Hi, Julien.
2011/9/25 Julien Cristau :
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 23:40:42 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
>
>> Hi, Kibi.
>>
>> On Feb 23 2011, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > Julien Cristau (28/09/2010):
>> > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:24:40 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > > > What happens with the
Hi, Kibi.
On Feb 23 2011, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau (28/09/2010):
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:24:40 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > What happens with the Debian kernel currently in unstable?
> > >
> > It has 8xx blacklisted from kms, so won't work with that driver.
> > 2.6.3
Julien Cristau (28/09/2010):
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:24:40 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > What happens with the Debian kernel currently in unstable?
> >
> It has 8xx blacklisted from kms, so won't work with that driver.
> 2.6.32-24 (to be uploaded today) should work though.
Hi Rogério,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:18, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:07:03 +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
>> (Note however that
>> 'man intel' suggests "shadow" option is disabled by default.)
>>
> We're turning it on for i8xx in the debian package to avoid hangs. I
> should fix the m
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:07:03 +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
> Hello Julien,
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 13:01, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 00:30:07 +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
> >
> >> Condensed noteworthy differences between old and new Xorg.0.log:
> >>
> >> < (==) int
Hello Julien,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 13:01, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 00:30:07 +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
>
>> Condensed noteworthy differences between old and new Xorg.0.log:
>>
>> < (==) intel(0): Shadow buffer enabled, GPU acceleration disabled.
>> < (II) intel(0): dir
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 00:30:07 +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
> Cyril,
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 18:29, you wrote:
> > You may want to try a newer version
> > It had some changes related to shadow, not sure what their impact is.
>
> Indeed the performance degradation is fixed in 2.13 version.
Dmitry Semyonov (21/10/2010):
> Indeed the performance degradation is fixed in 2.13 version. And
> although it is still not perfect (e.g. smooth scrolling of Gmail
> threads takes nearly 100% CPU, which IIRC was the same with a bunch
> of last releases), at least the driver is usable now on 865G
>
Cyril,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 18:29, you wrote:
> You may want to try a newer version
> It had some changes related to shadow, not sure what their impact is.
Indeed the performance degradation is fixed in 2.13 version. And
although it is still not perfect (e.g. smooth scrolling of Gmail
threads
Dmitry Semyonov (20/10/2010):
> The one that comes with Squeeze:
> linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (Version: 2.6.32-25)
OK, just checking.
> Attached.
Thanks, will look into that later. You may want to try a newer version
of the driver, which you'll find here:
http://autobuild.ikibiki.org/
It had s
Hello Cyril,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 15:37, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Dmitry Semyonov (20/10/2010):
>> After today's testing upgrade of xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.9.1-4
>> -> 2:2.12.0+shadow-2) 2D performance dropped to hardly usable state.
> which kernel are you running?
The one that come
Hi Dmitry,
Dmitry Semyonov (20/10/2010):
> After today's testing upgrade of xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.9.1-4
> -> 2:2.12.0+shadow-2) 2D performance dropped to hardly usable state.
> Page scrolling in Iceweasel and windows movements became very
> sluggish. Any ideas how to work this around?
>
Hi!
After today's testing upgrade of xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.9.1-4
-> 2:2.12.0+shadow-2) 2D performance dropped to hardly usable state.
Page scrolling in Iceweasel and windows movements became very
sluggish. Any ideas how to work this around?
lspci reports "Intel Corporation 82865G Integrat
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:24:40 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> What happens with the Debian kernel currently in unstable?
>
It has 8xx blacklisted from kms, so won't work with that driver.
2.6.32-24 (to be uploaded today) should work though.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 597993 2:2.12.0+shadow-2~noshadow0
Bug #597993 [xserver-xorg-video-intel] xserver-xorg-video-intel: [865GM]
shadowfb makes moving windows way too slow
There is no source info for the package 'xserver-xorg-video-intel' at version
'2:2.12
notfound 597993 2:2.12.0+shadow-2~noshadow0
found597993 2:2.12.0+shadow-1
thanks
Hi,
Rogério Brito (24/09/2010):
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
> Version: 2:2.12.0+shadow-2~noshadow0
please report bugs against versions we actually have in the archive.
> After having upgraded to 2.12.0
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.12.0+shadow-2~noshadow0
Severity: normal
Hi there.
After having upgraded to 2.12.0+shadow-1, I noticed that the shadow
framebuffer makes moving windows very slow (sometimes, up to 1 minute
for moving a single window).
I use an own compiled kernel wi
17 matches
Mail list logo