Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:19:52 +0100
with message-id 4ba85d88.4010...@ens-lyon.org
and subject line Re: Bug#575047: Xserver Displays Black White Vertical Bars
has caused the Debian Bug report #575047,
regarding Xserver Displays Black White Vertical Bars
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 575047 xserver-xorg-video-radeon 1:6.9.0-1+lenny4
Bug #575047 [xorg (radeon)] Xserver Displays Black White Vertical Bars
Warning: Unknown package 'radeon'
Bug reassigned from package 'xorg (radeon)' to 'xserver-xorg-video-radeon'.
Bug No
NEWS | 30
configure.ac |2
man/intel.man | 34 ++
src/drmmode_display.c |2
src/i830_driver.c |2
src/i830_render.c | 67 +++-
src/i830_uxa.c| 29
ChangeLog | 114
NEWS | 30
configure.ac |2
debian/changelog | 21
debian/control|2
man/intel.man | 34 ++
src/drmmode_display.c |2
Tag 'xserver-xorg-video-intel-2_2.10.903-1' created by Brice Goglin
bgog...@debian.org at 2010-03-23 06:44 +
Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.10.903-1 to experimental.
Changes since xserver-xorg-video-intel-2_2.10.902-1:
Brice Goglin (6):
Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.4
xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.10.903-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.10.903-1.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.10.903.orig.tar.gz
xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.10.903-1.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.10.903-1_i386.deb
Accepted:
xserver-xorg-video-intel-dbg_2.10.903-1_i386.deb
to
main/x/xserver-xorg-video-intel/xserver-xorg-video-intel-dbg_2.10.903-1_i386.deb
xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.10.903-1.diff.gz
to main/x/xserver-xorg-video-intel/xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.10.903-1.diff.gz
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.9.1-2
Severity: normal
After coming out of hibernate, the X server goes a resolution of
2128x800 as displayed by xdpyinfo:
screen #0:
dimensions:2128x800 pixels (563x212 millimeters)
resolution:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon
Version: 1:6.12.6-1
Severity: important
I have tried the Ubuntu live disk and X works there. So it could not be a
faulty card.
I have swapped out RAM's and it still doesn't work.
I can't find any similar bugs so would somebody please help me. I can't work
Hans Liao wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon
Version: 1:6.12.6-1
Severity: important
I have tried the Ubuntu live disk and X works there. So it could not be a
faulty card.
I have swapped out RAM's and it still doesn't work.
I can't find any similar bugs so would somebody please
Hans Liao wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.5+3
Severity: important
My X decides to stop working. I have tried the Ubuntu live disk and X works
there.
I have ruled out RAM or display card issues.
Please would somebody help me.
Looks like you reported the same bug twice ?
Brice Goglin wrote:
Can you send the output of xrandr instead ? I wonder if the driver could
be improperly detecting the status of some outputs and thus enabling two
outputs inside a large 2128x800 screen.
Hibernate didn't do, but after a reboot it came up in silly mode.
Xrandr then showed:
block 568168 by 568162
thanks
Now that the drm parts from 2.6.33 have been backported to the Debian
2.6.32 kernel, packaging xserver-xorg-video-nouveau seems to be
desirable, but that needs a fixed libdrm which includes the nouveau
parts.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 568168 by 568162
Bug #568168 [xserver-xorg-video-nouveau] xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: fails to
build with X server 1.7
Bug #573294 [xserver-xorg-video-nouveau] can't install on powerpc
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 13:30:03 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
block 568168 by 568162
thanks
Now that the drm parts from 2.6.33 have been backported to the Debian
2.6.32 kernel, packaging xserver-xorg-video-nouveau seems to be
desirable, but that needs a fixed libdrm which includes the
On 2010-03-23 13:51 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 13:30:03 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
block 568168 by 568162
thanks
Now that the drm parts from 2.6.33 have been backported to the Debian
2.6.32 kernel, packaging xserver-xorg-video-nouveau seems to be
desirable, but
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 14:02:19 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-03-23 13:51 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
No, it needs somebody who'd take care of packaging a suitable nouveau
X driver.
I had just begun to tackle that task, using the ubuntu branch from
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau git
Hi,
Joe Hill joeh...@teksavvy.com (21/03/2010):
Package: compiz-plugins
Version: 0.8.2-6
Severity: normal
that'd be compiz-fusion-plugins-main instead, but well.
Expo does not work, and cannot be enabled. When I open compizconfig
I assume you mean ccsm?
and try to check the Expo plugin
Sven Joachim wrote:
So? My attempt to build xserver-xorg-video-nouveau was shortcut here:
,
| checking if DPMSExtension is defined... yes
| checking for LIBDRM_NOUVEAU... configure: error: Package requirements
(libdrm_nouveau) were not met:
|
| No package 'libdrm_nouveau' found
|
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:24:19 +0100
with message-id 20100323142419.gh18...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#574902: compiz-plugins: Expo not working, cannot be
checked
has caused the Debian Bug report #574902,
regarding compiz-plugins: Expo not working, cannot be checked
to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 428556 1:2.1.17-1
Bug #428556 [xserver-xorg-video-nv] Pressing Fn-CRT/LCD garbles display
Bug Marked as found in versions xserver-xorg-video-nv/1:2.1.17-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
found 428556 1:2.1.17-1
thanks
I tried the latest version, and it still happens. I understand this is
a wontfix bug, but thought I'd keep version info updated.
Anyone know if there is any way to switch between CRT/LCD _without_
using the VBIOS hot-key?
/Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:43:28 +0100, Fathi Boudra f...@debian.org wrote:
dmesg shows 7MB stolen ram
change this in the bios under video settings to at least 32MB
Max allowed shared/stolen ram is best
But I think that 7M is not enough
anyway, changing video ram is easy enough to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 568162 + patch
Bug #568162 [libdrm-dev] Please add Nouveau related parts
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
xorg-server_1.7.6-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-server_1.7.6-1.dsc
xorg-server_1.7.6.orig.tar.gz
xorg-server_1.7.6-1.diff.gz
xserver-common_1.7.6-1_all.deb
xserver-xorg-core_1.7.6-1_amd64.deb
xserver-xorg-core-udeb_1.7.6-1_amd64.udeb
Sven Joachim wrote:
tags 568162 + patch
thanks
Attached is a patch for this bug, adapted from the current Ubuntu libdrm
package. It is created with git-format-patch --stdout, I chose that
format over sending the (only two) commit patches individually to avoid
subject mangling by the BTS.
Dnia wtorek, 23 marca 2010 o 20:39:57 napisałeś:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: normal
After a recent aptitude upgrade, my desktop is suddenly very slow. For
example, there is no smooth scrolling in Firefox. I am not sure which
upgrade did it, but am
debian/changelog |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit da679bc5497638b169f90755dfdd480af73c45d3
Author: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Date: Tue Mar 23 21:29:39 2010 +0100
Upload to unstable.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.7.6-1' created by Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org at
2010-03-23 20:29 +
Tagging upload of xorg-server 2:1.7.6-1 to unstable.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAkupJLsACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd26iQCgv/X0rbKGMwLpvp78XQQhGqZH
On 2010-03-23 21:39 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
I'd like to know which upstream commits are reverted by
03_revert_abi_change.diff. Do you by chance know that?
Commit b496c63143e9a4ca02011582329bce2df99d9b7c and its successor are
reverted by the patch.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2010-03-23 14:14 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 14:02:19 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
I had just begun to tackle that task, using the ubuntu branch from
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau git as a starting point.
Oh, cool. Thanks for doing this.
I have some good news, since
Hi.
Thue Janus Kristensen thu...@gmail.com (23/03/2010):
After a recent aptitude upgrade, my desktop is suddenly very
slow. For example, there is no smooth scrolling in Firefox. I am not
sure which upgrade did it, but am filing a bug here as my best
guess.
AFAICT -radeonhd isn't really
Wolfgang Becker u...@gmx.de (22/03/2010):
Setting the duration of the beep produced by system bell using xset
b 50 100 10 no longer works. The duration as well as the pitch
^^^
setting is ignored.
Hi,
do you happen to know which version was working fine before it
Hi,
d...@suremail.info d...@suremail.info (21/03/2010):
I had it working with lenny:
ii xorg 1:7.3+20
But not working (freeze VT, cannot kill X) with testing:
ii xorg 1:7.5+3
Thus I guess the big change between 7.3 and 7.5
Accepted:
xdmx-tools_1.7.6-1_amd64.deb
to main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.7.6-1_amd64.deb
xdmx_1.7.6-1_amd64.deb
to main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.7.6-1_amd64.deb
xnest_1.7.6-1_amd64.deb
to main/x/xorg-server/xnest_1.7.6-1_amd64.deb
xorg-server_1.7.6-1.diff.gz
to
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:55:31 +
with message-id e1nuc4r-0003y4...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#574354: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.7.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #574354,
regarding xserver-xorg-core: new upstream version 1.7.6
to be marked as done.
This means that
ChangeLog | 448
++
Xext/Makefile.am |4
Xext/xselinux.c| 131
--
Xext/xselinux.h
debian/changelog |1 +
debian/control |7 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 25680a5a25ec48e3df35c176e00b094135fb43ee
Author: Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@cc.hut.fi
Date: Wed Mar 24 00:07:00 2010 +0200
control: Relax/drop some build-deps
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Hi.
Thue Janus Kristensen thu...@gmail.com (23/03/2010):
After a recent aptitude upgrade, my desktop is suddenly very
slow. For example, there is no smooth scrolling in Firefox. I am not
sure which upgrade did it,
compiz-fusion-plugins-main_0.8.4-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
compiz-fusion-plugins-main_0.8.4-2.dsc
compiz-fusion-plugins-main_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
compiz-fusion-plugins-main_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on
Accepted:
compiz-fusion-plugins-main_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
to
main/c/compiz-fusion-plugins-main/compiz-fusion-plugins-main_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
compiz-fusion-plugins-main_0.8.4-2.dsc
to main/c/compiz-fusion-plugins-main/compiz-fusion-plugins-main_0.8.4-2.dsc
Tag 'compiz-fusion-plugins-main-0.8.4-2' created by Cyril Brulebois
k...@debian.org at 2010-03-23 23:22 +
Tagging upload of compiz-fusion-plugins-main 0.8.4-2 to unstable.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
debian/changelog | 11 +++
debian/control |4 +++-
debian/rules |7 ++-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit b1e746e84b795fca847b1f80f071725f19cfbd63
Author: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Date: Wed Mar 24 00:12:36 2010 +0100
Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:42:56 +0100
with message-id 20100323234256.ga1...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#573095: compiz-fusion-plugins-main is too updated in
sqeeze thus plugins cant be started
has caused the Debian Bug report #573095,
regarding compiz-fusion-plugins-main is
compiz-fusion-plugins-extra_0.8.4-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
compiz-fusion-plugins-extra_0.8.4-2.dsc
compiz-fusion-plugins-extra_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
compiz-fusion-plugins-extra_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running
Accepted:
compiz-fusion-plugins-extra_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
to
main/c/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
compiz-fusion-plugins-extra_0.8.4-2.dsc
to main/c/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra_0.8.4-2.dsc
debian/changelog | 11 +++
debian/control |4 +++-
debian/rules |7 ++-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 983232c157c5e3c572a0b4dd1b9871ffb6d37b65
Author: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Date: Wed Mar 24 00:45:10 2010 +0100
Tag 'compiz-fusion-plugins-extra-0.8.4-2' created by Cyril Brulebois
k...@debian.org at 2010-03-23 23:50 +
Tagging upload of compiz-fusion-plugins-extra 0.8.4-2 to unstable.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
I'm a bit unsure it's needed to handle this bug though
What do you mean ?
I just tried this one:
deb http://snapshot-dev.debian.org/archive/debian/20091201T035027Z sid main
which get this version:
ii xorg 1:7.4+4
And it also freezed VT with both nv and
compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported_0.8.4-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported_0.8.4-3.dsc
compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported_0.8.4-3.diff.gz
compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported_0.8.4-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your
Accepted:
compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported_0.8.4-3.diff.gz
to
main/c/compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported/compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported_0.8.4-3.diff.gz
compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported_0.8.4-3.dsc
to
main/c/compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported/compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported_0.8.4-3.dsc
debian/changelog | 11 +++
debian/control |4 +++-
debian/rules |7 ++-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit bc6dab79730a4d49b9b1e8f8f3bcf52df97000a6
Author: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Date: Wed Mar 24 01:19:31 2010 +0100
Tag 'compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported-0.8.4-3' created by Cyril Brulebois
k...@debian.org at 2010-03-24 00:25 +
Tagging upload of compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported 0.8.4-3 to unstable.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:37:38 +0100
with message-id 20100324003738.ga5...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#573012: compiz: recurring problem
has caused the Debian Bug report #573012,
regarding compiz-plugins: Some plugins do not work anymore
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:45:29 +0100
with message-id 20100324004529.ga5...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#573528: compiz
has caused the Debian Bug report #573528,
regarding wrong ABI for core plugin
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/control |1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 9008c9ad515b4e9560228a91a1384c7f515298f1
Author: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Date: Wed Mar 24 01:52:55 2010 +0100
Add Homepage field.
diff --git a/debian/changelog
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/control |1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 25563043d33ddc588502636e047d9c4b2eaa592a
Author: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Date: Wed Mar 24 01:52:55 2010 +0100
Add Homepage field.
diff --git a/debian/changelog
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/control |1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 0388b64c168eebb2baf3d0cf134877c094a713d8
Author: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Date: Wed Mar 24 01:52:56 2010 +0100
Add Homepage field.
diff --git a/debian/changelog
Thanks Brice.
I didn't know which package I should report it on so I took the two
obvious one to blame :P .
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi Brice,
I didn't change anything from what I can remember. I upgraded yesterday
afternoon, and my computer lost X this morning.
I have no idea how to do the gdb.
I did try removing all of X and reinstall the unstable version of it,
still gave me the same crash.
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Heya again.
Thue Janus Kristensen thu...@gmail.com (23/03/2010):
Yes, fair enough. But with -radeon dual screen doesn't work in KDE :(.
So I thought I would mention it anyway, on the off chance that it
would get fixed :). But as I said, fair enough if you don't give it
priority.
For
Hi,
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de (23/03/2010):
I have some good news, since (after fixing #568162) I indeed managed
to build a working package. At least X has been running for about
two hours which is a promising start. :-)
I'd like to echo Julien's thanks. BTW: Do you plan to maintain
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 555474 http://www.openchrome.org/trac/ticket/340
Bug #555474 [kdelibs-bin] /usr/bin/kdeinit4: Login fails with kdeinit4 fatal IO
error
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://www.openchrome.org/trac/ticket/340'.
reassign 555474
debian/changelog |6
debian/patches/110_findglyphbyhash-fix.patch | 35 +++
debian/patches/series|1
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit c8614f81c2fc8985b83b7084a6ffe7e08ad4fefc
Author:
64 matches
Mail list logo
