On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:40:09PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> That said, and although I's say that I don't agree with Branden in all
> areas, my impression is that it should possible to work together with
> him, and if the question isn't "Should XFree86 4.3.0 enter unstable
> now?" but instead "Wh
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:38:16AM +1300, Mike Beattie wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:11:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I have felt consistently under pressure to do 2 things:
> >
> > 1) release xfree86 4.3.0-1 to sid ASAP
> > 2) delegate responsibility ASAP
> >
> > Very few actions
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:22:24PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:08:19PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> [...]
> >> I did, however, state that I felt that 4.3.0-1 was by far the superior
> >> base to work from in sid, for a n
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:21:31PM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:04:30 -0500
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This upload was done without advance notice to, or consultation with the
> > rest of the X Strike Force (XSF) team
>
> I asked Branden for clarific
Mike Beattie wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:11:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> I have felt consistently under pressure to do 2 things:
>>
>> 1) release xfree86 4.3.0-1 to sid ASAP
>> 2) delegate responsibility ASAP
>>
>> Very few actions serve both goals at once, so time spent on one i
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:11:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I have felt consistently under pressure to do 2 things:
>
> 1) release xfree86 4.3.0-1 to sid ASAP
> 2) delegate responsibility ASAP
>
> Very few actions serve both goals at once, so time spent on one is,
> obviously, time not sp
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:08:19PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
[...]
>> I did, however, state that I felt that 4.3.0-1 was by far the superior
>> base to work from in sid, for a number of reasons (not least that
>> propagation to sarge would put the XSF
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:08:19PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> [Forgive the crosspost, but I think each paragraph touches on different
> issues, and that all 3 is the best. Please Cc me if you don't reply to
> -x, as that's the only one of these lists I'm on.]
I disagree that your message was ger
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:48:55PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
[...]
> p.s. I've addressed this to you privately so as not to cause any
> troubles in public. If you want, you're welcome to forward this to
> debian-x, or wherever else you like.
David,
I was unable to reply privately; your ISP has
[Forgive the crosspost, but I think each paragraph touches on different
issues, and that all 3 is the best. Please Cc me if you don't reply to
-x, as that's the only one of these lists I'm on.]
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:04:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> FYI, for those who didn't know alrea
Hi Branden,
In your posting about the 4.3 upload you said you welcomed feedback so I
thought I'd drop in my 2 cents from the perspective of an outsider that is
contemplating installing Debian in the near future.
It was my understanding that the way Sid-Testing-Stable can work, is to
visualize it
[Sorry for crossposting; this mail touches on subjects of concern to a
few lists, and I have included my suggestions for followup to individual
lists in this message.]
FYI, for those who didn't know already, an upload identifying itself as
xfree86 4.3.0-1, not authorized by me, was made by Daniel
12 matches
Mail list logo
