On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
[...]
The question is: Since the last xlib6g packages are empty packages
anyways... do you really need to Conflict: it?
I'd really like to force them off the system.
Could conflicting with xlib6g less-than say 4.3.0 help in getting us to
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:00:05AM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
For me it is: well, there are some websites I have to
look at with netscape since mozilla doesnt display
them (same for the submitter, if I understand him right);
and I like xv :)
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 08:53:05AM +1100, Neale Banks wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
[...]
The question is: Since the last xlib6g packages are empty packages
anyways... do you really need to Conflict: it?
I'd really like to force them off the system.
Could
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:38:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
There is no other chance currently, than repackage any package that
depends on xlib6g currently with modified control file.
I'd really like to force
reopen 233818
thanks
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
You may be able to rectify your problem, however, by using the equivs
Well, the problem is: as long as you Conflict: xlib6g in xlibs, nobody
will be able to install any package that even just
5 matches
Mail list logo
