Robinson wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:08:57PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks as if many of the locales in the original list submitted for this bug are not supported by the X libraries. Can you elaborate on this statement, please? I am taking the

Setting DisplaySize in dexconf-generated XF86Config ?

2003-11-14 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Some experiments show that to get best results with OpenOffice.org (and probably other packages), X server's DPI value should be set to real monitor DPI. XFree86 seems to have an excellent way to do that. In XF86Config-4, in section Monitor, one can write DisplaySize 320 240 and

Idea for smoother upgrade from pre-4.3 XFree to 4.3

2003-11-14 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. To get correctly configured russian keyboard In pre-4.3 xkb configuration, we had to write Option XkbLayout ru In 4.3, we have to write Option XkbLayout us,ru because setting it to just ru now gives only russian letters input, instead of both english and russian (which

Bug#220814: #define rate period patch broken for 2.4 kernels (was: Re: Bug#220814: X 4.3 FTBFS on hppa)

2003-11-14 Thread Daniel Stone
-utils changelog for details). #3 (below) was in an up-to-date chroot (with working sparc32) | Automatic build of xfree86_4.2.1-14 on vore by sbuild/sparc 1.170.4 | Build started at 20031114-1051

Processed: #define rate period patch broken for 2.4 kernels (was: Re: Bug#220814: X 4.3 FTBFS on hppa)

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # + sarge? tags 220814 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#220814: X 4.3 FTBFS on hppa Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental thanks mate Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Re: #define rate period patch broken for 2.4 kernels

2003-11-14 Thread James Troup
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AFAICT, the only kernel headers on there are 2.4.21-sparc, and it should Err, no. All architectures use the linux-kernel-headers package now and it's 2.6 based. Anyway, don't worry, I've tracked down the problem with the help of the glibc folks and it's

Processed: sumitter 185936

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 185936 ! Bug#185936: xlibs-pic: licq FTBFSes if it can't lay its dirty hands on a static PIC version of libXss Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]. End of message, stopping processing here.

Re: #define rate period patch broken for 2.4 kernels

2003-11-14 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:34:20AM +, James Troup wrote: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AFAICT, the only kernel headers on there are 2.4.21-sparc, and it should Err, no. All architectures use the linux-kernel-headers package now and it's 2.6 based. Anyway, don't worry, I've