On 04/24/13 10:28 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 04/24/13 10:00 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
On 04/24/13 06:58 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Alan Coopersmith
Hi Alan,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 04/24/13 10:28 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 04/24/13 10:00 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Alan Coopersmith
On 04/24/13 10:00 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
On 04/24/13 06:58 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
This broke my build:
Undefined first referenced
symbol
On 04/24/13 06:58 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
This broke my build:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
c2p_unsupported
../../../miext/shadow/.libs/libshadow.a(shafb4.o)
Builds fine
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
I'd prefer at least a BUG_WARN() over a no-op, to give us a hint why
stuff isn't working, though FatalError() also works for something that
should be impossible to hit.
How about this:
commit e779402d531625ba4ed5d628d06c6b1e06b2ec7b
On 04/24/13 11:29 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Alan,
Or does this code even need to be built for non-68k platforms at all?
No. I don't think Xfbdev already limits some options to certain platforms?
Not sure about that, I've not looked too closely at Xfbdev's build.
(I'm still confused
On 04/25/13 09:05 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
I'd prefer at least a BUG_WARN() over a no-op, to give us a hint why
stuff isn't working, though FatalError() also works for something that
should be impossible to hit.
How about this:
commit
Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org writes:
Geert Uytterhoeven (16):
miext/shadow/shpacked.c: Remove unused PickBit() define
test/input: Fix double-aligned test in dix_valuator_alloc() on m68k
KDrive: Bail out if screen initialization failed
Xfbdev: Make char
This broke my build:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
c2p_unsupported
../../../miext/shadow/.libs/libshadow.a(shafb4.o)
miext/shadow/c2p_core.h defines c2p_unsupported as an extern function, and
calls it from some inline functions, but
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
This broke my build:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
c2p_unsupported
../../../miext/shadow/.libs/libshadow.a(shafb4.o)
Builds fine with GCC; perhaps that figures out that this
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
On 04/24/13 06:58 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
This broke my build:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
c2p_unsupported
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 04/24/13 10:00 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
On 04/24/13 06:58 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
This broke my
Hi Keith.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org writes:
This patch series revives some of the support for Atari and Amiga that
existed
in XF68_FBDev, but got lost after XFree86 3.x.
I've reviewed the patches which may
Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org writes:
This patch series revives some of the support for Atari and Amiga that existed
in XF68_FBDev, but got lost after XFree86 3.x.
I've reviewed the patches which may affect other machines, and looked
briefly over the patches which don't. If you want
This patch series revives some of the support for Atari and Amiga that existed
in XF68_FBDev, but got lost after XFree86 3.x.
Generic:
- All non-packed frame buffer layouts use shadowfb, and fast c2 for
chunky-to-planar conversion.
- As the KDrive keyboard driver is broken, you have to
Uh, I think you accidentally sent this patch set five days early.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.orgwrote:
This patch series revives some of the support for Atari and Amiga that
existed
in XF68_FBDev, but got lost after XFree86 3.x.
Generic:
- All
On 03/27/2013 02:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
This patch series revives some of the support for Atari and Amiga that existed
in XF68_FBDev, but got lost after XFree86 3.x.
Whoa, that's pretty cool, thanks for that! I saw an older posting from
you on debian-68k [1] that you'd be working on
17 matches
Mail list logo