Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:50:42PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> short shot with mozilla,
[...]
>> OTOH the quality was quite bad, blurred and greyish looking. Once I try
>> to configure the beast it might get better.
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:50:42PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> short shot with mozilla,
[...]
>> OTOH the quality was quite bad, blurred and greyish looking. Once I try
>> to configure the beast it might get better
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:14:06PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> How about shipping /etc/X11/Xsession.d/75xprt-xprintorg_setenv
>> consisting only of
>> -
>> XPSERVERLIST="`/etc/init
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those who have been waiting for it, the Xprint package from xprint.org
> (or rather, xprint.mozdev.org) is now available. Packages xprt-xprintorg
> (server binary) and xprt-common (config files).
Thanks.
[...]
> In README.Debian, I recommended settin
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:14:06PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> How about shipping /etc/X11/Xsession.d/75xprt-xprintorg_setenv
>> consisting only of
>> -
>> XPSERVERLIST="`/etc/init
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those who have been waiting for it, the Xprint package from xprint.org
> (or rather, xprint.mozdev.org) is now available. Packages xprt-xprintorg
> (server binary) and xprt-common (config files).
Thanks.
[...]
> In README.Debian, I recommended setti
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]:
>> UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available.
>> See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS
> Is there a reason these shouldn't be versioned 9potato1 so i
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]:
>> UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available.
>> See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS
> Is there a reason these shouldn't be versioned 9potato1 so
Christoffer Gurell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i dont know if im correct but
> mickelina:~$ ls /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86*
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86dga.a /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86rush.a
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86misc.a /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86vm.a
> why arent there any .so versions of these files??
Christoffer Gurell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i dont know if im correct but
> mickelina:~$ ls /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86*
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86dga.a /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86rush.a
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86misc.a /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86vm.a
> why arent there any .so versions of these files?
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feedback to debian-x, please.
I just tested the i386-packages (Matrox G200), upgrading from -7 was
smooth and I didn't find any problems.
thanks for your work, cu andreas
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feedback to debian-x, please.
I just tested the i386-packages (Matrox G200), upgrading from -7 was
smooth and I didn't find any problems.
thanks for your work, cu andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In other news, automatic usage of xmodmap on X session startup is now
> deprecated.
[snip]
> and the Xsession manual page describes how
> to write a replacement for /etc/X11/Xsession.d/40xfree86-common_xmodmap. Of
> cour
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In other news, automatic usage of xmodmap on X session startup is now
> deprecated.
[snip]
> and the Xsession manual page describes how
> to write a replacement for /etc/X11/Xsession.d/40xfree86-common_xmodmap. Of
> co
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
