Hi Joey,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 14:10:01 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
The latter choice would be too complicated if the font package ships more
than one alias file. So, I take the former.
debhelper patch looks cleaner, and I hope the added options are OK
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:04:01AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I think I've fixed this, I put a package up for testing at
http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/xfonts-utils_7.5+1~thep1.dsc
I haven't tested that this works properly, and I don't know when I can
do that, so any help would be
tag 543512 pending
kthxbye
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 13:04:41 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
With those changes I think this is ready.
Pushed:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/font/xfonts-utils.git;a=commit;h=6c9954c869ef8960790cfcb63a30200c0390689f
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 543512 pending
Bug #543512 [xfonts-utils] update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts
Added tag(s) pending.
kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 22:21:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Your patch makes us ship /var/lib/xfonts/excluded-aliases in the
package, so AFAICT it will replace the local version on each
xfonts-utils upgrade, which is not what we want. I'll change this to
create the file in postinst if it
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 09:54:06 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
... and now I wonder if the foo.alias files really need to stay in /etc,
or if we can move them somewhere else where they'll be removed with the
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:00:54 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
Index: xfonts-utils-7.4+2.1/debian/local/update-fonts-alias
===
--- xfonts-utils-7.4+2.1.orig/debian/local/update-fonts-alias 2009-09-02
22:11:23.0
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:00:54 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
+INCLUDE_ALIAS=
+EXCLUDE_ALIAS=
+EXCLUDE_CONF=/etc/fonts/excluded-aliases
Should this one be somewhere in /etc/X11 instead? /etc/fonts has the
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
The latter choice would be too complicated if the font package ships more
than one alias file. So, I take the former.
debhelper patch looks cleaner, and I hope the added options are OK for
xfonts-utils.
This patch is fine by me for debhelper; of course I
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:42:08PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
+ push @alias_postinst, \tsed -i
\',/etc/X11/fonts/$f/$package.alias,d\' $alias_exclude;
+ push @alias_postrm, \tsed -i
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:16:02AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
Exclude list, probably:
- /etc/fonts/excluded-aliases lists *.alias files to be excluded.
- Patch update-fonts-alias to filter out the exclude list.
- Patch dh_installxfonts so that:
- package.postrm adds its
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
+ push @alias_postinst, \tsed -i
\',/etc/X11/fonts/$f/$package.alias,d\' $alias_exclude;
+ push @alias_postrm, \tsed -i
\',/etc/X11/fonts/$f/$package.alias,d\' $alias_exclude;
I have a
tags 543512 + patch
thanks
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:13:52PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:55:04PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Alternatively, have it take a list of the font files that are
going to be removed, and update the file to remove them; then it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 543512 + patch
Bug #543512 [xfonts-utils] update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 22:43:44 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:13:52PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:55:04PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Alternatively, have it take a list of the font files that are
going to be
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Julien Cristaujcris...@debian.org wrote:
update-fonts-* shouldn't need to know about dpkg, IMO. Any way we can
avoid this?
Exclude list, probably:
- /etc/fonts/excluded-aliases lists *.alias files to be excluded.
- Patch update-fonts-alias to filter out the
16 matches
Mail list logo
