FYI, my PC with the misbehaving s3virge is sitting beside me in pieces,
so I can't easily let you know whether XFree86 4.3 fixes the problem for
good. I'm willing to donate the card to someone who is willing and able
to fix the problem, though.
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 10:53, Alan Chandler wrote:
...
I am getting the XFree log message saying AGP not available, yet the messages
in kern.log don't show any problem. I am stuck - where do I look now for
this problem?
...
Just to say that I'm having the same problem, but with:
- Woody
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 15:28, Enzo Alberto Dari wrote:
Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 941M
agpgart: Detected Via Apollo Pro KT400 chipset
agpgart: unable to determine aperture size.
Hi all,
I know I'm a bit late in packaging that module but I've been able to
make it work (again) on my hardware only a few weeks ago.
Now comes the problem: linda complains about
E: xfree86-driver-synaptics; Binary
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/synaptics_drv.o is not stripped.
The binary
On 03 Feb 2004 11:28:33 -0300
Enzo Alberto Dari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Radeon 9200 SE (chip ID: 5964)
It's an AGPx8 device, it won't work properly on 2.4.x kernels, since
they dont have AGPv3 support. Try 2.6.x kernel.
greg
--
Grzegorz Galazka # catch me via Jabber:
RLU #219601 #
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 12:34, Grzegorz Galazka wrote:
On 03 Feb 2004 11:28:33 -0300
Enzo Alberto Dari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Radeon 9200 SE (chip ID: 5964)
It's an AGPx8 device, it won't work properly on 2.4.x kernels, since
they dont have AGPv3 support. Try 2.6.x kernel.
...
OK, I
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:21:31PM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:04:30 -0500
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This upload was done without advance notice to, or consultation with the
rest of the X Strike Force (XSF) team
I asked Branden for clarification on
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:22:24PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:08:19PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
[...]
I did, however, state that I felt that 4.3.0-1 was by far the superior
base to work from in sid, for a number of
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:38:16AM +1300, Mike Beattie wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:11:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I have felt consistently under pressure to do 2 things:
1) release xfree86 4.3.0-1 to sid ASAP
2) delegate responsibility ASAP
Very few actions serve both
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:51:09PM -0700, Thanasis Kinias wrote:
I just found the thread on the VT problems with i830. I've a Radeon
R250 in my laptop and have the same problem. With the generic driver
and 4.2 from Sarge things were fine. I just get no VT switching with
the experimental 4.3
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:12:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I have a problem with launching some X applications like :
enkill:# xchat
xchat: relocation error: /usr/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined symbol:
XRenderQuerySubpixelOrder
enkill:# evolution
evolution: relocation error:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 12:13:59AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Sorry I can't be of much more assistance, I'm no longer a part of the
Debian X Strike Force,
You are as long as you continue to participate in the mailing list. In
fact, you very recently closed a bug against one of the xfree86
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 03:08:09PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 08:58:25PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 11:37:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
They seem to give some hints. Your trace shows the
Your message dated Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:10:50 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#230243: xbase-clients: startx -- :0 uses too large UI fonts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-03 18:27:10 -0500 (Tue, 03 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1001
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Add section heading for 2003 news.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
--- NEWS.xhtml 2004-02-01 19:39:32 UTC (rev 1000)
+++
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-03 18:27:31 -0500 (Tue, 03 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1002
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Add item announcing release of 4.2.1-16.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
--- NEWS.xhtml 2004-02-03 23:27:10 UTC (rev 1001)
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-03 18:37:04 -0500 (Tue, 03 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1003
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Add item describing patch audit completion and where things go from here.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
--- NEWS.xhtml
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-03 18:44:00 -0500 (Tue, 03 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1004
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
Update patch status, and add two SMALL items I forgot for 4.3.0-1, courtesy
of Nathanael Nerode.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 06:27:32PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
+p[29 January] strongXFree86 4.2.1-16 has been accepted into Debian
unstable./strong This is a minor,
+incremental release to resolve an FTBFS (failure-to-build-from-source)
bug on the SPARC
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:47:12PM -0300, Enzo Alberto Dari wrote:
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 12:34, Grzegorz Galazka wrote:
On 03 Feb 2004 11:28:33 -0300
Enzo Alberto Dari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Radeon 9200 SE (chip ID: 5964)
It's an AGPx8 device, it won't work properly on 2.4.x
Package: xterm
Version: 4.2.1-5jds2
Severity: wishlist
The default settings for xterm in /usr/lib/menu/xterm have no options
specified by default. The -sb option places a 50 line scroll bar on the
left side of the terminal thus making it far more useful.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:15:28PM -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote:
Package: xterm
Version: 4.2.1-5jds2
In the future, please don't file bugs with the Debian Bug Tracking
System against packages that the Debian Project does not produce or
distribute.
I have no idea what xterm 4.2.1-5jds2 is. I
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:17:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Um, you seem to have left out
+ 049_remove_duplicate_XShm_prototype.diff
Which does indeed need to be forward-ported (although it turns into a
stolen-from-HEAD patch). (Or maybe it doesn't need to be forward-ported due
to
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:37:39AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:20:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 12:13:59AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Sorry I can't be of much more assistance, I'm no longer a part of the
Debian X Strike Force,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 03:11:11PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
++# define SharedXcursorRev1.0
I believe this should just be 1:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 19
25 matches
Mail list logo
