Most of my failures come from my myfile.txt file. I wrote down key
phrases or words for a week or two and it seems to kill most of them.
Got my first one today since we setup JunkMail four weeks ago! It came
through clean as a whistle...I will look forward to setting up phrases
in the body of
|
| Answering several E-mails here...
|
| Regexp! :)
|
| Probably wishful thinking, I'm sure writing in pattern
| matching would
| be a hefty involvement.
|
| Yes, regexp would be a very hefty involvement (and very
| resource intensive).
Sniffer's online rule manager is getting closer
Reply to: Jeff Kratka
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Sniffer on Friday 3:08:26 PM
You will like Sniffer. Not only is it great at spam detection but
it is substantially faster than text based rules.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s):
Scott, I seem to recall reading a while back that in a future release of
Declude JunkMail that quote marks will be supported in the filter
file. Is this correct? This would be a great addition to the filter
file, as now we periodically catch parts of a work in another word (it can
be at
First question...
In the dec.log, I would like a little more information on the email
other then the Qxx file name, perhaps the sender of the email or
something that makes it easier to identify. Any way to do this? Would
changing the log level setting accomplish this?
Yes -- you can
Answering several E-mails here...
Regexp! :)
Probably wishful thinking, I'm sure writing in pattern matching would be a
hefty involvement.
Yes, regexp would be a very hefty involvement (and very resource intensive).
For example, a character like _ to mean, any white space or punctuation,
Nods. I like your idea in your last message. I might use similar techniques
in some of my scripts I write.
-Original Message-
From: Madscientist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] filter file question
Just curious. How many people are using both Declude Junk Mail and the
sniffer add-on and has it made a difference if yes. I have been completely
pummeled with Spam and am looking for more options.
Thanks.
Jeff
*
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84
Sniffer is great, Declude is great, they compliment each other great!
Declude handles all the header checks,
While Sniffer looks for patterns in the message body.
By running them both I receive almost NO SPAM at all...
Try their Demo to get an idea. ( they update their patterns almost daily!
Good afternoon!
I just installed Junkmail (very easy) and I have 2 questions. I have
gone through the manual but probably missed the answers.
First question...
In the dec.log, I would like a little more information on the email
other then the Qxx file name, perhaps the sender of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
