Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Simple Warning?

2002-05-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
I am trying to simply set a rule in Outlook that looks for a special text to sort the e-Mails that have failed. Currently with the basic configuration the warning lists the tests that have failed so I am to filter the failed ones I have to search for the text associated with all tests

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogging Down Totally

2002-05-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have seen a reference either on this list or documentation somewhere that there is a queing function or addon software for Declude? Is this for when the server gets totally bogged down and almost not responding under a heavy load. It's called Declude Queue, and is part of all the Declude

IPWHOIS:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.51 (beta) released

2002-05-01 Thread David Roush
Hey Scott, Does this mean that if a virus sends itself out through a mailing list, the virus will not be stopped on the way out? David Roush Technical Services Director Diocese of Austin 512-476-1009, ext. 237 512-469-9537, fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.51 (beta) released

2002-05-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
Does this mean that if a virus sends itself out through a mailing list, the virus will not be stopped on the way out? It will get caught (on the way in, instead of on the way out). If you have a mailing list with 10,000 users on it, and someone sends an E-mail to the list, Declude only needs

IPWHOIS:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.51 (beta) released

2002-05-01 Thread David Roush
That is great Scott. Thanks, David Roush Technical Services Director Diocese of Austin 512-476-1009, ext. 237 512-469-9537, fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] hotmail !?

2002-05-01 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Nothing like posting on your own post. Also seems atleast one AOL server and one prodidgy server also been OSSRC listed. Got a chunk of legit mail that was caught this morning and tonight thanks to OSSRC. Guess I really need to go all the way with the weighted system consider I'm using a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] hotmail !?

2002-05-01 Thread Andy Schmidt
Actually - you need to disable OSSRC for now. SPEWS has an error in their database instead of listing 64.x.x.x to 64.x.y.z - they accidentally omitted the second 6 - so currently their database is blocking: 64.x.x.x to 4.x.y.z Of course, just like Spammers, SPEWS does NOT provide true contact

[Declude.JunkMail] One more novice question...

2002-05-01 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi; Is it correct to assume that this statement on the manual: - First, you need to create a text file that lists one address or domain per line, followed by the reason for blocking it. For example, @example.com This domain sends spam. or [EMAIL PROTECTED] This guy was mailbombing us.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] One more novice question...

2002-05-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
If I list: Example.com It would include: [EMAIL PROTECTED] But NOT: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No, it would include both. Anything with Example.com appearing in it would get caught. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] One more novice question...

2002-05-01 Thread Madscientist
Try .postmasterdirect.com Including the leading dot ensures you're not getting other domains. Maybe also @postmaster.com for when that gets tried. _M | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan | Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] One more novice question...

2002-05-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
So for us to block these people in general we have to put: postmasterdirect.com In the blacklist. But then this will block another organization if they come with a legitimate business that has the domain: Our-Postmasterdirect.com If you're concerned that a legitimate business will appear

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH

2002-05-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
Will the SPAMATTACH.eml accept the %RECIPHOST% varible for the sendto address?? You could do that, but that would only affect what appears in the headers. The E-mail will still get delivered to the original recipient. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH

2002-05-01 Thread David
Even replacing the To: %ALLRECIPS% with To: postmaster@%RECIPHOST% will only affect the headers. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH

2002-05-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
Even replacing the To: %ALLRECIPS% with To: postmaster@%RECIPHOST% will only affect the headers. That is correct. Declude will not alter the recipient of the E-mail, or even look at the To: header in the spamattach.eml file. Note that if you do go with the %RECIPHOST%, you should use To: