Re: packages that need an epoch in Ubuntu

2007-02-18 Thread David Nusinow
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:56:21PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, David Nusinow wrote: > > >Hi Timo, > > Hi David, > > >That's fine by me, please send us patches to the list. > > Great, I'll send them later! I think Julien has already incremented the epochs for you guys in

Re: packages that need an epoch in Ubuntu

2007-02-17 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, David Nusinow wrote: Hi Timo, Hi David, That's fine by me, please send us patches to the list. Great, I'll send them later! Does this mean that Ubuntu has an actual X maintainance team now? Who's on this team aside from yourself? Also, would you please start sending

Re: packages that need an epoch in Ubuntu

2007-02-16 Thread David Nusinow
Hi Timo, On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:18:31PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > > Hi! > > The Ubuntu X SWAT team has now begun uploading X.org 7.2 to Feisty, and > it came up that there are some packages which have for historical reasons > needed an epoch compared to the Debian package. Thes

packages that need an epoch in Ubuntu

2007-02-16 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hi! The Ubuntu X SWAT team has now begun uploading X.org 7.2 to Feisty, and it came up that there are some packages which have for historical reasons needed an epoch compared to the Debian package. These are (from the ones that were updated for 7.2, there could be others): libice