Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-19 00:39:04 -0500 (Thu, 19 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1066
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Update acknowledgement of Daniel Stone's assist to include sponsor
information, per his request.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
reassign 233659 xfree86
retitle 233659 xfree86: kick MAXCLIENTS up to 512 in Xserver, xfs, lbxproxy
severity 233659 wishlist
thanks
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 02:15:14PM -0500, xavier renaut wrote:
> Package: xlibs
> Version: 4.2.1-11
> Severity: minor
>
> according to
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-18 23:44:38 -0500 (Wed, 18 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1065
Modified:
trunk/debian/NEWS
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Fix missing-word typo.
Modified: trunk/debian/NEWS
===
--- trunk/debian/NEWS 2004-
Package: xlibmesa-dri
Version: 4.3.0-2
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #233582
after installing xlibmesa-dri, Direct rendering is disabled as the driver
for the R128 chipset fails to load. Here is the text displayed when glxinfo
is run iwht verbose debug.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbo
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-16
Severity: normal
The NumPad period is inactive on Brazilian ABNT2 keyboard
The patch is small in order to make it work:
for
/etc/X11/xkb/keycodes/xfree86
*** xfree86.old 2004-02-18 23:11:24.0 -0300
--- xfree86 2004-02-18 23:11:05.0 -0300
*
I notice this bug is tagged moreinfo, unreproducible, but also upstream.
In reviewing this bug, and the ones it is merged with, I don't see where
the moreinfo and unreproducible came from. Unfortunately, it continues
to be very reproducible for me. I've also received no requests for more
info tha
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-2
Severity: normal
For some time I have used the keyboard option "altwin:meta_win", but after
the upgrade to 4.3 I wanted to (try to) live without it again.
With dpkg-reconfigure I could clear the setting in the UI, but the section
wasn't cleared in /var/cac
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:13:35PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:59:26AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > So the person you were emailing was responsible for having the GMX
> > servers blackhole dynamic ranges, was he? Are you also responsible for
> > RoadRunner/Cox/whoe
Accepted:
lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
libdps1_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree
xfree86_4.3.0-2_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
libdps1_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
libice6_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
libice6-dbg_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
libice-dev_4.3.0-2_s390.deb
libsm6_
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-18 18:03:04 -0500 (Wed, 18 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1064
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/woody/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/woody/debian/control
Log:
Apply Norbert Tretkowski's woody backport patch.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/woody/debian/changelog
==
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-18 18:01:37 -0500 (Wed, 18 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1063
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/woody/debian/changelog
Log:
Merge revisions 1049:1055 from trunk.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/woody/debian/changelog
===
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-18 17:50:39 -0500 (Wed, 18 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1062
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/woody/debian/NEWS
branches/4.3.0/woody/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/woody/debian/control
branches/4.3.0/woody/debian/xutils.preinst.in
Log:
Merge changes from 1044 to 1049
The bug no longer exists in 4.3.0-2.
With the same options and only changing
Option "XkbLayout" "el"
to:
Option "XkbLayout" "us,el"
Right alt no longer toggles the kblayout.
Thanks,
Nicos
Discount Cigarettes Store sells only the very finest
quality tobacco, delivered to you factory fresh in the
shortest time possible.
take it:
http://cigaretesstore.com/il/?buret
__
Un_subscr1ber$ go here:
http://ferric:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pizdec.php?S
Package: xlibmesa-dri
Version: 4.3.0-2
First, many thanks to all involved in finally getting XFree86 4.3.0 into
unstable!
Well, DRI is broken after an upgrade from 4.3.0-0pre1v5 to 4.3.0-2.
Downgrading xlibmesa-dri to 4.3.0-0pre1v5 works around this problem.
The following output of glxinfo may b
We offer you the chance to order premium tobacco products at the best prices on
the Internet. As a result, you can purchase your favorite brands of cigarettes
at the
lowest price.
take it:
http://cigaretesstore.com/il/?knudson
__
Un_subscr1ber$ go here:
http://impartation:[E
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-18 16:02:27 -0500 (Wed, 18 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1060
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xdm.config.in
Log:
Fix missing line-continuation character.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
=
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-11
Severity: minor
according to
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree-xpert&m=98630396127386&w=4
the limit could be raised to 512...
i'm currently using tons of xterms in many many virtual desktops.
is there any simple way to raise this limit ?
thanks
-- System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:14:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233185: libxcursor-dev: conflict with xlibs-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Accepted:
lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
libdps1_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree
tag 233225 + moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:11:12PM +0100, Hari Seldon wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-16
>
> Have a GeForce FX Go5200 and I've been told that nv driver works with it.
> Howevere, when I starts X server, it returns an (EE) No devices detected
>
> Us
>From the i386 buildd log:
>The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> groff: Depends: libxaw7 (> 4.1.0) but it is not going to be installed
> Depends: xlibs (> 4.1.0) but it is not going to be installed
> libglide2-dev: Depends: libglide2 but it is not going to be installed
> lib
Branden wrote:
>Here's the new plan.
>
>svn cp trunk branches/4.3.0/sid-branched-properly
>
>[make this branch look like revision 50 of branches/4.3.0/sid]
>
>svn ci
>svn merge -r 50:HEAD branches/4.3.0/sid branches/4.3.0/sid-branched-properly
>svn ci
>svn rm branches/4.3.0/sid branches/4.3.0/sid-b
xfree86_4.3.0-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
libdps1_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
libice6_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
libice6-dbg_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
libice-dev_4.3.0-2_i386.deb
libsm6_
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:59:26AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> So the person you were emailing was responsible for having the GMX
> servers blackhole dynamic ranges, was he? Are you also responsible for
> RoadRunner/Cox/whoever doing the same?
>
> Seriously, get a life.
> > > On Sun, Feb 15, 200
Package: xdm
Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v5
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Hi,
As requested, I am forwarding the old patch again, this time
as a bug report.
Thanks,
manoj
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstabl
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-18 11:33:09 -0500 (Wed, 18 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1059
Removed:
branches/4.3.0/sid-branched-properly/
branches/4.3.0/sid/
Log:
Terminating branches; work completed.
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-18 11:31:44 -0500 (Wed, 18 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1058
Added:
tags/4.3.0-2/
Log:
Tag 4.3.0-2 release.
Copied: tags/4.3.0-2 (from rev 1057, trunk)
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#227217: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226292: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215997: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#216896: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204358: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196058: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#190323: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#185936: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#172550: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#143825: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#128125: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#110974: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#112703: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-18 10:58:24 -0500 (Wed, 18 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1057
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Restore comment item and expand on it.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
--- NEWS.xhtml 2004-02-18 05:43:54 UTC (rev 1056)
++
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#138883: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#179929: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#183300: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184322: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#187365: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#187374: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#199111: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200857: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204358: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209352: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210651: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#212186: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224757: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225408: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225759: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228408: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228810: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Accepted:
lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
xlibs-dbg_4.3.0-2_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says
libdevel.
xlibs-dev_4.3.0-2_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says
libdevel.
xlibs-dev_4.3.0-2_a
xfree86_4.3.0-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xfree86_4.3.0-2.dsc
xfree86_4.3.0-2.diff.gz
lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
libice6_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:28:20 -0500
Source: xfree86
Binary: libx11-6-dbg libxtst6-dbg xserver-common xlibs-static-dev libxp6-dbg
xbase-clients xlibmesa3-dbg libxtrap6-dbg xfonts-75dpi libxt6 libice6-dbg xmh
libxaw6-dbg x-dev libxv1 libx
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
xfree86_4.3.0-2.diff.gz
xfree86_4.3.0-2.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:22:29, the files will be del
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:15:15AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:18:19AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:58:12AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > The X autoconf stuff is not DFSG-free: it's licensed under the X-Oz
> > > license.
> >
> > After Bra
Medical Breakthrough - Stop Aging!
Yes, it's true... HGH is proven to help you:
- Rejunvenate your body and mind
- Drop unwanted fat
- Add lean muscle
- Feel and look younger
- Reduce wrinkles
- Decrease cellutlite
- Restore s/ex drive
- Boost your immune system
- Improve memory, mood and mental
Rejunvenate your body
Yes, it's true... HGH is proven to help you:
- Rejunvenate your body and mind
- Drop unwanted fat
- Add lean muscle
- Feel and look younger
- Reduce wrinkles
- Decrease cellutlite
- Restore s/ex drive
- Boost your immune system
- Improve memory, mood and mental energy
- Slee
15-20 lbs disappear fast!
Yes, it's true... HGH is proven to help you:
- Rejunvenate your body and mind
- Drop unwanted fat
- Add lean muscle
- Feel and look younger
- Reduce wrinkles
- Decrease cellutlite
- Restore s/ex drive
- Boost your immune system
- Improve memory, mood and mental energy
-
Become very strong... easily!
Yes, it's true... HGH is proven to help you:
- Rejunvenate your body and mind
- Drop unwanted fat
- Add lean muscle
- Feel and look younger
- Reduce wrinkles
- Decrease cellutlite
- Restore s/ex drive
- Boost your immune system
- Improve memory, mood and mental energ
Add muscle easily!
Yes, it's true... HGH is proven to help you:
- Rejunvenate your body and mind
- Drop unwanted fat
- Add lean muscle
- Feel and look younger
- Reduce wrinkles
- Decrease cellutlite
- Restore s/ex drive
- Boost your immune system
- Improve memory, mood and mental energy
- Sleep s
Live to be 100!
Yes, it's true... HGH is proven to help you:
- Rejunvenate your body and mind
- Drop unwanted fat
- Add lean muscle
- Feel and look younger
- Reduce wrinkles
- Decrease cellutlite
- Restore s/ex drive
- Boost your immune system
- Improve memory, mood and mental energy
- Sleep soun
Fountain of youth!
Yes, it's true... HGH is proven to help you:
- Rejunvenate your body and mind
- Drop unwanted fat
- Add lean muscle
- Feel and look younger
- Reduce wrinkles
- Decrease cellutlite
- Restore s/ex drive
- Boost your immune system
- Improve memory, mood and mental energy
- Sleep s
Turn back your age!
Yes, it's true... HGH is proven to help you:
- Rejunvenate your body and mind
- Drop unwanted fat
- Add lean muscle
- Feel and look younger
- Reduce wrinkles
- Decrease cellutlite
- Restore s/ex drive
- Boost your immune system
- Improve memory, mood and mental energy
- Sleep
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:18:19AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:58:12AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > The X autoconf stuff is not DFSG-free: it's licensed under the X-Oz
> > license.
>
> After Branden's mail to -legal, I'm going to definitely agree. This, of
> course b
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:18:19AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> I'm going
> to try and look in to what other distros do to configure X to see where
> we're going. If anyone wants to contribute to that, feel free. The basic
> idea being that if we can steal some autoconfiguration code it'll save
>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:18:19AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:58:12AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > The X autoconf stuff is not DFSG-free: it's licensed under the X-Oz
> > license.
>
> After Branden's mail to -legal, I'm going to definitely agree. This, of
> course b
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:17:29AM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
> There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
> override file for the following file(s):
>
> xlibs-dbg_4.3.0-1_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says
> libdevel.
> xlibs-dev_4.3.0-1_all.deb:
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-18 00:43:54 -0500 (Wed, 18 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1056
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Sigh. Put news item on "hold" while 4.3.0-2 builds for the stupidest
possible reason.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
--- N
79 matches
Mail list logo