On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 13:35 -0500, rick bradshaw wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.5.7.3-3
> Severity: normal
>
>
> I am running into a problem with Suspend/Resume through APM on my x31
> laptop. This was not an issue until the latest update. What happens is that
> when I
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:21:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libx11: FTBFS in experimental.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Author: vorlon
Date: 2006-04-18 02:30:08 -0400 (Tue, 18 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1844
Added:
tags/data/xkb-data-legacy/1.0.1-4/
tags/data/xkb-data-legacy/1.0.1-4/debian/changelog
tags/data/xkb-data-legacy/1.0.1-4/debian/control
Removed:
tags/data/xkb-data-legacy/1.0.1-4/debian/changelog
Author: vorlon
Date: 2006-04-18 02:29:36 -0400 (Tue, 18 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1843
Removed:
tags/data/xkb-data-legacy/1.0.1-4/
Log:
revert tag
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: vorlon
Date: 2006-04-18 02:29:10 -0400 (Tue, 18 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1842
Modified:
trunk/data/xkb-data-legacy-1.0.1/debian/changelog
trunk/data/xkb-data-legacy-1.0.1/debian/control
Log:
add missing quilt build-dep
Modified: trunk/data/xkb-data-legacy-1.0.1/debian/changelog
=
Author: vorlon
Date: 2006-04-18 02:25:50 -0400 (Tue, 18 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1841
Added:
tags/data/xkb-data-legacy/1.0.1-4/
Log:
tag the 1.0.1-4 upload
Copied: tags/data/xkb-data-legacy/1.0.1-4 (from rev 1840,
trunk/data/xkb-data-legacy-1.0.1)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.14
Severity: minor
My old xorg.conf contained this:
# If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated
# again, run the following commands as root:
#
# cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.custom
# md5sum /etc/X11/xorg.conf >
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.14
Severity: normal
When doing dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg you have two choices of mouse
driver: ImPS/2 and ExplorerPS/2. No matter which you choose the
configuration always ends up with ExplorerPS/2. Running dpkg-reconfigure
excessives times shows the defaul
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:51:58AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Steve Langasek [Sun, Apr 16 2006, 04:58:25PM]:
> > If you ask me, I think it's better to keep the vast majority of irritating
> > bugs confined to unstable, and only make users of stable deal with the
> > single issue of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> merge 363157 362940
Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't find default fixed font
Bug#363157: x11-common: recent path change breaks kdm & gdm
Merged 362940 363157.
>
End of m
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:13:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363157: x11-common: recent path change breaks kdm & gdm
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Version: 1:7.0.13
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> severity 363157 serious
Bug#363157: x11-common: recent path change breaks kdm & gdm
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 363157 362940
Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't f
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: normal
Following the transition to xkb-data and xkeyboard-config, I was
told to put my customized xkb files aside and make the server use
them by setting the XKBPATH. However, setting the XKBPATH variable
didn't work (seems like the variable was i
Package: xorg-server
Version: 1:1.0.2-5
Severity: important
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause
your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer
is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and amd64.
[1]http://people.debian.org/~dann
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 363198 xbase-clients: implicit pointer conversion
Bug#363198: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Log for successful build of
xbase-clients_1:7.0.0-4 (dist=unstable)]
Changed Bug title.
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PRO
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.0.0-4
Severity: important
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause
your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer
is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and amd64.
[1]http://people.debian.org/~da
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.14
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After an apt-get dist-upgrade today, the X server would no longer start.
Running "startx" gave no output, and when gdm refused to start up it gave no
error message.
This was apparently solved when
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.14
Severity: normal
During a dpkg-reconfigure, xserver-xorg reports the above message.
If I first load the efivars module, it seems to run dmidecode and is ok.
I haven't looked at the configuration code, so I don't know if this breaks
anything or not.
-- Sy
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2
Severity: important
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause
your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer
is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and amd64.
i830_rotate.c uses
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> severity 356300 important
Bug#356300: xserver-xorg: Hurd support for Xorg 7.0 X server
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
I just upgraded to Xorg 7.0 in unstable and X still doesn't work without
mga_hal.
Using the Option
Option "UseFBDev" "true"
however, makes it work!
So as long as Matrox doesn't supply a new mga_hal that works with Xorg > 6.8.2
and nobody fixes mga_drv, you can use fbdev to get an X ses
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
GDM & KDM fails to start because they can't find /usr/X11R6/bin/X
you have to mkdir /usr/X11R6/bin && ln -s /usr/bin/X /usr/X11R6/bin/X
to make it work again.
-- System Information:
Debian Relea
Package: libxklavier10
Version: 2.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: patch
This fixes a bug that has been bothering a rather large ammount of
people. AFAICS libxklavier can't do zilch without this fix.
The patch:
--- libxklavier-2.2.orig/libxklavier/xklavier_co
In case anyone reading this is looking for instructions for getting their X
Server back up (like I was):
It seems that changing the soft link /usr/lib/X11/fonts to point
to /usr/share/fonts/X11 is enough.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Dear Jerome
Thank you for that, I didn't really see how having the nvidia driver
present mattered when I had the system set to use the (debian, GPL) nv
driver and gdm still couldn't find it to start x. I still say that the
package maintainers need to address compatibility problems with
/etc/X
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: normal
Today, when upgrading etch, I got this error with x11-common:
Preparando para reemplazar x11-common 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 (usando
.../x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-6_all.deb) ...
Desempaquetando el reemplazo de x11-common ...
dpkg: error al procesa
Hi,
>> > Thanks. Apparently, the driver only detects the internal display in
>> both
>> > cases. You're saying neither case works with this config file? Does it
>> > make a difference if it's already docked on bootup? Or if you use
>> Option
>> > "MonitorLayout" "TMDS" when docked?
>> No, it works
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Followup-For: Bug #362894
Dear X Force,
I would like to join Norbert in this. My X Server has been
rendered non-functional by the last upgrade, because the
fixed font is not found. I also see failures to load the
modules "speedo" and "GLCore", which is prob
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.5.7.3-3
Severity: normal
I am running into a problem with Suspend/Resume through APM on my x31
laptop. This was not an issue until the latest update. What happens is that
when I resume my laptop I get a garbled display, with a working mouse, and I
c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> merge 362891 363086
Bug#362891: xserver-xorg: post-installation script fails during install
Bug#363086: xserver-xorg: preinstallation scripts fails with error 64
Merged 362891 363086.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:50:39PM +0100, Joshua Kite wrote:
> unnecessarily abrasive. I don't really understand what you mean by
> saying that it's not working BECAUSE I have been trying to use the
> Nvidia driver. I know that in the past, Debian did not support the
> nvidia binary drivers and
OK, I forwarded it. Here's the upstream bugzilla entry:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6635
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
There is no reason ever to have the same thought twice, unless you
like having that thought -- David Allen, "Ge
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:18:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362097: fixed in xcursor-themes 1.0.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:32:58 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363086: xserver-xorg: preinstallation scripts fails with
error 64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Version: 1:7.0.14
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> severity 363086 grave
Bug#363086: xserver-xorg: preinstallation scripts fails with error 64
Severity set to `grave'.
> notfound 363086 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
Bug#363086: xserver-xorg: prei
Hello,
A new version of ati driver into cvs solved this bug:
http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/
This version can be pushed into sid ?
Thank you all for the good work with linux, keep up with it ! :)
--
Auzanneau Grégory
GPG 0x99137BEE
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:59:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356420: xfonts-utils: FTBFS: Missing build dependency.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg
did NOT work (complaining of a customised file) and so I had to
mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.old.20060417
The new xorg.conf looked very different indeed to the old one based on
the old xfree86 XF86config-4 from the XF86 => xorg transition.
I still had
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-17 13:11:12 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1840
Added:
tags/data/xcursor-themes/xcursor-themes-1.0.1-3/
Log:
Tag upload of xcursor-themes-1.0.1-3 to unstable
Copied: tags/data/xcursor-themes/xcursor-themes-1.0.1-3 (from rev 1839,
trunk/data/xcursor-them
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 363042 important
Bug#363042: xserver-xorg: Complete freeze, absolute blockage
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363021: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:32:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362750: fixed in xorg-server 1:1.0.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362891: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:32:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362246: fixed in xorg-server 1:1.0.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362992: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363081: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-17 12:43:02 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1839
Added:
tags/debian/xorg/xorg-7.0.14/
Log:
Tag upload of xorg-7.0.14 to unstable
Copied: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-7.0.14 (from rev 1838, trunk/debian/xorg)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 340993 mesa-utils 6.3.2-2
Bug#340993: xbase-clients: man-pages for glxinfo and maybe glxgears should
mention LIBGL_DEBUG environemt variable
Bug reassigned from package `xbase-clients' to `mesa-utils'.
> retitle 340993 manpages for glxinfo an
reassign 340993 mesa-utils 6.3.2-2
retitle 340993 manpages for glxinfo and maybe glxgears should mention
LIBGL_DEBUG environment variable
thanks
Am Sonntag, den 27.11.2005, 17:38 +0100 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10
> Severity: wishlist
[..]
> The man
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-17 12:30:57 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1838
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/rules
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/scripts/vars.alpha
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/scripts/vars.amd64
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/scripts
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-17 12:16:19 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1837
Added:
tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.2-5/
Removed:
tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.2-5.real/
Log:
All better
Copied: tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.2-5 (from rev 1836,
tags
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-17 12:16:02 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1836
Added:
tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.2-4/
Removed:
tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.2-5/
Log:
Fix old tag
Copied: tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.2-4 (from rev 1835,
tags/xse
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-17 12:15:31 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1835
Added:
tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.2-5.real/
Removed:
tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.2-5/xorg-server-1.0.2/
Log:
Wtf just happened
Copied: tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-17 12:08:51 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1834
Added:
tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.2-5/xorg-server-1.0.2/
Log:
Tag upload of xorg-server-1.0.2-5 to unstable
Copied: tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.0.2-5/xorg-server-1.0.2 (from
rev 18
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-17 12:00:59 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1833
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
Log:
* Make x11-common not depend on laptop-detect. This is now only recommended
by xserver-xorg. Thanks Marc Wilson. (closes
Salvador Fandiño wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> the xserver-xorg version I was trying to install was
> xserver-xorg_1%3a7.0.12_all.deb
The new version 1:7.0.13 should fix this, a workaround is installing
discover1 before upgrading.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nv
Version: 1:1.0.1.5-2
Severity: normal
Backtrace:
0: /usr/X11R6/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x88) [0x80b8c78]
1: [0xe420]
2:
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libxaa.so(XAAFillMono8x8PatternRectsScreenOrigin+0x94)
[0xa683a7c4]
3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libxaa.so(XAAPaintWindow+0x4ac
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:02:44AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> This is somewhat of a regression: --disable-all --enable=pci,sbus should
> be passed, since IIRC those are the only two buses we support scanning.
> Otherwise, you try to scan stuff like the USB bus, and the whole things
> just hangs o
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> if [ ! -L "/usr/X11R6/bin" ] && [ -d "/usr/X11R6/bin" ]; then
>> is more readable.
> More readable, not as portable.
Which systems have problems with that? [ ! sometest ] is
posix-compatible.
cu and- just wondering -reas
--
The 'Galactic C
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:08:22AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:21:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The 7.0 transition seems to have killed /usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg/script,
> > which means bug reports are going to come in with a lot less information
> > than they
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 01:16:57 +0100 Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:14:33PM +0200, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xorg
> > > Version: 1:7.0.12
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification:
nfigure -phigh xserver-xorg
>
> did NOT work (complaining of a customised file) and so I had to
>
> mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.old.20060417
>
> The new xorg.conf looked very different indeed to the old one based on
> the old xfree86 XF86config-4 from the XF86
Hi,
the xserver-xorg version I was trying to install was
xserver-xorg_1%3a7.0.12_all.deb
- Salva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:09:44PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2006-04-17 Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Suggested patch:
>
> > --- debian/x11-common.postinst.in~ 2006-04-15 18:33:45.0 +0200
> > +++ debian/x11-common.postinst.in 2006-04-17 15:16:42.0
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.0.0-4
Severity: important
When I run xmag, then click somewhere to magnify, I get the following error:
$ xmag
Warning: Missing charsets in String to FontSet conversion
Warning: Unable to load any usable fontset
Warning: Cannot convert string "8x13bold" to type
severity 363079 normal
merge 363079 362846
thanks
On Monday 17 April 2006 15:28, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> -if [ ! -L -e -d "/usr/X11R6/bin" ]; then
> +if ! [ -L "/usr/X11R6/bin" ] && [ -d "/usr/X11R6/bin" ]; then
This bug was already filed as #362846 and was already fixed, though the
fixed version
On 2006-04-17 Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Suggested patch:
> --- debian/x11-common.postinst.in~ 2006-04-15 18:33:45.0 +0200
> +++ debian/x11-common.postinst.in 2006-04-17 15:16:42.0 +0200
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
>fi
> fi
> -if [ ! -L -e -d "/usr/X1
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:05:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363079: x11-common postinst fails about broken test
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:55:27AM +0200, Daniele Venzano wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:31:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 03:25:55AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > Did discover change behavior recently?
> >
> > Nope -- but xserver-xorg did, by just changing t
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: important
When upgrading, x-window-system-core had an unmet dependency on
xserver-xorg, which failed during preconfigure. pre-inst (not post-inst)
exited with an exit status of 64.
I emptied /usr/X11R6/bin of the three remaining files.
Sam
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:05:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363079: x11-common postinst fails about broken test
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:05:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363079: x11-common postinst fails about broken test
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
/etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.old.20060417
The new xorg.conf looked very different indeed to the old one based on
the old xfree86 XF86config-4 from the XF86 => xorg transition.
I still had problems with 'missing' modules which the following 'fixed'
ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:21:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.0.12
> Severity: minor
>
> The 7.0 transition seems to have killed /usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg/script,
> which means bug reports are going to come in with a lot less information
> than they did b
On 4/17/06, Tom Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had this exact same problem when doing a fresh install on unstable, I
> managed to get around it by just doing: "apt-get remove discover"
> As mentioned earlier, it must be a discover problem in the script.
> Apparently this also gets around b
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hi,
While upgrading my system with apt-get upgrade, installation
of xserver-xorg failed on the preinstallation script with
error 64 (no other info was made available).
Now the entire X subsys
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 363079 normal
Bug#363079: x11-common postinst fails about broken test
Severity set to `normal'.
> merge 363079 362846
Bug#362846: /var/lib/dpkg/info/x11-common.postinst: line 918: [: too many
arguments
Bug#363079: x11-common postinst fails ab
Package: x11-common
Version: 7.0.12
Severity: important
The x11-common package still depends on laptop-detect, which pulls in
dmidecode, even though the other hardware detection tools have been
pushed back to recommends (see bug #362253).
I have checked the 7.0.13 currently in incoming, and it st
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Log:
> * Make x-window-system and x-window-system-core transitional packages that
> depend on the xorg package. These packages will smooth upgrades from sarge
> and will be removed upon the release of etch.
[...]
> +++ trunk/d
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-17 10:13:30 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1832
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
Log:
* Make x-window-system and x-window-system-core transitional packages that
depend on the xorg package. These packages wi
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-17 10:10:08 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1831
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
Log:
Add closer
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/chan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 363051 l10n
Bug#363051: [INTL:ro] xserver-xorg: regresion: Please add back the Romanian
translation of the debconf templates
There were no tags set.
Tags added: l10n
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
Package: x11-common
Version: 7.0.12
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The postinst script fails:
# dpkg -i x11-common_1%3a7.0.12_amd64.deb
(Reading database ... 76526 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace x11-common 1:7.0.10 (using
x11-common_1%3a7.0.12_amd64.deb) ...
Unpa
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:23:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362869: No direct rendering for radeon 9100 IGP
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Package: xserver-xorg
Tag: l10n
Severity: minor
Hello,
I have found that recent versions of xserver-xorg do not include the
translated debconf teplates for Romanian (I just checked, and it did).
Bug #338547 suggests this was included in xorg-x11/6.8.2.dfsg.1-11,
and it was.
It looks to me that o
Hello!
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 10:53:39 +0100, Nyk Tarr wrote:
> I noticed I had a $HOME littered with .serverauth. files, after
> a bit of prodding, I found that if startx is cut short by eg a
> shutdown, it doesn't get as far as deleting the $xserverauthfile
> file.
This bug is still present in
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Xscreensaver freezes the system, no 'control+alt+backspace', no
'control+alt+F?' functionality. Only unpluging the cord works. The
solution I have found is to disable Xscreensaver.
Video driver used:
Subject: xorg: no xfonts-base left after update
Followup-For: Bug #362894
Package: xorg
Version: 7.0.12
*** Please type your report below this line ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i3
Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.0.1-6
Severity: normal
Hello,
as the title suggests, xdm ignores my ~/.xinitrc.
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental'
On Monday 17 April 2006 09:57, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:28:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > A potential other issue is that paths for fonts and modules have
> > changed and thus changes in the X configuration file may be needed.
> > Whether this really is an issue depends on
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: minor
The 7.0 transition seems to have killed /usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg/script,
which means bug reports are going to come in with a lot less information
than they did before. Accidental omission, or deliberate change?
--
Steve Langasek
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:31:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 03:25:55AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > Did discover change behavior recently?
>
> Nope -- but xserver-xorg did, by just changing to accept discover as an
> (apparently untested) alternative to discover1.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:40:36AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Author: dnusinow
> Date: 2006-04-17 02:40:35 -0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006)
> New Revision: 1829
>
> Modified:
>trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
>trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in
> Log:
> * G
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:00:15AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Added:
>
> trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/patches/12_security_policy_in_etc.diff
>trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/mkinstalldirs
> Log:
> Actually add patch as well as build system script installe
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:17:28AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 19:24 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:24:21AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > > Painfully, we may have to proceed with
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:28:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> A potential other issue is that paths for fonts and modules have changed
> and thus changes in the X configuration file may be needed. Whether this
> really is an issue depends on how well conversion of old X11 config files
> is suppor
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line
The following packages have unmet dependencies: x-window-system-core: Depends:
xserver-xorg
xserver-xorg failed to preconfigure, with exit status 64
-- System Information:
Debian Relea
#include
* Steve Langasek [Sun, Apr 16 2006, 04:58:25PM]:
> If you ask me, I think it's better to keep the vast majority of irritating
> bugs confined to unstable, and only make users of stable deal with the
> single issue of moving their files out of /usr/X11R6/bin; which is why I
> asked David
98 matches
Mail list logo
