Please excuse my ignorance... I have found everything I need.
Thanks,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Junkmail
I get this email that say that it was sent from myself to myself. However I see some
other interesting things in the header. What
can I use in this header to keep this from happening again?
Received: from $domain [80.16.228.101] by mail.nfti.com
(SMTPD32-6.06) id AB048501B4; Thu, 27 Jun 2002
I get this email that say that it was sent from myself to myself. However
I see some other interesting things in the header. What
can I use in this header to keep this from happening again?
Received: from $domain [80.16.228.101] by mail.nfti.com
(SMTPD32-6.06) id AB048501B4; Thu, 27 Jun
What is the HELOBOGUS test? I've not seen that one.
That's in the latest beta version, and detects bogus HELO/EHLO data (for
example, if a server sends HELO $domain or EHLO i.am.a.spammer).
You say that the spam headers would detect... why didn't it?
Because I forgot to mention that only the
Do you have WHITELISTTO postmaster?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Foulks
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself
What is the HELOBOGUS test? I've not
Thanks Scott
When will this beta release move to production code?
Greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself
No but I do WHITELIST my domain..
greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Stavert
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself
Do you have WHITELISTTO
When will this beta release move to production code?
I don't know.
It could be within the next few weeks, or it could take a month or so
(mostly depending on what new features we may decide to add). My guess is
closer to the few weeks side, as the new filtering ability has been
requested
I guess what I am asking is...
Is the beta stable enough now to take care of this $domain issue... I've been getting
way too many of these.
or
Should I wait until the release is gold?
What do you think?
Greg
BTW- If I move to the newer (beta) version. What becomes of my current
The beta works great! The new word filtering works even better!
save your old version and try the new one, its just a matter of copying
files
Have a great day!
Rick Davidson
Buckeye Internet Services
www.buckeyeweb.com
440-953-1900
-
- Original Message -
From: Greg Foulks [EMAIL
Scott
Would the WHITELIST nfti.com be cause for this to NOT fail no mater what.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Foulks
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed
Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta? What are the reasons to use
it over 1.53?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself
The beta
Thanks, Rick. So to clarify, the difference between 1.53 and 1.55 are these
additional filters?
Sorry if you've answered this previously, I just joined the list.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:15 PM
Would the WHITELIST nfti.com be cause for this to NOT fail no mater what.
Yes. If you have WHITELIST FROM nfti.com, all E-mail sent with an
nfti.com return address will go through without failing any spam
tests. That's one of the reasons why whitelists are used as a last resort,
to
yes the additional filtering capabilities were added. We have had incredible
success with the word filters and weighting system. People started calling
to thank us because the SPAM has virtually disappeared
Have a great day!
Rick Davidson
Buckeye Internet Services
www.buckeyeweb.com
440-953-1900
This is where I shop for new features:
http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darin T. Cox
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is there a feature list for the JunkMail
Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta?
http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm
What are the reasons to use it over 1.53?
The new features. :)
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
would you mind share your filtering setup ?
Would be very interesting see how you got it setup and what filtering
phrases your using.
Thursday, June 27, 2002, 14:35:53 PM, you wrote:
RD yes the additional filtering capabilities were added. We have had incredible
RD success with the word filters
Scott,
I cannot get the any of the tests to trigger with the rsp set off testname
feature. I have tried several mailers, all sending text and am case
sensitive aware. I have a client who wants fancy responses sent and I need
to test them first.
I am using ver 1.55 Suggestions?
Have a great day!
here is my word filter file, sorry I had to zip it or it wouldnt have made
it :-]
Its amazing how effective the phrase filter is when targeting their SPAM
excuses...
Have a great day!
Rick Davidson
Buckeye Internet Services
www.buckeyeweb.com
440-953-1900
-
wordfilter.zip
Description: Zip
Thanks, Scott...didn't see that page...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself
Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta?
just wanted to add that we hold at a weight of 14 and have virtually no
false positives
Have a great day!
Rick Davidson
Buckeye Internet Services
www.buckeyeweb.com
440-953-1900
-
- Original Message -
From: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27,
The main problem we're seeing is false positives on SPAMHEADERS, BADHEADERS...
Just a reminder here --
Although the SPAMHEADERS test will have quite a few false positives (mainly
from poorly designed websites, but the false positives go down a lot by
using the new LOOSENSPAMHEADERS ON
what exactly is WEIGHT10? we have lots of legit emails what is being held by this.
Should I just set PERCENT to WARN?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an
Now I noticed that my emails from hotmail are not getting through. I can't
figure out why. The declude log says that match the
BlackHoleSender list but the address I am sending from is not in the
BlackHole.
Let me guess, you've told Declude to look for any return address with
mail.com in it?
Rick, would you mind providing the details of your
tests and weights? Itried HOLDING on weight30 for a couple days,
reviewing with SpamReview to see what comes through. It wasaround
8000 per day. None were legit, so I'm deleting those now. On
Weight20 I get between 20,000 and 26,000 per
damn your good!
I just added a list of new domains and addresses to block from a posting on this list.
I found it deep in the middle a domain was
being blocked mail.com I added a @ so it now reads @mail.com
Works fine now. Let this be a lesson to us all. Use the block lists at your own risks!
Here are a couple of emails we received that were flagged with BADHEADERs
but are valid subscriptions...anything appear out of order?
Received: from mail.yourdictionary.com [206.14.214.45] by vwc.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id
Dear Glenn,
A question here on the word filter.
Say if I have
BODY 5 CONTAINS viagra
in my word filter text if the message contains the word viagra 5 times
in it will it get an total weight of 25 due to word filter or will it
just get a weight of 5 ?
If the prior then people should be VERY
Oooo, sorry, I really don't know anything about how
the new word filters work. Haven't tried them. But I would guess the
weight would be 5, that it doesn't multiply based on how many times the word
occurs.
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
From:
Eje
Gustafsson
To: Glenn
Here are a couple of emails we received that were flagged with BADHEADERs
but are valid subscriptions...anything appear out of order?
Before looking at it, I can say Yes, something is out of order. :)
Received: from mail.yourdictionary.com [206.14.214.45] by vwc.net with ESMTP
Interesting...thanks, Scott.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there a feature list for the JunkMail
beta? Fw: [Declude.JunkMail] New filter test
Here are a
A question here on the word filter.
Say if I have
BODY 5 CONTAINS viagra
in my word filter text if the message contains the word viagra 5 times
in it will it get an total weight of 25 due to word filter or will it
just get a weight of 5 ?
No. Only the first instance will be counted.
Thank you.
Then I can safetly turn back on my delete but for now until I got a
good set of word filters that I can sleep good with I think I will put
the delete on WEIGHT40 and hold the WEIGHT30 for now.
Thursday, June 27, 2002, 16:10:05 PM, you wrote:
A question here on the word filter.
Say
It takes alot of experimentation to get the weighting right and as I
mentioned 14 was where it worked for me. I slowly tightened the filters and
watched what made it through and why, then tested for it. You might reduce
false positives by relaxing the weight values on rvdns, postmaster and abuse
35 matches
Mail list logo
