On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:03:28PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2006-04-29 Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Er, no, that's AC_PATH_XTRA. AC_PATH_X searches for
> > [X11],[X11/Xlib.h],[XrmInitialize ()].
> [...]
> Only in Debian (yet) and only since since autoconf 2.59a-4 (#327655
On 2006-04-29 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.x) you wrote:
[cannot find X]
> > The build-dependencies (which worked before) are: "libx11-dev,
> > libxext-dev, libxpm-dev, xutils, debhelper (>= 4.0.0)" and the
> > autoconf stanza
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.x) you wrote:
> Hi, I need some help or suggestions or something. My package WMRack
> builds fine here--but I haven't yet upgraded to the new "modular" X.
> It fails to build on Debian's autobuilders though, and I'm darned if I
> have any id
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:24:11PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> x_includes and x_libraries now expand to the empty string, biting
> anything that assumed otherwise.
Hi, Aaron, thanks, that's definitely useful information, and I will be
incorporating your patch, but I don't think it addresses the
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I${x_includes}"
> LIBS="$LIBS -L${x_libraries} -lX11"
x_includes and x_libraries now expand to the empty string, biting
anything that assumed otherwise. Accounting for that isn't too hard,
though:
CFLAGS="$CFLAGS ${x_includes:+-I
Hi, I need some help or suggestions or something. My package WMRack
builds fine here--but I haven't yet upgraded to the new "modular" X.
It fails to build on Debian's autobuilders though, and I'm darned if I
have any idea why. I am the sole upstream maintainer of this package
as well as the Debia
6 matches
Mail list logo
