[Declude.JunkMail] v1.33 Still Has Problem with Large 'All Receipients' List

2002-01-16 Thread E Perrine
A customer attempted to send a mailing with more than 500 persons in the 'bcc' field. I was adding the 'All Recipients' X-Note to the header. Their mail was being corrupted with the list spilling over into the subject line and the body of the message. On removing the X-Note, their mail went

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] v1.33 Still Has Problem with Large 'AllReceipients' List

2002-01-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
A customer attempted to send a mailing with more than 500 persons in the 'bcc' field. I was adding the 'All Recipients' X-Note to the header. Their mail was being corrupted with the list spilling over into the subject line and the body of the message. This problem has been identified, and

[Declude.JunkMail] MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:X-RBL-Warning: Domain videoage1.com has no MX/A records.

2002-01-16 Thread Paul
Is there any way to block emails from a domain with no MX or A records? From email headers: X-RBL-Warning: Domain videoage1.com has no MX/A records. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain videoage1.com has no MX/A records.

2002-01-16 Thread Andy Schmidt
MAILFROM Test --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] v1.33 Still Has Problem with Large 'All Receipients' List

2002-01-16 Thread Larry J. Burton
Scott, We've encountered the same problem. If you could please provide an interim release for us, I'd appreciate. Thanks, Larry Larry J. Burton Solution Partners Group, Ltd. 2155 South Valley Highway Suite 206 Denver, Colorado 80222 Phone: 303-300-3420 Fax: 303-300-3418 E-Mail: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] v1.33 Still Has Problem with Large 'All Receipients' List

2002-01-16 Thread E Perrine
While I generally agree, I have been less than thrilled with Imail's list server. Further, we have some customers for whom even the basics of list administration prove to be more than they can handle. Finally, in this particular case we didn't know about their activities 'til this message blew up

[Declude.JunkMail] Full Manual with all Declude options defined

2002-01-16 Thread Michael Hardrick
Greetings, I would like to know if there is a full manual that defines all the options available with declude... esp the config files. I'm really interested in the weight system and customizing it to my ISP's needs. Are these weights preset and can I turn off, add, increase weights for each

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] v1.33 Still Has Problem with Large 'All Receipients' List

2002-01-16 Thread Charles Frolick
I've heard of problems with Imail's List server before. I don't run any lists, I just direct them to services like Yahoo Groups or something more robust like Topica if they need a hefty list. Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Full Manual with all Declude optionsdefined

2002-01-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
I would like to know if there is a full manual that defines all the options available with declude... http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manaul.htm . esp the config files. I'm really interested in the weight system and customizing it to my ISP's needs. Are these weights preset and can I turn

[Declude.JunkMail] X-Note With All Tests? (And Several Other Questions)

2002-01-16 Thread E Perrine
* Is there a header option that will list the results of all tests? This would make analysis of the weight tests a lot easier. * In what order are tests executed? I could imagine several options: global.cfg order, user.junkmail order, hardcoded order, etc. * What determines the test

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sequence of Tests?

2002-01-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
They are executed in the order that they are defined in the global.cfg file. But - does the order make any difference to the action taken? Aside from the SUBJECT action (where only one subject modification is made), it should not make a difference. Are their ways to optimize the order to

DSN:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sequence of Tests?

2002-01-16 Thread smb
Is it a correct assumption that if 4 weight tests are defined (weight5, weight10, weight15, weight20) and the total weight is 18 only the weight15 test would get triped. Stu And, obviously, the WEIGHT test must somehow be postponed - because if it was at the beginning of the globa.cfg file it

Re: DSN:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sequence of Tests?

2002-01-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it a correct assumption that if 4 weight tests are defined (weight5, weight10, weight15, weight20) and the total weight is 18 only the weight15 test would get triped. No. If the total weight is 18, the WEIGHT5 test, WEIGHT10 test and WEIGHT15 tests will all get triggered.

Re: DSN:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sequence of Tests?

2002-01-16 Thread smb
As usual when I assume something I am wrong :) Stu At 02:39 PM 01/16/2002 -0500, you wrote: Is it a correct assumption that if 4 weight tests are defined (weight5, weight10, weight15, weight20) and the total weight is 18 only the weight15 test would get triped. No. If the total weight is 18,

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist problems

2002-01-16 Thread Michael Ernst
Can anyone tell me why the following message was not Whitelisted (one of many)? Seems to be an exact match for text and case. Using JunkMail Standard Beta 1.31 and our Global.cfg contains the following Whitelist entry: WHITELIST FROM@nytimes.com Received: from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist problems

2002-01-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
Can anyone tell me why the following message was not Whitelisted (one of many)? Seems to be an exact match for text and case. Using JunkMail Standard Beta 1.31 and our Global.cfg contains the following Whitelist entry: WHITELIST FROM@nytimes.com Most likely, it had a return address

RE: DSN:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sequence of Tests?

2002-01-16 Thread David Stavert
In future you might want to assume you are wrong BEFORE you ask the question. ;) David As usual when I assume something I am wrong :) Stu At 02:39 PM 01/16/2002 -0500, you wrote: Is it a correct assumption that if 4 weight tests are defined (weight5, weight10, weight15, weight20) and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:X-RBL-Warning: Domain videoage1.com has no MX/A records.

2002-01-16 Thread Paul
Actually, I mean a test to see if there is an MX or A record, not a test against a specific domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:X-RBL-Warning:Domain videoage1.com has no MX/A records.

2002-01-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
Actually, I mean a test to see if there is an MX or A record, not a test against a specific domain. The MAILFROM test checks the return address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and makes sure that the domain name has an MX or A record (meaning in this case that mail could be delivered to the @example.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist problems

2002-01-16 Thread Michael Ernst
Hi Scott, If the return address is the same as Reply-To (in this case @TIMES - Inside NYTimes.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] - see header include with original message) I'm assuming that we're looking at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thus, @nytimes.com should work. From: Michael Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: