lnx_ev56 with the right build flags gives me a working X server
again. :)
Patch to follow soon.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
| xserver-xorg-video-1.0 were insufficient to pull in
xserver-xorg-video-all on upgrade in many cases. I don't know whether
adding in the -vesa is going to make a difference, but using packaging tools
that ignore recommends is... not recommended.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
at any time.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
be available AIUI, so
why should the metapackage need to be pulled in before xfonts-base is?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
xserver-xorg installed but
your xorg.conf was not automatically updated for you, please open a bug on
xserver-xorg.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Millennium II (pci) on my DEC Alpha machine.
Done (and I know your pain :).
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
severity 395927 serious
severity 396279 important
thanks
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:29:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
The Sarge package xlbiff includes the file /usr/X11R6/bin/xlbiff
The xlbiff package in sarge is at version 4.1-1, and x11-common in etch
already has a conflicts
(1)
The Sarge package xlbiff includes the file /usr/X11R6/bin/xlbiff
The xlbiff package in sarge is at version 4.1-1, and x11-common in etch
already has a conflicts: with xlbiff (= 4.1-1.1). Do you have any idea
what's missing here?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
was upgraded at the same time? Could this be
related to bug #394060?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
the
*proper* symbols instead of a poor approximation -- mistranslating «» as
Doubled isn't going to change the symbols actually used, so if there
are any encoding issues at all, might as well expose them /before/ the user
selects that option ;)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
can't,
in which case explanations don't make the option in question any more
desirable...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
/dpkg.log?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
):
db_input $PRIORITY $TEMPLATE
retval=$?
if [ $retval -ne 0 ] ; then debug_echo v_s_d_i/db_input $PRIORITY
$TEMPLATE
; fi
if [ $? -eq 30 ]; then
The last line should use $retval as well instead of $?, shouldn't it?
Yes, it should.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
any objections by Sunday evening
(UTC-0700), I will proceed with a 0-day NMU of mesa to get Xorg 7.1 unstuck.
Test packages will also be available shortly from
http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/mesa/.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 12:10:56PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 04:29:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
A Hurd porter would of course be able to do their own subsequent NMU if
they're confident in this patch.
OK, do you prefer us to NMU it right after yours, or when
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:28:45AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
tags 368582 patch
tags 384057 patch
tags 384282 patch
tags 386185 patch
tags 369895 patch
thanks
I think that this NMU will also fix #359328, won't it?
Yes; that bug can be considered closed once
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 02:08:46PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 02:29:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:28:45AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
tags 368582 patch
tags 384057 patch
tags 384282 patch
tags 386185
way or another.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
as for experimental, and honor this decision in my NMU.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:02:44PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:11:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I will also be fixing this bug and bug #386185 in the process.
Please also apply the last patch in #358065
the build of libx11 1.0.1.
Then we have a problem, given that David says the new libx11 is not
targetted for etch and the new x11proto-core is already there.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
updates.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:33:44AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:00:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Clarification: the libxfixes change is a shlibs change, not an soname
change. (soversion normally refers to the numeric component of an soname;
apparently xorg
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:05:51PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:08:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:33:44AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:00:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Clarification: the libxfixes change
the reference to cursor
in fonts.dir there.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
mismatch.
already fixed in incoming.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
package is the cause, and try
upgrading to the version in incoming.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 04:53:56PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:06:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:48:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:05:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Since this warning note has been
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:48:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:05:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Since this warning note has been added specifically because the xserver is
being removed in situations we don't want it to, and the removal is being
caused by a new
in the first place.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
that
this *still* hasn't happened on this bug. :)
Thanks for the sanity checking!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
to a symlink, which you're certainly not the only user to
object to. I'd be grateful if you were able to come up with a better
solution, given that third-party software that *references* files no longer
in /usr/X11R6/bin is also a concern.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
update-fonts-dir
do this, except perhaps a sense of it being cleaner not to.
I propose the following snnippet to be sent to control@:
Everything except the fixed part, since it's not decided yet whether the
remainder is entirely an xfonts-utils bug. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me
proceeded fine...
Uh, please check the output of ls -ld /usr/X11R6/bin. This should now be a
symlink to /usr/bin, but by overriding the conflict it may have been left as
a directory (or even removed from the system).
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
in gnupg-agent here; at most, the
x11-common workaround affects the severity of the gnupg-agent bug, but it's
still a gnupg-agent bug. And it's still a bug that would manifest when
installing gnupg-agent on a sarge system (partial upgrades), so it should
still be fixed.
--
Steve Langasek
.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
alone as I can't imagine any way that would cause an X
server to crash *or* cause an app to chew up memory.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-submitting idiots!
The proper fix here is to pass --disable-xprint to the configure script for
xbdebizzy, so that the package neither fails to build nor builds with
different dependencies in the presence of libxp-dev.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
and XFree86 4.3)?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
This is absolutely not the same bug as was reported earlier, and unless you
can tell us how to reproduce this upgrade that nuked /usr/lib/X11/config, I
don't imagine your bug will be fixable.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 04:42:18PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:12:08AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
David,
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:32:09PM -0700, David Nusinow wrote:
* Conflict with old versions of xfonts-base. Thanks Toni Mueller.
(closes
.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
( the
XSF) to decide whether this is an appropriate solution.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
dependency from libfontenc1 to xfonts-encodings appropriate? This
would parallel the dependency of xserver-common on xfonts-base in previous
versions, I think.
Thoughts, XSF? Will an encodings.dir containing absolute paths actually
work?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
-nectec package (the one that
spawned this bug), so 363482 should be closeable with no further
modifications of that package.
Off to poke at update-fonts-scale now. :)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 03:26:43AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
- update-fonts-scale something something. I dunno, this probably parallels
u-f-a, but I haven't tested it yet.
Oh neat, that was way more simple than I expected it to be;
update-fonts-scale already has the line-wise parsing
/X11R7 if present, which would mean that
debhelper-using packages updated for the current xorg7 layout would be
non-buggy even after rebuild.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
), but it's
still rather nasty...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/Xsession.xfree86 back to
/etc/X11/Xsession, or use dpkg --force-confmiss to restore it from the .deb.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
urgent upgrade problem fixed.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
.
Does that version predate the addition of the xfree86-common conflicts?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
not going to use the template. Since the purpose of this code is
to convert the values for this question, and there are no other uses of this
question in the config or postinst scripts, I think the correct solution is
to simply drop this block of code from the config script.
--
Steve Langasek
directory
structure is used.
This part also hasn't definitely shaken out yet I think, so it's probably
premature to try to fix up policy to match.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
you describe above do not strictly require the
Pre-Depends in order to address them, but the Pre-Depends is necessary to
fix *some* of the problems with this package and happens to also be
sufficient for fixing the others.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
on the mule-ucs package and the dependancy hasn't been set
yet. :)
Hmm, two different bugs then I guess. I've reassigned a copy of this bug
back to emacs21 for the emacs maintainers to look at.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
any explicit depends on libxrender..
Unfortunately not. The candidate set of affected packages is all packages
which transitively build-depend on libxrender-dev or libxcursor-dev and ship
.la files. A very irritating set to calculate...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
now in the svn repo, so this should be taken care of the next
time David uploads (along with a number of other conflicts).
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, which
breaks X11. Please conflict with this version of wmnet.
Committed to svn.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
packages suffer from the same problem; when each package has to be fixed
separately, it's not very helpful to have a single bug report with a single
open/closed state...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
/lib/libviaXvMC.so.1
/usr/lib/libviaXvMCPro.so
/usr/lib/libviaXvMCPro.so.1
Aha, so they are.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
of libx11-6 you were installing.
I see no way that this bug could happen with the current code; the error
message occurs only when support for the named transport has not been
compiled into the library, and 'local' is a transport that should be
compiled in unconditionally.
--
Steve Langasek
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:20:32AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 16:14 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:43:31AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:55:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Is it reasonable/appropriate
, but that would be wrong when the
only thing you need from that package is a directory.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:26:37PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 18 avril 2006 à 11:14 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
The postinst contains the following:
if [ -d /usr/X11R6/bin ] [ ! -L /usr/X11R6/bin ]; then
rmdir /usr/X11R6/bin || die Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin
,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
Description:
xkb-data-legacy - Classic XKB data
Closes: 362099
Hello,
Is it reasonable/appropriate for libxcursor1 to continue to support
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/icons as a fallback search path, in order to provide as
smooth an upgrade as possible?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
Hello,
xserver-xorg-video-glint (1:1.0.1.3-3) unstable; urgency=high
* High-urgency upload for RC bugfix.
* Add x11proto-fonts-dev to Build-Depends; thanks to Daniel Schepler
for noting this. (closes: #362143)
-- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:46:47 -0700
tags 363267 patch
thanks
Attached is a proposed fix for this bug. Any objections?
BTW, David, you seem to have not committed the last two xutils-dev patches
to the svn tree. :/
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
: source all
Version: 1.0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
xkb-data-legacy - Classic XKB data
Closes: 362099
Changes:
xkb-data-legacy (1.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
: important one,
though.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to.
If you do compile a list of files that you believe came from packages, what
do you do with them if you find them still there when it's time to turn
/usr/X11R6/bin into a symlink?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 01:21:51PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 02:24:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Attached is a proposed fix for this bug. Any objections?
Looks fine to me.
Eugene did actually raise an objection on IRC; here's a revised patch which
confines
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:43:31AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:55:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Is it reasonable/appropriate for libxcursor1 to continue to support
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/icons as a fallback search path, in order to provide as
smooth an upgrade
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 04:32:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:21:14AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On the other side, how do we ensure that cursor themes aren't upgraded
before the libraries that need to access them? I think having cursors
conflict
/tmp/libxcursor/usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1|grep icons
~/.icons:/usr/share/icons:/usr/share/pixmaps:/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/icons
$
Yes, apparently so.
In that case, what is the source of this bug report on xcursor-themes?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: minor
The 7.0 transition seems to have killed /usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg/script,
which means bug reports are going to come in with a lot less information
than they did before. Accidental omission, or deliberate change?
--
Steve Langasek
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:51:58AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Steve Langasek [Sun, Apr 16 2006, 04:58:25PM]:
If you ask me, I think it's better to keep the vast majority of irritating
bugs confined to unstable, and only make users of stable deal with the
single issue
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Hmm, this was supposed to have been fixed in xserver-xorg 1:7.0.11 by
removing the symlink in question. :/ So there are two bugs here --
xserver-xorg needs to drop the symlink, and x11-common needs to bump its
-common. This needs to be fixed soon so that packages don't get uploaded
using the functional but buggy xutils 1.0.2-1.
The attached patch Works For Me when building autolock for X11R7.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
the file to /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin (the latter seems more
appropriate to me, the former will give you path compatibility) via the
/usr/X11R6/bin symlink).
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
xorg
Can you edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xorg.postinst to change the first
line to read #!/bin/sh -x and then run dpkg --configure --pending, and
post the output? This should give us a clear indication of what's failing.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
'fixed'.
This is a separate bug that I believe is being worked on.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
-common.preinst belongs in a
.config script, not in the preinst script, since the only thing being done
is renaming some debconf questions in the database.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world
are wrong...
If you don't have time to upload this tonight, I'd like to be able to NMU
(or upload what's currently labelled -13 in svn) to get this fixed.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
severity 362940 serious
tags 362940 -moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 04:28:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:14:33PM +0200, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders
with the
single issue of moving their files out of /usr/X11R6/bin; which is why I
asked David to implement this transition when it became clear that things
were breaking because of the move to /usr/bin.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:15:03AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Daniele Venzano wrote:
Package xserver-xorg fails to install on my system with the following
messages:
Setting up xserver-xorg
.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
as an
(apparently untested) alternative to discover1.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:52:52PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:09:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:05:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
The current xserver-xorg package
Hi Petteri,
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:13:20AM +0300, Petteri wrote:
rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Hakemisto ei ole tyhjä
x11-common postinst error: Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet empty
Please forward us a directory listing of /usr/X11R6/bin.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
)
-- assuming it's fixed in the next maintainer upload.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
transition. This means
And unfortunately, a look at the svn repo shows that there is almost *no*
revision history for trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in; or
else I would be happy to provide you with a quick diff to revert this
change. :/
--
Steve Langasek Give me
of the package, I think you'll miss having
/usr/bin/X disappear!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:02:02PM +0300, Petteri wrote:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 01:52:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Petteri,
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:13:20AM +0300, Petteri wrote:
rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Hakemisto ei ole tyhjä
x11-common postinst error: Could not remove /usr
this was removed in error.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:33:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 843K 2005-08-18 05:36 xfs-xtt
And this turns out to be a really sloppy bug in my code to find packages
that x11-common needs to conflict with, managing to completely miss the
stable-only packages
,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is a symlink is
broken and wrong; it leaves dpkg with an inconsistent view of package
contents, and will leave orphaned files behind if x11-common's symlink ever
goes away before the package installing to /usr/X11R6/bin does.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
just the timing that becomes an issue.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description
201 - 300 of 357 matches
Mail list logo
