On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 23:23:39 +, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-02-23 23:23:38 -0500 (Thu, 23 Feb 2006)
New Revision: 1306
Modified:
branches/modular/proto/glproto-X11R7.0-1.4.3/debian/changelog
The bug seems to happen inside the dh_purge statement. Here are the last
three lines I get after modifying the postrm script to set -x:
+ read -r _db_internal_line
+ RET='20 Unsupported command removing (full line was Removing any
system startup links for /etc/init.d/xserver-xorg ...) received
Redirecting the output of update-rc.d to standard error fixes the
problem. At least for me.
Cheers,
-Hilko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
version 6.8 works OK with my configuration.
I am using Debian testing 20060215 snapshoot.
my config:
Section Files
FontPathunix/:7100# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility
Radeon 9600 M10]
Regards
Michal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: normal
I get the following message in my logs:
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so: undefined symbol:
__glXLastContext
(EE) Failed to load
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: normal
Contrary to what is said in the package description, (at least) glxgears
is not present in the package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Provide a compatibility symlink to /usr/lib/X11/fonts (their new home) at
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts. This will let external fonts work as expected.
Thanks Eugene Konev.
I thought they were moving to /usr/share/fonts/X11?
--
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+Package: xlibmesa-dri
+Section: libdevel
+Architecture: any
+Depends: libgl1-mesa-dri
This will probably be more effective if you version libgl1-mesa-dri's
conflict with xlibmesa-dri. :-)
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal
I'm using the evdev input driver to get a Hauppauge remote control to
work. All the buttons work but two of the buttons end up with the same
keycode which is not much use. Using evtest the kernel device driver is
providing the correct
Package: xdm
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal
xdm restarts at his updates, which causes killing xserver with all aps
it running, including xterm with apt-get, which installing the newer
version of xdm =). In result, not all installing packages been properly
configured, and system need
Hi,
I don't have Debian on this computer, but I'd like to note that on
Ubuntu, I only need to downgrade xserver-xorg-core to get my
dual-head/xinerama working again. It's _not_ the radeon driver that's
the problem.
Of course, the Debian bug might be a totally different problem, but I
doubt it.
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: normal
File: /usr/X11R6/bin/uxterm
No idea why uxterm dies half a second after started in about 2/3rds on
invocations on Linux 2.6.12 on Thinkpad r50e. However, on Linux
2.6.14-2-k7 it starts every time.
$ xterm -class UXTerm -title uxterm -u8:
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.faq.gz
xterm.faq.gz says:
How do I report bugs?
You should report bugs to me.
At the top of the file it says Thomas E. Dickey
Might that be [EMAIL PROTECTED] That information is not something that
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/xrdb.1x.gz
on the man page
-cpp filename
mentions an argument, however
-query This option indicates that the current contents of the speci‐
fied properties should be
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: wishlist
I found a file who's name looks like it was not removed upon purge.
$ dlocate /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99xfree86-common_start
$
But I'm not sure. And not sure what package to blame.
Maybe it was left behind on purpose.
--
To
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: minor
I can do
$ xterm -e su
fine, but
$ uxterm -e su
just seems to be like
$ uxterm -e cat
OK, maybe on the uxterm man page, say to try,
$ xterm -u8 -e su
which I figured out from doing pstree and man luit.
Maybe note on the uxterm man page that
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.faq.gz
Tags: upstream
We attempt to get a larger font in uxterm.
We see
How do I change the font size?
This is in the manpage, in MENUS.
X Consortium xterm provides popup menus, by pressing the
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: minor
I can do
$ xterm -e su
fine, but
$ uxterm -e su
just seems to be like
$ uxterm -e cat
This seems to work for me - but I'm using current xterm (patch #209).
At the moment I don't recall any fixes
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.faq.gz
Tags: upstream
and what does xterm -v say?
iirc, that's #202. The version of Xorg is irrelevant.
We attempt to get a larger font in uxterm.
We see
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: normal
File: /usr/X11R6/bin/uxterm
No idea why uxterm dies half a second after started in about 2/3rds on
invocations on Linux 2.6.12 on Thinkpad r50e. However, on Linux
2.6.14-2-k7 it starts every time.
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.faq.gz
xterm.faq.gz says:
How do I report bugs?
You should report bugs to me.
At the top of the file it says Thomas E. Dickey
Might that be [EMAIL
Package: libx11-dev
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
This man page does not discuss the actual return values of the
function, but says they are of type Status. One might assume
that this means you could compare it with the Success macro.
One would be wrong.
The X
23 matches
Mail list logo
