Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-11-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi back, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (19/10/2010): I could push what's currently in experimental as “autobuild-unstable” to get it built against XServer 1.7 and tested by users; and also upload it to experimental so that it gets built against XServer 1.9 as other drivers; this way we get

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-11-09 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:57:48PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hi back, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (19/10/2010): I could push what's currently in experimental as “autobuild-unstable” to get it built against XServer 1.7 and tested by users; and also upload it to experimental so

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-10-24 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 07:31:22PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Julien Viard de Galbert jul...@vdg.blogsite.org (20/10/2010): Well actually the git repos is build using git-svn so I never downloaded a tarball. I think the explanation on how to configure git-svn on a clone from debian's

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-10-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Julien Viard de Galbert jul...@vdg.blogsite.org (20/10/2010): Right, just updated my mailer configuration, should not be in this mail. :) Well actually the git repos is build using git-svn so I never downloaded a tarball. I think the explanation on how to configure git-svn on a clone from

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-10-20 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:43:32PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Julien Viard de Galbert jul...@vdg.blogsite.org (19/10/2010): I am, so no need for next times ;) ACK. But I see: | Mail-Followup-To: Julien Viard de Galbert jul...@vdg.blogsite.org, […] Right, just updated my mailer

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-10-20 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Julien Viard de Galbert wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:43:32PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Well, nothing to say besides it's alright. Did you consider applying for the DM status or for the NM process? Yes, I considered it. But with only one package uploaded and only once, I didn't

RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-10-19 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
Hello X Strike Force ;) Recent message and blog post by Cyril Brulebois reminded me that the openchrome video driver is still waiting for a sponsor. The version in experimental basically have upstream latest svn version. I also added a debug package (this need careful reviewing). As already said

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-10-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Julien! (Not sure you're subscribed, keeping you in Cc just in case.) Julien Viard de Galbert jul...@vdg.blogsite.org (19/10/2010): Recent message and blog post by Cyril Brulebois reminded me that the openchrome video driver is still waiting for a sponsor. Sorry, I missed that, too many

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-10-19 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:23:48PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hi Julien! (Not sure you're subscribed, keeping you in Cc just in case.) I am, so no need for next times ;) Julien Viard de Galbert jul...@vdg.blogsite.org (19/10/2010): Recent message and blog post by Cyril Brulebois

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-10-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Julien Viard de Galbert jul...@vdg.blogsite.org (19/10/2010): I am, so no need for next times ;) ACK. But I see: | Mail-Followup-To: Julien Viard de Galbert jul...@vdg.blogsite.org, […] Alright, will do as soon as I find some time. Thanks. Well, nothing to say besides it's alright. Did

RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1

2010-09-07 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
Hello Julien, I just pushed a new experimental branch for openchrome. This branch is based on the unstable package you just uploaded. I added a debug package as this version in experimental will be used to debug some of the new hardware (I plan to ping open bugs to test the experimental package)