-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
As you might have seen from the messages on debian-devel-changes,
4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 has been accepted into unstable.
As XSF release manager, I have no objections to the TODO list for -6 [0],
but there is one item that we consider
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
with layout pc105/fr and options altwin:left_meta_win,compose:menu mofiifers
are totally broken : Mod4 for super_l, hyper_l, and meta_l
the alt key has both alt and meta symbols (contradictions), and meta_l has
modifier mod1 AND mod4.
Reverting this patch fixes the problem for me.
However it was a bugfix (which obscured other bugs). The issue is whether
the line-drawing character set should be selected on startup. Normally
applications do this the first time line-drawing is performed. I seem to
recall (unrelated to this
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
Setting the xkbmap to dvorak fails with error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ setxkbmap dvorak
Error loading new keyboard description
though the initial setting of the keyboard at X startup is done
correctly. The relevant fragment of the
Package: x-window-system
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Running Sid.
Not sure if it is a bug (but annoying anyway :-) x-window-system's
dependencies include xdm and twm and other things that are not really
essential to running X.
--
Tom Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fotango Ltd.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 18 Jun 2004 08:02, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Hi everybody,
As you might have seen from the messages on
debian-devel-changes, 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 has been accepted into unstable.
Seen it, downloaded it and installed it. Works like
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: sid
hi,
i've copied the symbols file from one dir up (/etc/X11/xkb/symbols) to
the macintosh/ dir (/etc/X11/xkb/symbols/macintosh). this works fine for
my keyboard, which is one of those old ADB apple design keyboards,
with a CSA
Hi David,
it is always a good idea to redirect these requests to the mailing
list since other people can answer if i am not available, plus they will
be recorded and other users with the same question as your can find easily
an answer.
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, David Goodenough wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
* What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
As a user, all I care about:
* DFSG-free
* supports my hardware
* is ready whenever Debian would like to make a release, i.e. X should
not be the delaying point itself.
*
IMHO,
@ 18/06/2004 04:03 : wrote Fabio Massimo Di Nitto :
* What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
I am not sure I understand this question. I, for one, would like to
see packaged both xorg and kdrive based servers.
* Should we regard X.Org or FreeDesktop.Org as our
Thanks for your reply. I am not subscribed to the debian-x list, and
was not quite sure which was the appropriate list, but now I know.
I have embedded my answers to your questions.
David
On Friday 18 June 2004 12:04, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Hi David,
it is always a good idea to
hi everyone,
i am trying to install sarge onto a sun ultra 5 and i am encountering a
very strange X problem: startx gives me
...
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE)
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
I'm using a pc105 (int) keyboard, with default settings for the
Windows and Alt keys. according to GNOME's keyboard tool. Here's what
it put in my .xsession file:
xkbset b r rate 500 33 perkeyrepeat
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:02:50AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
* What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
Split up packages similiar to how XFree in Debian is currently.
* Should we regard X.Org or FreeDesktop.Org as our upstream source?
From what I have read
oh, and i found something else that fits into the picture: the log file
says
...
(II) LoadModule: pcidata
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) Module pcidata: vendor=The XFree86 Project
compiled for 4.3.0.1, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: XFree86 Video
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Tom Taylor wrote:
Package: x-window-system
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Running Sid.
Not sure if it is a bug (but annoying anyway :-) x-window-system's
dependencies include xdm and twm and other things that are not really
essential to running X.
Around 9 o'clock on Jun 18, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
* What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
Mostly I'd like to see reasonably small packages which are updated and
maintained separately so that we don't continue to have an over-arching 'X
version' and instead have
* Jonathan Black [Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:52:51 +0200]:
Same, here and while attempting to track down the problem, I found that
it was not limited to KDE, but the same behaviour occurred in GNOME too.
It appears to have be caused by the new 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 versions of the
XFree86 packages that
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #254923
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xfree86
/var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum does not exist.
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Feb 8
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-18 13:52:24 -0500 (Fri, 18 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1552
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Add item to -6 without checking with Fabio because:
A) it's easy to implement, and won't introduce an RC bug even if it
breaks into a million pieces
B) people are
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:02:50AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Our questions to the community are:
* What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
Working ones. With as few (upstream and debian-specific) bugs as
possible.
Case at hand: I have yet to see the first
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040618 21:55]:
I'm deliberately not choosing sides here, even though I know you're
asking for people to choose sides. IMO, however, you (the X Strike
Force) are best qualified to choose which way to go from now. I
therefore suggest you consider the above
Ruben Navarro Huedo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello friends:
do you know some repository for xfree86 4.4.0 (sparc).
I have some problems with 4.2.0 and my elite3d
Have you tried 4.3.0 from unstable?
--
ilmari
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:34:09AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
I'd also like to see the fonts moved to arch any, I got side tracked
attempting to switch from .pcf.gz to .ttf format, but there's no reason we
can't simply compile to .pcf.gz on i386 and ship them from there -- every
arch can
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:49:44PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:02:50AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Our questions to the community are:
* What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
Working ones. With as few (upstream and
Hi,
please apply the attached patch to your tree. It fixes the following
issues with the RandR extension (name of submitter in parentheses):
568. The call to xf86RandRSetMode() from f86RandRCreateScreenResources()
doesn't appear to be necessary. Removing it restores the
documented
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:52:45PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
I've attached the termcap file from the NetBSD machine.
I see - rather old (4 years). I compared that termcap to the most recent one,
saw no applicable differences.
Compiled a copy of screen with termcap and curses on a NetBSD
1.6,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 08:39:00PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:52:45PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
I've attached the termcap file from the NetBSD machine.
I see - rather old (4 years). I compared that termcap to the most recent one,
saw no applicable differences.
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-18 21:41:35 -0500 (Fri, 18 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1553
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Add item.
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===
--- trunk/debian/TODO 2004-06-18 18:52:24 UTC (rev 1552)
+++
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 03:02, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
As you might have seen from the messages on debian-devel-changes,
4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 has been accepted into unstable.
Our questions to the community are:
* What
30 matches
Mail list logo
