Re: [ubuntu-x] pushing Ubuntu changes to xorg.git

Quoting Bryce Harrington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:38:36PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: I've just pushed five changes from Ubuntu xorg to alioth xorg.git.. Hopefully they all are useful, and if not, easily reverted :) What is alioth? Alioth, aka alioth.debian.org,

Bug#440174: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Same problem on ATI Radeon 7500

Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati Version: 1:6.7.195-2 Followup-For: Bug #440174 Hi ! I have just upgraded and get the same problem on an ATI 7500: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500] I have two Dell E176FP with absolutely the same configuration

Bug#192609: Where have you been?

Hello! I am bored this afternoon. I am nice girl that would like to chat with you. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, because I am writing not from my personal email. If you would like to see some of my pictures. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#202923: Let's chat

Hello! I am bored tonight. I am nice girl that would like to chat with you. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, because I am writing not from my personal email. I will show you some great pictures of me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Git Usage Page on XSF Wiki - bad link

On this immutable wiki page: http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/git-usage The link: http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter.html should be changed to: http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter/index.html [i'm not subscribed to this list] -- --gh -- To

Re: Git Usage Page on XSF Wiki - bad link

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:19:40 -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote: On this immutable wiki page: http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/git-usage The link: http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter.html should be changed to:

Re: Git Usage Page on XSF Wiki - bad link

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:19:40 -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote: On this immutable wiki page: http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/git-usage The link: http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter.html should be changed to:

xserver-xorg-input-mouse_1%3a1.2.2-6_i386.deb

Hi, Not sure if this is the correct place. I just want to report that since I installed this package, my mouse cannot single-click anymore. Everything gets double-clicked, and I had to downgrade to xserver-xorg-input-mouse_1%3a1.2.2-1_i386.deb From the SID distribution. Kind Regards Stefan

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

Dear Debian X Strike Force, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xfs: = This package has 2 RC bug(s) more than 21 days old: - #50859 http://bugs.debian.org/50859 xfs: daemon runs as root - #202096 http://bugs.debian.org/202096 xfs:

Re: xserver-xorg-input-mouse_1%3a1.2.2-6_i386.deb

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 16:59:51 +0200, Stef wrote: Hi, Not sure if this is the correct place. I just want to report that since I installed this package, my mouse cannot single-click anymore. Everything gets double-clicked, and I had to downgrade to

Bug#447526: xserver leaks memory

Not long after I reported this problem, the system OOM'd and iceweasel got killed (along with a gitk instance, but I only mention it for completeness, I don't believe he was much guilty). Now the formerly-growing mem areas are completely gone from X: |$ diff -u X-19813.map /proc/19813/maps |---

Re: Bug#431756: ITP: compiz-bcop -- Compiz option code generator

hi emilio, thanks for the work on this! the biggest problem that we had been facing thus far is that the debian-x folks are very reluctant to take on management of cdbs-based packaging, which is why i never just took and cross-ported ubuntu's packages (which is what you've used as a basis for

Re: Bug#431756: ITP: compiz-bcop -- Compiz option code generator

sean finney ha scritto: hi emilio, thanks for the work on this! the biggest problem that we had been facing thus far is that the debian-x folks are very reluctant to take on management of cdbs-based packaging, which is why i never just took and cross-ported ubuntu's packages (which is what

Re: Bug#431756: ITP: compiz-bcop -- Compiz option code generator

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:19:58PM +0200, sean finney wrote: hi emilio, thanks for the work on this! the biggest problem that we had been facing thus far is that the debian-x folks are very reluctant to take on management of cdbs-based packaging, which is why i never just took and

Re: Bug#431756: ITP: compiz-bcop -- Compiz option code generator

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:26:21PM +0200, Emilio Scalise wrote: I don't know how actually pkg-xorg maintain packages, I must read something about it (perhaps googling ;-) ).. What are the advantages? We maintain our packages using git on alioth.debian.org[0]. We have a mailing list that all

Meeting for etch and a half

(sorry for the nasty cross-posting) hey, Now that 2.6.23 is out and the proposed timeframe for etch 1/2 is just over two months away, its probably a good time to start making some progress on an etch 1/2. Perhaps we should start with an IRC meeting? I've created a wiki page here with an

Processed: Tagging upstream

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 442316 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7067 Bug#442316: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: evdev from experimental messes up my keyboard layout Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

Bug#166335: dancing shoes

your an ahole...check this out http://constantpated.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]